MMHA 6400 Week 11 Hospital Financial Analysis Example

Healthcare Finance Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MMHA 6400 Week 11 financial analysis example closes the course with one document on a composite community hospital: three years of statements, updated ratios, payer mix, the revenue cycle and working capital, ending in a recommendation the board can act on. Walden MMHA 6400 asks MHA students to pull the term together, and the analysis finds receivables up 32% while net patient revenue rose 8.5%, days in receivables at 51.3 and days cash on hand just under the board's 150-day floor. Using HFMA MAP Keys, it traces the problem to authorization denials, which rose to 47% of denials as Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care grew. It estimates that returning to 44.8 receivable days frees about $3.4 million and recommends fixing authorizations before paying cash for the second MRI scanner.

CourseMMHA 6400 Healthcare Finance
WeekWeek 11
Paper typeHospital financial analysis
LengthAbout 1,010 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Healthcare Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MMHA 6400 Week 11

1

Cash Waiting in the Billing Office: A Year-End Financial Analysis of Alder Bend Community Hospital

Student Name

Walden University

MMHA 6400: Healthcare Finance

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the finding, not the topic, because a capstone reader should know the answer from the first line.
2

Cash Waiting in the Billing Office: A Year-End Financial Analysis of Alder Bend Community Hospital

Overview

Alder Bend Community Hospital remains profitable and moderately leveraged, but its cash position weakened this year because collections slowed while revenue grew. The hospital should fix the authorization denials behind its rising receivable days before committing cash to the second MRI scanner, and should revisit the scanner once days cash on hand are back above the board's 150-day floor.

What this page is doingThe two-sentence overview gives the board the hospital's position and the recommendation.
3

Statements

Table 1 summarizes three years of results in thousands of illustrative dollars, drawn from the statements used throughout the course.

Table 1

Three-Year Summary (Dollars in Thousands)

ItemTwo years agoLast yearThis year
Total operating revenue$184,000$192,500$200,000
Total operating expenses$176,600$185,200$194,000
Operating income$7,400$7,300$6,000
Excess of revenue over expenses$11,200$10,600$10,000
Net patient service revenue$177,000$185,000$192,000
Net patient accounts receivable$20,400$22,700$27,000
Cash and board-designated assets$72,000$78,500$75,000
What this page is doingA compact three-year table lets the reader see direction, which matters more than any single year.
4

Revenue grew 8.7% over two years, but expenses grew 9.9%, so operating income fell from $7.4 million to $6.0 million. Investment income kept the bottom line near $10 million each year. The striking line is receivables: they rose 32% over two years while net patient revenue rose 8.5%.

Ratios

Table 2 updates four of the Week 4 measures across three years.

Table 2

Selected Ratios Over Three Years

RatioTwo years agoLast yearThis yearDirection
Operating margin4.0%3.8%3.0%Down
Days cash on hand157.9164.1149.6Down this year
Days in patient accounts receivable42.144.851.3Up, worsening
Debt service coverage4.13.93.4Down

Days cash on hand rose last year with strong investment returns and fell this year as receivables absorbed cash.

What this page is doingTrend words in a final column do the work of arrows, and a note explains the one reversal.
5

Payer Mix

The hospital's payer mix has drifted toward lower-paying and more administratively demanding plans. Over three years, Medicare Advantage rose from 12% to 16% of gross revenue and Medicaid managed care from 14% to 17%, while commercial insurance fell from 30% to 25% and traditional Medicare from 40% to 38%. Self-pay held at 4%. Commercial payers pay the most per case, as the orthopedic analysis showed, so this drift explains part of the slower revenue growth. It also explains part of the receivables problem, because managed care plans, including Medicare Advantage plans, require prior authorization for more services than traditional Medicare does.

What this page is doingPayer mix gets its own section because it explains part of the margin drift.
6

Revenue Cycle

Using measures defined in HFMA's MAP Keys (Healthcare Financial Management Association, 2024), the revenue cycle has weakened on each one examined. The initial denial rate, the share of claims denied on first submission, rose from 7.9% to 9.4% and then to 12.6%. Authorization-related denials grew from 31% of denials two years ago to 47% this year. Cash collected as a share of net patient service revenue fell from 99.1% to 95.2%, meaning the hospital collected less than it earned this year. Days in accounts receivable rose from 42.1 to 51.3.

These measures point in the same direction. Claims are being denied because services were delivered without the required authorization or with authorization that did not match the service billed. Each denied claim must be appealed or corrected and resubmitted, which takes weeks and sometimes fails. The growth of Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care volume, both of which rely heavily on prior authorization, has outpaced the hospital's front-end process for obtaining it. The cause is in patient access and scheduling, not in the billing office itself.

Two other explanations were considered and set aside. A coding backlog would lengthen the time between discharge and final bill, yet that interval has stayed near four days all year. Slower patient payments would show up in self-pay receivables, which have grown only in line with revenue. Neither accounts for the increase. The hospital's own denial logs, sorted by reason code, place nearly half of this year's denials in the authorization category, and the timing of the rise matches the growth in managed care volume quarter by quarter. That convergence of evidence is why the recommendation below starts with patient access rather than with collections staff.

What this page is doingThe revenue cycle section traces the receivables increase to its cause with standard measures.
7

Working Capital

One day of receivables at this year's revenue level is worth about $526,000 to the hospital. Bringing receivable days back to last year's 44.8 would free roughly $3.4 million; reaching 42 days would free close to $4.9 million. Releasing $3.4 million alone would add about 6.8 days of cash on hand, lifting the hospital from 149.6 days to roughly 156, above the board's floor. By contrast, paying $2.8 million in cash for the second MRI scanner now would push days cash on hand down to about 144. The scanner has a positive net present value, but its timing should follow the cash recovery, not precede it (Reiter & Song, 2021).

What this page is doingThe working capital section estimates the cash a fix would release, which links the analysis to the capital decision.
8

Recommendation

1. Fix the authorization process first. Assign authorization responsibility for scheduled imaging, surgery and infusion services to a central team, verify authorization before the service date, and track authorization denials weekly by payer and service. Target: an initial denial rate below 9% within two quarters and receivable days at or below 45 within a year.

2. Work the existing denials. Prioritize appeals of high-dollar authorization denials from the last 120 days, many of which can still be recovered.

3. Prepare for payer negotiations. The orthopedic contract with the largest commercial insurer expires in 18 months, and the shift toward managed care plans makes administrative terms, such as authorization requirements and timely payment, as important as rates.

4. Revisit the second MRI scanner when days cash on hand exceed 155 days, and consider financing it with an equipment loan rather than cash, since debt to capitalization has fallen to 31.6% and the hospital has borrowing capacity.

5. Report revenue cycle measures to the finance committee monthly, alongside the operating margin.

Hospital profitability depends on many factors outside management's control, including payer mix and local market conditions (Bai & Anderson, 2016). The revenue cycle is not one of them. It is the most direct lever Alder Bend has to restore its cash position, and pulling it first makes every later decision, including the scanner, easier to fund.

What this page is doingThe recommendation sets an order of actions and a measurable target for each.
9

References

Bai, G., & Anderson, G. F. (2016). A more detailed understanding of factors associated with hospital profitability. Health Affairs, 35(5), 889-897. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1193

Healthcare Financial Management Association. (2024). MAP Keys: Revenue cycle key performance indicators. Healthcare Financial Management Association.

Reiter, K. L., & Song, P. H. (2021). Gapenski's healthcare finance: An introduction to accounting and financial management (7th ed.). Health Administration Press.

Reading the MMHA 6400 Week 11 instructions

Capstone financial analyses ask you to bring every tool from the term to one organization and reach a recommendation. Summarize several years of results so the trend is visible. Update the key ratios and say which way each is moving. Examine payer mix and how it is shifting. Analyze the revenue cycle with standard measures such as denial rates, days in receivables and cash collected against revenue, and trace any problem to its operational cause, ruling out alternatives. Estimate the cash that fixing the problem would release. Then connect the findings to pending decisions, such as a capital project, and recommend an order of actions with measurable targets. Lead with a short overview so the reader knows the answer first.

How this MMHA 6400 Week 11 example is built

A two-sentence overview gives the position and the recommendation. Table 1 summarizes three years of revenue, expenses, income, receivables and cash. Table 2 updates four ratios with a direction column. The payer mix section shows Medicare Advantage rising from 12% to 16% and commercial falling from 30% to 25%. The revenue cycle section cites HFMA's MAP Keys for denial rates, authorization denials and cash collection, then rules out coding backlogs and patient payments. The working capital section converts receivable days into cash and compares the result with the scanner's effect on days cash. Five recommendations set targets for denials and receivable days, and the closing paragraph cites Bai and Anderson on factors outside management's control.

Where the marks sit in the MMHA 6400 Week 11 rubric

The capstone rubric rewards integration. Using statements, ratios, payer mix and revenue cycle data together, rather than in separate silos, earns the largest share. Tracing the main problem to an operational cause with supporting measures, and ruling out alternatives, is assessed as evidence of analytical depth. Quantifying the effect of a fix, such as cash released, connects analysis to decision. The recommendation must follow from the findings, set priorities and include targets. Earlier course work, such as the capital request, should be reconciled with the conclusions. An executive-ready format, accurate figures, credible sources and APA style complete the grade.

MMHA 6400 Week 11 help: mistakes that cost marks

Final analyses often read as a list of everything learned in the course, with a recommendation tacked on. Decide what the main finding is and organize the paper around it. Use three years where you can, since one year cannot show a trend. When a ratio worsens, dig until you reach an operational cause; denials, coding and patient payments leave different fingerprints in the data. Put a dollar figure on the fix. Then say how it changes the decisions already on the table, especially capital spending. Recommendations need owners and targets, or a board cannot track them. If you are analyzing a real hospital's filings for your capstone, we can prepare the analysis from those statements.

Get a MMHA 6400 Week 11 example written to your instructions

Your capstone prompt, the rubric and any organization or data set it names are what the desk works from, and the analysis is assembled around them. It is returned in 24 to 48 hours, with the first one free. This hospital, its denial problem and its three years of figures are a composite that illustrates structure, not any real system's condition.

More MMHA 6400 papers and MHA samples

MMHA 6400 Week 11 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MMHA 6400 Week 11 sample paper?

The capstone financial analysis of Alder Bend is free to read on this page.

What is the main finding of the MMHA 6400 Week 11 analysis?

Cash weakened because collections slowed, with receivable days rising to 51.3 while revenue grew.

What is causing the slower collections?

Authorization denials, which grew to 47% of all denials as managed care plans became a larger share of volume.

How much cash would a fix release?

About $3.4 million at last year's receivable days, or about $4.9 million at 42 days.

What happens to the MRI scanner?

The analysis recommends revisiting it once days cash on hand exceed 155, possibly financed with an equipment loan.