MMHA 6220 Week 10 Exit Interview Analysis Example

Human Resource Management in Healthcare Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MMHA 6220 Week 10 exit interview analysis example reads 34 exit interviews from an invented home health agency and finds a gap between what departing staff named and what they described: 20 named pay, but 16 of those described drive time, schedule density or after-hours charting around it. A method section sets out who was interviewed, by whom and the limits of data from people already leaving. Coding follows Braun and Clarke's phases, and a codebook table defines each code with a paraphrased example. Themes are counted by interview and role, from the car-shaped day of aides to paperwork that follows nurses home. Walden MMHA 6220 asks for limitations, and the first named is that people who stayed were never interviewed. MHA students see four recommendations, each tied to one theme and one role.

CourseMMHA 6220 Human Resource Management in Healthcare
WeekWeek 10
Paper typeAnalysis paper
LengthAbout 1,050 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Healthcare Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MMHA 6220 Week 10

1

They Said Pay, but They Described the Drive: A Thematic Analysis of Thirty-Four Exit Interviews at Bellwood Valley Home Health, With Its Limits and Four Recommendations

Student Name

Walden University

MMHA 6220: Human Resource Management in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the main finding, the gap between the reason people gave for leaving and the conditions they described around it.
2

They Said Pay, but They Described the Drive: A Thematic Analysis of Thirty-Four Exit Interviews at Bellwood Valley Home Health, With Its Limits and Four Recommendations

Method

Bellwood Valley Home Health, the invented agency followed all term, conducted 34 exit interviews in the past 18 months: 24 with home health aides, 7 with nurses and 3 with therapists. The HR generalist conducted all of them, in person or by phone, during the employee's final week. The form has eight open questions, including the main reason for leaving, what the agency could have done differently, how the employee would describe their workload and their supervisor, and whether they would return. Answers were recorded as notes rather than transcripts.

Data from people already leaving have known limits, discussed below. With that caution, the notes were analyzed in the six steps Braun and Clarke (2006) set out for thematic work, moving from rereading and coding the notes through grouping, checking and naming themes to the write-up. Coding was done by the HR manager and checked by the administrator, who coded a third of the interviews independently; disagreements were discussed and the codebook refined. Departing employees had been told at the start of each interview that their answers would be used in summary form to improve the agency, and the notes were stripped of names before coding.

What this page is doingInterview counts by role are given first, so every theme's frequency can be read against who was asked.
3

Codebook

Table 1

Codebook With Definitions and Paraphrased Examples

CodeDefinitionExample, paraphrased |
Drive timeTime spent driving between visits, unpaid or underpaid"I spent more time in my car than with patients." |
MileageConcerns about mileage reimbursement rate or timingMileage checks came weeks late and did not cover gas. |
Schedule densityToo many visits per day or visits too far apartEight visits across two counties in one day. |
After-hours documentationCompleting visit notes outside paid hoursCharting at the kitchen table every night. |
IsolationLack of contact with colleagues or support in the fieldNever saw another nurse except at the monthly meeting. |
PayHourly rate or salary as a reason for leavingAnother agency offered two dollars more an hour. |
Supervisor supportPositive or negative comments about the direct supervisorMy supervisor always picked up the phone. |
Patient load difficultyComplex or difficult patients and familiesToo many patients with heavy care needs in one week. |

Examples are paraphrased from the notes so that no former employee can be identified.

Themes

Table 2

Themes, Frequency and Roles

ThemeInterviews in which it appearedRoles |
The day is shaped by the car22 of 3419 aides, 2 nurses, 1 therapist |
Paperwork follows me home9 of 346 nurses, 3 therapists |
Working alone15 of 349 aides, 4 nurses, 2 therapists |
Pay as the named reason20 of 3417 aides, 3 nurses |

An interview can contribute to more than one theme; supervisor support was mostly positive and is not reported as a reason for leaving.

The day is shaped by the car. Drive time, mileage and schedule density clustered together, especially among aides. Aides described days with visits spread across counties, unpaid gaps between visits and mileage that did not cover costs. The theme was about the structure of the day, not any single factor.

Paperwork follows me home. Six of the seven nurses and all three therapists described completing documentation after hours, often unpaid in practice for salaried staff.

Working alone. Across all roles, departing employees described rarely seeing colleagues and having no one to ask during a hard visit. This theme appeared even among those who praised their supervisors.

Supervisor support deserves a note because of what it did not show. Most comments about direct supervisors were positive: departing employees described supervisors who answered the phone, covered visits in emergencies and listened. In the agency's case, people were not leaving their managers; they were leaving the shape of the work. That finding redirects attention from supervisor training, a common first response to turnover, toward scheduling and workload.

Stated Reasons and Surrounding Conditions

The most common answer to the main-reason question was pay, named in 20 interviews. But in 16 of those 20, the surrounding notes described drive time, schedule density or after-hours documentation. A typical pattern: an aide said she was leaving for two dollars more an hour, then described a schedule with long unpaid drives between visits. A higher hourly rate elsewhere may have been a way to name a day that felt unsustainable. National survey data on home health workers support this reading: being assigned insufficient hours and lacking consistent patient assignments were associated with greater intent to leave, alongside job satisfaction and benefits (Stone et al., 2017). Pay matters, but raising it alone may not address what departing aides described.

What this page is doingSeparating the stated reason from the surrounding notes is the analytic move that earns the title.
4

Limitations

The most important limitation is that people who stayed were never interviewed. The themes describe those who left, and the same conditions may be present for those who stay and may not drive anyone away; without a comparison, the analysis cannot say which conditions cause departures. Second, the interviewer was from HR, and departing employees may soften criticism of supervisors or the agency to protect references. Third, notes rather than transcripts mean that the interviewer's summaries shaped the data. Fourth, therapists are few, so their themes rest on three interviews. Braun and Clarke (2019) have also emphasized that themes are constructed by analysts rather than discovered, which means another team might have grouped these codes differently.

What this page is doingAdmitting that stayers were never interviewed keeps the recommendations from claiming more than the data show.
5

Recommendations

Recommendations are fewer than themes, and each is linked to one theme and one role.

For aides and the car: redesign routes so that each aide's visits are clustered geographically, and pay drive time between visits at the regular rate. Measure: average unpaid minutes between visits.

For nurses and therapists and paperwork: build 30 minutes of paid documentation time into each day's schedule. Measure: share of notes completed during scheduled hours.

For aides and isolation: start a weekly 30-minute paid huddle by video for aides in each county. Measure: attendance and aide responses in stay interviews.

For all roles and the data gap: begin stay interviews with current employees, asking what keeps them in the job and what might tempt them to quit, so that next year's analysis can compare those who stay with those who go.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Stone, R., Wilhelm, J., Bishop, C. E., Bryant, N. S., Hermer, L., & Squillace, M. R. (2017). Predictors of intent to leave the job among home health workers: Analysis of the National Home Health Aide Survey. The Gerontologist, 57(5), 890-899. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw075

Reading the MMHA 6220 Week 10 instructions

Exit interview analysis assignments ask students to analyze qualitative data from departing employees and recommend retention strategies. Prompts usually require a method description, a coding approach, themes with supporting evidence, limitations and recommendations. Instructors expect students to use an established method, such as thematic analysis, and to report how often themes appeared. Distinguishing what employees say is the reason from the conditions they describe is valued. Limitations should be specific. Expect four to six pages, usually carrying a table or two. Some prompts provide exit data, while others ask students to design an exit interview process. Instructors appreciate analyses that propose stay interviews to fill the gap that exit data leave.

How the MMHA 6220 Week 10 example is put together

The method section describes the 34 interviews, the form, a second coder and consent. A codebook table defines eight codes with paraphrased examples. A themes table reports frequency and roles, and paragraphs describe each theme and the mostly positive comments about supervisors. A section contrasts pay as the stated reason with the surrounding conditions, citing national survey findings. Limitations cover the missing stayers, interviewer effects, notes rather than transcripts and small numbers. Four recommendations follow, each with a measure. Each theme is described in a short paragraph with the roles it came from. A closing recommendation proposes stay interviews so next year's analysis can compare leavers with stayers. Every recommendation names its role and its measure. Limitations get their own section.

Reading the MMHA 6220 Week 10 rubric

Graders look for a named analytic method applied step by step. A codebook with definitions makes the analysis checkable. Reporting frequency by role earns credit. The comparison between stated and surrounding reasons is often the insight that lifts a paper. Specific limitations, especially the absence of employees who stayed, show methodological maturity. Recommendations that are fewer than themes and tied to measures show focus. Reporting what departing staff said about supervisors, even when it was positive, shows the analysis followed the data rather than a preferred story. Proposing stay interviews to address the main limitation shows the student is planning the next round. Paraphrased examples protect former staff.

MMHA 6220 Week 10 help from the desk

Read all the interviews once before coding anything. Write a short definition for each code and keep an example. Count how many interviews each theme appears in, by role. Look for answers where the stated reason and the details disagree. List what your data cannot tell you. Then write one recommendation per theme that matters most, each with a measure. If you would like a custom sample analysis of your own exit data, send us de-identified notes. Ask a colleague to code a sample of interviews independently and compare results. Paraphrase examples so no one can be identified. Keep recommendations fewer than themes.

Get a MMHA 6220 Week 10 example written to your instructions

Send the exit data or case summary your section provides, the prompt and the rubric, and an analysis coded from that material comes back. Free for your first custom sample, delivered in 24 to 48 hours. Every interview in the example was written for it; no real departing employee's words appear anywhere.

More MMHA 6220 papers and MHA samples

MMHA 6220 Week 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MMHA 6220 Week 10 sample paper?

The exit interview thematic analysis is on this page.

What method was used?

Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six phases, with a second coder.

What was the most common theme among aides?

Days shaped by driving, mileage and spread-out visits.

Was pay the real reason people left?

Pay was often named, but most who named it also described drive time or workload.

What is the main limitation?

People who stayed were never interviewed, so the analysis cannot show what causes departures.