| Course | NURS 6720 Population-Based Public Health Nursing Interventions |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | Aggregate profile |
| Length | About 740 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 6720 Week 2
Open Series: A Profile of Resettled Children Under Twelve Whose Catch-Up Vaccination Began at Screening and Has Not Finished
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 6720: Population-Based Public Health Nursing Interventions
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Open Series: A Profile of Resettled Children Under Twelve Whose Catch-Up Vaccination Began at Screening and Has Not Finished
Definition
The aggregate is children under 12 years of age, resettled in a composite mid-sized city through the U.S. refugee admissions program within the past three years, who began a catch-up vaccination series at their domestic health screening and whose series remains open in the state immunization information system. Four boundaries define the group: age at the time of the extract, resettlement status, time since arrival and series status. Children who arrived through other immigration pathways, children older than 11 and children whose series is recorded as complete fall just outside, even though some share the same neighborhoods and schools. Population-based practice starts from a defined population rather than from the individuals who happen to seek care (Keller et al., 2004), and the narrow definition is deliberate. A program objective written later will have to be measured against a group that existing records can count, and a phrase such as refugee families cannot be counted.
How the Aggregate Was Sized
Two record types were combined. The state immunization information system holds the doses given to each child by any enrolled provider, and registries of this kind are recognized as a tool for identifying children who are due or overdue and for supporting reminder programs (Groom et al., 2015). The state refugee health program's screening records show which newly arrived children had a domestic health screening and began a catch-up series there. Reviews of care for resettled refugee children in the United States treat that screening, and the catch-up care it starts, as a core part of the first months after arrival (Phung, 2023). Screening records were linked to registry records using three fields, the child's name, birth date and sex, and any record left unlinked went to manual review. The figures below belong to the composite city and are illustrative.
Table 1
Aggregate Size and Series Status (Composite Extract)
| Measure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Children under 12 resettled in the past three years | 412 | State refugee health program arrival and screening records |
| Of these, began a catch-up series at screening | 298 | Screening records matched to registry |
| Of these, series open in the registry at extract | 171 (57%) | Immunization information system |
| Extract date | First business day of the quarter | Registry analyst |
| Matching method | Name, date of birth and sex, then manual review of unmatched records | Registry analyst |
Open means the registry shows at least one catch-up dose given and at least one dose not yet recorded. The profile does not describe which vaccines are due; that is a clinical question for immunization guidance.
Who They Are
Resettlement agency arrival summaries for the composite city show that most families in the aggregate speak one of four languages at home, with a small number speaking languages for which the city has no local interpreter. Most live in two neighborhoods where the resettlement agencies place families in affordable rental housing, both served by bus routes that run less often on evenings and weekends. Households are larger than the city average, and many include children at several ages, so one family may hold two or three open series at once. In their first years, many parents begin work in warehouse, food processing and hotel jobs with shifts that overlap the hours most clinics are open.
A Record Problem That May Distort the Count
The share of open series may be too high, because some children who finished their series may appear twice in the registry. Three features of the records make that likely. Some children were assigned a default date of birth, such as the first day of the year, when their exact date was not known, so two records for the same child may show different birth dates once a corrected date is entered. Names written in other scripts are transliterated in different ways by different clinics, so one child can appear under two spellings. And families who move between the two neighborhoods may visit a second clinic, where staff open a fresh chart when a search fails to find the existing one. In each case, the doses given at the second clinic sit on a record the matching process may not link to the first, and the first record looks incomplete. The next step is a manual review of a sample of open records to estimate how many are duplicates before any program is sized.
References
Groom, H., Hopkins, D. P., Pabst, L. J., Murphy Morgan, J., Patel, M., Calonge, N., Coyle, R., Dombkowski, K., Groom, A. V., Kurilo, M. B., Rasulnia, B., Shefer, A., Town, C., Wortley, P. M., & Zucker, J. (2015). Immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: A Community Guide systematic review. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(3), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000069
Keller, L. O., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffer, M. A. (2004). Population-based public health interventions: Practice-based and evidence-supported. Part I. Public Health Nursing, 21(5), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.21509.x
Phung, B. (2023). Caring for resettled refugee children in the United States: Guidelines, challenges and public health perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1046319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1046319
NURS 6720 Week 2 instructions, in plain terms
Week 2 usually asks you to select and describe the aggregate your program will serve: who is in it, how many, what characterizes them and what data describe them. Expect a short paper or brief of two to three pages with a table. Write the definition as a set of boundaries a record could be checked against, and say who falls just outside. Size the group from sources you can name, stating when and how the data were drawn. Describe the characteristics that will matter for program design, such as language and access. Stay with population description; clinical schedules and eligibility belong to other documents.
Inside the NURS 6720 Week 2 example
The definition paragraph lists four boundaries, names who sits just outside and explains why a countable group matters for later objectives, citing Keller and colleagues on population-based practice. The sizing section names the two record types, cites Phung on screening after arrival and Groom and colleagues on registries, and explains the matching method. Table 1 gives the composite counts, the open share, the extract date and the matching rule, with a note that vaccines due are a clinical question. A description section covers languages, neighborhoods, household size and shift work. The final section explains three ways duplicate records arise and proposes a manual sample review.
Where the marks sit in the NURS 6720 Week 2 rubric
Profile rubrics tend to reward a precise aggregate definition, appropriate data sources, relevant characteristics and a clear link to program planning. Precision is judged on whether a reader could decide who is in or out. Data criteria reward named sources, stated dates and honesty about limits. Characteristics earn credit when they bear on how a program would reach people, not when they fill space. Many instructors also reward noticing a data problem before it distorts later work. Writing criteria cover APA, tables that summarize rather than repeat and a tone that describes families without generalizing about cultures. Some sections also score whether the aggregate matches the problem named in Week 1, so check that the group you define is the one your later program can reach. A short note on who falls just outside the boundary shows the definition was tested.
NURS 6720 Week 2 help from the desk
Profiles often lose marks with a definition too broad to count, such as immigrant families or low-income children. Another loss is a table of figures with no source or date. Some papers describe the group with stereotypes instead of data. Others accept the data at face value and miss a problem that will distort every later target. Write boundaries as rules, name your sources and their dates, describe only characteristics that matter for reaching people and look for errors in the records. If you want a profile drafted for the aggregate your section assigns, send the prompt to the desk. Also avoid mixing figures from different years or geographies in one table without saying so. When a figure is illustrative, label it as such in the table note, not only in the text.
Get a NURS 6720 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Which group, and which problem? Answer both in a line alongside the Week 2 prompt and rubric, and the profile defines that aggregate as a countable rule, exclusions stated, and sizes it from records you can name. First custom sample free of charge, returned inside 24-48 hours.
More NURS 6720 papers and MSN samples
- NURS 6720 Week 1: Discussion post
- NURS 6720 Week 3: Evidence review
- NURS 6720 Week 4: Intervention selection paper
- NURS 6720 Week 5: Goals and objectives
- NURS 6720 Week 6: Implementation plan
- NURS 6720 Week 7: Cultural adaptation memo
- NURS 6720 Week 8: Discussion post
- NURS 6720 Week 9: Evaluation plan
- NURS 6720 Week 10: Program proposal
- NURS 6720 Week 11: Reflection
- NURS 6710 Week 2: Determinants analysis
- NURS 6630 Week 2: Neurotransmission brief
- NURS 6521 Week 2: Prescriptive authority analysis
- NURS 6512 Week 2: Tailored history interview plan
NURS 6720 Week 2 questions, answered
Why is the aggregate defined so narrowly?
Because a later objective has to be written against a group that can be counted, and a broad phrase such as refugee families cannot be. Each boundary in the example narrows the group to children a program could identify and reach through existing records. Your section may accept a broader definition, and even then every boundary in the custom version is stated as a rule.
Does the profile say which vaccines the children need?
No. It counts series status as recorded, open or complete, and never discusses schedules, doses or clinical eligibility, which belong to clinicians and immunization guidance. The profile is a population description built for program planning. If your assignment requires clinical background, the authoritative source is cited directly rather than paraphrased into a recommendation.
Where can I find a free NURS 6720 Week 2 sample paper?
The full aggregate profile, definition, sizing table, description and record problem, is free to read here. A profile of the aggregate your course names can be requested.
What record problem does the NURS 6720 Week 2 profile raise?
Duplicate registry records caused by placeholder birth dates, different spellings of transliterated names and new charts opened at a second clinic, which can make completed series look open.
Does the NURS 6720 profile print real counts?
No. Its table uses illustrative figures for a composite city, labeled as such, with the extract date and matching method stated so the structure can be followed.