MMHA 6220 Week 11 Employee Handbook Audit Example

Human Resource Management in Healthcare Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

An audit matrix forms the core of this MMHA 6220 Week 11 employee handbook audit example, with a row for each section of an invented home health agency's 2021 handbook and columns for the related policy drafted this term, the finding, a severity rating and the owner assigned to fix it. Findings fall into four defined types: conflict, gap, stale language and missing acknowledgment. The leave section still describes a single annual bank in full days, the handbook says nothing about the right to leave an unsafe visit, and the pay section still asks employees to keep wages confidential. Walden MMHA 6220 asks for priorities, and the narrative ranks those three. MHA students also see an implementation plan, a calendar of annual review dates with named owners and a disclaimer that the audit certifies nothing.

CourseMMHA 6220 Human Resource Management in Healthcare
WeekWeek 11
Paper typeAudit report
LengthAbout 1,070 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Healthcare Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MMHA 6220 Week 11

1

Nine Handbook Sections Against This Term's Policies: An Audit Matrix for Bellwood Valley Home Health That Finds a Leave Conflict, a Missing Right to Leave Unsafe Visits and a Pay Secrecy Rule

Student Name

Walden University

MMHA 6220: Human Resource Management in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the three most urgent findings, which the narrative after the matrix ranks.
2

Nine Handbook Sections Against This Term's Policies: An Audit Matrix for Bellwood Valley Home Health That Finds a Leave Conflict, a Missing Right to Leave Unsafe Visits and a Pay Secrecy Rule

Purpose and Method

This audit compares each section of the Bellwood Valley Home Health employee handbook, last revised in 2021, with the policies drafted this term: leave, workplace violence prevention, sanction and background screening, fitness for duty, pay transparency, telework and employee assistance. The agency, like its handbook, is a composite created for coursework. Each handbook section was read against the related policy, and every inconsistency was recorded as one of four finding types.

Conflict: the handbook says something that contradicts a current policy. Gap: the handbook is silent on something employees need to know. Stale language: the handbook describes a practice, standard or recommendation that has changed. Missing acknowledgment: the handbook or a policy lacks a current signed employee acknowledgment.

The audit read the handbook as an aide would, start to finish, and also searched it for terms used in each policy, such as intermittent, exclusion and telework, to catch passages that addressed a topic under a different heading.

Severity is rated high where the finding could mislead employees about legal rights or safety, medium where it could cause inconsistent practice, and low where it is a matter of clarity.

What this page is doingThe audit compares the handbook with the term's own policies, a test the agency can repeat each year.
3

Audit Matrix

Table 1

Handbook Audit Matrix

Handbook sectionRelated policyFindingTypeSeverityOwner |
Time off and leaveIntermittent leave procedureDescribes a single annual leave bank used in full days; silent on intermittent leave in hoursConflictHighHR manager |
Safety in the fieldWorkplace violence preventionNo statement of the right to end an unsafe visit without penalty; no check-in procedureGapHighDirector of clinical services |
Pay and compensationPay transparency and equityAsks employees to keep their wages confidentialConflictHighHR manager |
Employment screeningSanction and background screeningMentions background checks at hire only; no monthly exclusion screening or consumer report consent stepsStale languageMediumCompliance officer |
Health requirementsFitness for dutyRequires annual tuberculosis testing for all staffStale languageMediumHR manager with occupational health |
Work locationTeleworkNo section on teleworkGapLowBilling manager |
Employee assistanceSupervisory referral procedureDescribes the program as for substance use problems onlyStale languageLowHR manager |
Standards of conductSanction and screening; privacyDoes not mention viewing records without a job purposeGapMediumPrivacy officer |
AcknowledgmentAll policiesLast acknowledgment signed in 2021; no acknowledgment for this term's policiesMissing acknowledgmentMediumHR manager |

Each finding has one owner, who is responsible for the revision and for its review date.

The Three Most Urgent Revisions

First, remove the pay confidentiality rule. Federal labor law protects most employees when they act together on working conditions, and talking about wages with coworkers counts (29 U.S.C. § 157). A handbook rule asking nonsupervisory employees to keep wages confidential can itself be unlawful, even if never enforced, and it contradicts the pay transparency policy's statement that employees may discuss their pay. The fix is simple: delete the sentence and add the transparency policy's language.

Second, add the right to leave unsafe visits. The workplace violence policy gives every employee in the field the right to end a visit and leave without penalty, but employees learn their rights from the handbook, and the handbook is silent. An aide who believes she will be disciplined for leaving a threatening situation may stay. The handbook should state the right in the first paragraph of its field safety section, along with the check-in procedure.

Third, revise the leave section. The handbook describes leave as a single bank used in full days. Under federal regulations, leave for a serious health condition can be used in pieces, or as a shortened schedule, whenever medically necessary (29 C.F.R. § 825.202). An employee reading the handbook may believe she must take a full day for a two-hour appointment, or that intermittent leave is unavailable. The section should describe intermittent leave and refer employees to HR.

The tuberculosis testing language is also stale and should be revised in the same cycle, since the 2019 national recommendations dropped routine yearly testing for staff who have no known exposure and no ongoing occupational risk (Sosa et al., 2019); requiring it adds cost and testing burden without the benefit the rule assumes.

What this page is doingSeverity sets the order, so the conflicts with law are fixed before the wording problems.
4

Implementation

Revisions will be issued in two stages. The three high-severity findings will be corrected within 30 days through a handbook addendum, sent to every employee along with a plain-language summary of one page and a request to sign that it was received. The medium and low findings will be corrected in a full revised handbook within 90 days, reviewed by counsel before release. Clinical managers will receive a short briefing on the changes so they can answer questions in the field, since aides and nurses rarely read handbook updates at a desk.

Two findings need more than a wording change. The right to leave unsafe visits will only matter if employees believe it, so the director of clinical services will discuss it at every team meeting in the first month and report how many visits were ended under it each quarter. The pay confidentiality rule must be removed from every place it appears, including the offer letter template, where the audit found the same sentence.

Review Calendar

Table 2

Annual Review Calendar With Owners

PolicyReview monthOwner |
Leave and intermittent leave procedureJanuaryHR manager |
Sanction and background screeningFebruaryCompliance officer |
Fitness for dutyMarch, and when federal recommendations changeHR manager |
Workplace violence preventionAprilDirector of clinical services |
TeleworkJuneBilling manager |
Employee assistance and referralAugustHR manager |
Pay transparency and compression reviewOctoberHR manager |
Handbook acknowledgmentNovember, all employeesHR manager |

Reviews are spread over the calendar so no one month bears the whole load.

Disclaimer

This audit identifies inconsistencies between the handbook and the agency's own current policies and notes where the handbook appears out of date. It does not certify that the handbook or any policy complies with federal, state or local law, accreditation standards or payer requirements. Before the revised handbook is issued, the agency's employment counsel should review it, particularly the leave, pay and screening sections, where state law may add requirements.

What this page is doingSaying what the audit does not certify is a professional habit that strengthens, not weakens, the findings.
5

References

Intermittent leave or reduced leave schedule, 29 C.F.R. § 825.202 (2024).

Rights of employees, 29 U.S.C. § 157 (2018).

Sosa, L. E., Njie, G. J., Lobato, M. N., Bamrah Morris, S., Buchta, W., Casey, M. L., Goswami, N. D., Gruden, M., Hurst, B. J., Khan, A. R., Kuhar, D. T., Lewinsohn, D. M., Mathew, T. A., Mazurek, G. H., Reves, R., Paulos, L., Thanassi, W., Will, L., & Belknap, R. (2019). Tuberculosis screening, testing, and treatment of U.S. health care personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(19), 439-443. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6819a3

MMHA 6220 Week 11 instructions, in plain terms

Handbook audit assignments ask students to compare an employee handbook with current policies and identify inconsistencies. Prompts usually require a matrix of findings with severity and ownership, a narrative ranking the most urgent revisions and a plan for ongoing review. Instructors expect findings to be classified consistently and rated by their effect on employees' rights and safety. A disclaimer that the audit does not certify legal compliance is common. Reports usually run four to six pages, mostly in tables. Some prompts provide a sample handbook, while others ask students to audit their employer's. Instructors expect findings to cite the policy that creates each conflict or gap. A plan for issuing changes, including how employees acknowledge them, is often required. Severity criteria should be stated before the matrix so ratings can be checked.

How this MMHA 6220 Week 11 example is built

The report defines four finding types and three severity levels. A nine-row matrix lists handbook sections, related policies, findings, types, severity and owners. A narrative ranks three high-severity revisions, citing federal labor law, leave regulations and tuberculosis guidance. An implementation section sets 30-day and 90-day stages. A calendar assigns review months and owners. A disclaimer closes the report. The implementation section notes that the pay confidentiality sentence also appears in the offer letter template and must be removed there too. A paragraph explains how the right to leave unsafe visits will be reinforced at team meetings, since a right employees do not believe in protects no one.

Where the marks sit in the MMHA 6220 Week 11 rubric

Graders reward consistent classification and severity ratings tied to stated criteria. Assigning a single owner to each finding shows accountability. The narrative earns credit when it explains why the top findings matter, with legal or safety reasons. An implementation plan that addresses how employees will learn about changes shows practical sense. A review calendar spread across the year is a detail strong reports include. The disclaimer is expected. Searching the handbook for key terms, not only reading it section by section, catches passages filed under unexpected headings. Finding the same problem in related documents, such as offer letters, shows thoroughness. Short cells keep the matrix readable.

MMHA 6220 Week 11 help from the desk

List every handbook section and the policy that now governs the same topic. Read them side by side and classify each difference. Rate severity by its effect on employees' rights and safety. Assign one owner per finding. Rank the top three and explain why. Spread review dates across the year. For a custom sample audit of your own handbook, send us its table of contents and current policies. Check offer letters, forms and posters for the same language you find in the handbook. Schedule reviews so each owner has one policy at a time. Ask counsel to review before issuing. Date the audit.

Get a MMHA 6220 Week 11 example written to your instructions

Share the policies or handbook excerpts your course has produced, plus the prompt and the rubric, and an audit comparing them is assembled. The first custom sample is free, 24 to 48 hours. The handbook and agency in the example are constructed, so nothing from your employer's actual handbook is reviewed or judged.

More MMHA 6220 papers and MHA samples

MMHA 6220 Week 11 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MMHA 6220 Week 11 sample paper?

The employee handbook audit with its matrix and review calendar is on this page.

What finding types does the audit use?

Conflict, gap, stale language and missing acknowledgment.

Which revision is most urgent?

Removing the pay confidentiality rule, which can violate federal labor law.

Why add the right to leave unsafe visits?

Employees learn their rights from the handbook, which is silent on it.

Does the audit certify legal compliance?

No. It identifies inconsistencies and recommends review by counsel.