MMHA 6111 Week 1 Leadership Practices Baseline Post Example

Leadership and Organizational Change Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MMHA 6111 Week 1 discussion post example answers the course's opening thread with episodes rather than adjectives. Walden MMHA 6111 opens the MHA program's leadership and change course by asking students to place themselves against Kouzes and Posner's five practices, and the post ranks them for a composite outpatient imaging manager, strongest to weakest, saying the order rests on the assigned chapter rather than a formal instrument. One episode shows enabling others to act, two technologists redesigning their own weekend rotation, and another shows how rarely the manager encourages the heart, a week of rebooked patients that went unthanked. The last paragraph names the practice an upcoming imaging consolidation will strain first, drawing on Bridges and Bridges on endings and Oreg and colleagues on how recipients' treatment shapes their reactions.

CourseMMHA 6111 Leadership and Organizational Change
WeekWeek 1
Paper typeLeadership practices baseline post
LengthAbout 570 words, 4 pages
FormatDiscussion post, APA 7 citations
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Healthcare Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MMHA 6111 Week 1

1

Week 1 Discussion: Initial Post and Replies

Five Practices, Ranked by What My Team Would Actually See

Ranked from most to least visible in the work of the composite outpatient imaging manager I am writing about, Kouzes and Posner's five practices fall in this order: enable others to act, model the way, challenge the process, inspire a shared vision and, last by some distance, encourage the heart (Kouzes & Posner, 2017). The ranking rests on the assigned chapter and on episodes from the past year, not on a formal instrument; a structured self-assessment comes later in the term and may change it.

Enabling others to act is the strongest because of how the manager handled a schedule dispute last spring. Two technologists at the satellite imaging center disagreed about weekend rotation, and each had a fair complaint. Instead of setting a rotation, the manager asked them to redesign it together within two limits, coverage on every shift and no one working more than two weekends in a row, and approved what they produced. The rotation has held for a year, and the two now cover for each other without being asked. That is the practice at work: giving people the authority and information to solve a problem that is theirs.

Encouraging the heart is the weakest, and one episode shows why. After a week in which the satellite team absorbed a scanner outage by rebooking forty patients and staying late twice, the manager sent a schedule update on Friday and said nothing else. The team noticed. Recognition is not something the manager avoids on principle; it simply does not happen without a reason to remember it.

That weakness matters now because the satellite center is about to close, with its staff and one scanner moving into the hospital's imaging department when the lease ends. A consolidation asks people to give up a place they chose and routines they built. Bridges and Bridges argue that every change begins with an ending, and that people need their losses acknowledged before they can commit to what comes next (Bridges & Bridges, 2016). A review of six decades of research on how employees respond to change likewise found that how recipients are treated during a change, including whether they feel supported and informed, shapes their reactions to it (Oreg et al., 2011). Recognizing what they have contributed, and what they are being asked to give up, is the practice the move will strain first, and it is the one this manager is least practiced in. The plan for the consolidation will need to build recognition in deliberately rather than leave it to memory.

What this page is doingThe post ranks the practices for one composite manager and says what the ranking rests on, without defining them.
2

Reply to Natalie

Natalie, you describe your manager as visionary and collaborative. Could you give one episode that shows each? I ask because the five practices are about behavior, and an example would let us see whether the vision is something the team shares or something the manager talks about. If there is a meeting where staff shaped the plan, that would be strong evidence of both.

What this page is doingThe first reply asks for an episode behind a classmate's adjectives.
3

Reply to Andre

Andre, you rank challenging the process as your strongest practice and say your unit is about to adopt a new electronic record. I wonder whether the change will test a different practice first. Staff learning a new system often need encouragement more than challenge, at least in the first months. Which practice do you think your team will need most from you in the first thirty days?

What this page is doingThe second reply tests a classmate's ranking against the change he faces.
4

References

Bridges, W., & Bridges, S. (2016). Managing transitions: Making the most of change (4th ed.). Da Capo Lifelong Books.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Wiley.

Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients' reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550

MMHA 6111 Week 1 instructions, in plain terms

Opening leadership threads usually ask you to describe your leadership against a framework. Avoid defining the framework's terms; your readers have the same chapter. Instead, rank the practices or behaviors for yourself or a composite leader and say what the ranking rests on. Support the strongest and weakest with one specific episode each, told concretely, so a reader can picture what the leader did. Then connect the weakest practice to a real change ahead, explaining why that change will test it. Cite sources that explain why the practice matters for the change. In replies, ask classmates for the episode behind any adjective they use, or test their ranking against the change they face. Keep the post to discussion length and write in the first person where the course allows.

Inside the MMHA 6111 Week 1 example

The first paragraph ranks Kouzes and Posner's five practices for the composite manager and says the ranking rests on the chapter. The second describes two technologists redesigning their weekend rotation within limits the manager set, as evidence of enabling others to act. The third describes a week of forty rebooked patients that went unthanked, as evidence of weak encouragement. The fourth connects that weakness to the coming consolidation of a satellite imaging site, citing Bridges and Bridges on acknowledging endings and Oreg and colleagues on how treatment during change shapes reactions. The reply to Natalie asks for episodes behind her manager's adjectives. The reply to Andre asks which practice his team will need first during a new record rollout.

MMHA 6111 Week 1 rubric: what earns full marks

Opening leadership posts are judged on evidence. A post describing a leadership style in adjectives, visionary or collaborative, earns participation credit but little for analysis. Ranking the practices and saying what the ranking rests on earns the first share. Episodes that show the strongest and weakest practices in action earn the largest share, because they let readers judge the claim. Connecting the weakest practice to a specific upcoming change shows the self-assessment has a purpose. Sources that explain why the practice matters strengthen that connection. Replies earn credit by asking for the episode behind a claim or by testing a classmate's ranking. Defining the five practices wastes space and earns nothing.

Common MMHA 6111 Week 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Leadership posts often list strengths in general terms, such as good communicator or team player, and close with a goal to keep growing. That gives classmates nothing to discuss. Choose instead a framework from your reading and ask, for each element, when you last saw yourself do it. Rank the elements by how often your team would actually see them. Write one episode for the top and one for the bottom. Then look at a change coming in your workplace and ask which element it will test hardest. That connection makes the post useful to you as well as to your classmates. We can draft a leadership baseline post that ranks practices with episodes and ties the weakest to a coming change.

Get a MMHA 6111 Week 1 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 1 discussion prompt and the rubric your section posted, and a finished baseline post with both replies comes back within 24-48h, free the first time. If your section names a different first framework, such as the full-range model, say so; the example is rebuilt around that one rather than forced onto Kouzes and Posner.

More MMHA 6111 papers and MHA samples

MMHA 6111 Week 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MMHA 6111 Week 1 sample paper?

The baseline post and its two replies are free to read on this page.

Which framework does the MMHA 6111 Week 1 post use?

The five leadership practices described by Kouzes and Posner.

Which practice is strongest for the composite manager?

Enabling others to act, shown by letting two technologists redesign their own weekend rotation.

Which practice is weakest?

Encouraging the heart, shown by a hard week of rebooked patients that went unrecognized.

Why does the weakest practice matter now?

A coming imaging consolidation will ask the satellite team to give up its site, and recognition of that loss will be needed most.