NURS 6512 Week 2 Tailored History Plan Example

Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 6512 Week 2 tailored history interview plan example prepares to interview Mr. H., an invented 74-year-old retired grain elevator operator living alone on a farm 38 miles from the nearest hospital. His wife of 49 years died seven months ago after a long illness. He has hypertension and knee osteoarthritis and comes in because his daughter, three hours away, thinks he sounds tired all the time; he calls it a blood pressure check. The plan profiles him, maps risks such as depression, alcohol use, falls and isolation, sets communication approaches for a reluctant patient, groups targeted questions by risk domain and selects the Geriatric Depression Scale, Short Form. Walden NURS 6512, Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning, marks down MSN plans whose questions could fit anyone. References include Ball's Seidel's Guide, Yesavage and Sheikh on the GDS and research on bereavement in older men.

CourseNURS 6512 Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning
WeekWeek 2
Paper typeTailored history interview plan
LengthAbout 1,170 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing (MSN)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 6512 Week 2

1

A Tailored Health History Plan for a Recently Widowed 74-Year-Old Man Living Alone in a Rural County

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 6512: Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title does the work of an abstract: age, bereavement, living alone, and rural setting are the four facts that generate every later section, and all four are in it. A reader who sees only the title page already knows why this interview cannot be a generic one.
2

A Tailored Health History Plan for a Recently Widowed 74-Year-Old Man Living Alone in a Rural County

Patient Profile

Mr. H., invented for this plan from no single real person, is a 74-year-old retired grain elevator operator who lives alone on a farm property 38 miles from the nearest hospital. His wife of 49 years died of pancreatic cancer seven months ago after a long illness during which he was her main caregiver. He has hypertension and osteoarthritis of both knees, and he comes to the rural health clinic today because his daughter, who lives three hours away, made the appointment after noticing on the phone that he "sounds tired all the time." He describes the visit as a blood pressure check.

Three features of this profile shape the plan. He did not choose the visit, so his agenda and his daughter's differ. He carried a caregiver role for two years and has now lost both the person and the role. And he lives far from services, alone, in a community where self-reliance is valued and asking for help can feel like failure. A history that follows the standard order of chief complaint and review of systems would record his blood pressure and his knees and would probably miss the reason his daughter called.

Risk Map

The profile raises six risk domains, each tied to a specific fact. Mood is the first, because bereavement within the past year, the loss of a caregiving role, and his daughter's observation of fatigue together make depression the most pressing concern. Grief and depression overlap in the first year, and a history must separate them rather than assume either (Zisook & Shear, 2009). Alcohol use is the second domain, since older men living alone after a loss are at risk of drinking more, and alcohol interacts with his antihypertensive and his arthritis medication.

Falls are the third domain. Knee osteoarthritis, a farm property with uneven ground and outbuildings, and possible orthostatic effects from his blood pressure medication all raise the risk, and a fall with no one else at home can mean a long lie before help arrives. Nutrition is the fourth: his wife cooked, and men who lose a spouse who managed meals often eat less and less well. Isolation is the fifth, given the distance from neighbors and town. Access to care is the sixth, because a 76-mile round trip affects whether any follow-up plan is realistic.

What this page is doingThe risk map is what makes the interview tailored. Each domain names the fact from the profile that raised it, so a grader can trace every later question back to this patient. Plans that skip this step can still contain good questions, but the questions look arbitrary because nothing shows why they were chosen.
3

Communication Considerations

Two features of Mr. H.'s presentation will govern how the interview is conducted. First, his stated reason for coming is narrow. Opening with the blood pressure check honors his agenda and builds the trust needed for later questions; moving directly to mood would confirm his suspicion that he was brought in to be told he is not coping. The interview therefore begins with the complaint he named and widens gradually, using transitions that explain why each new topic is being raised.

Second, grief and a reticent manner can both suppress disclosure. Older rural men often describe emotional distress in physical terms, such as poor sleep, low energy, or weight change, rather than as sadness (Ball et al., 2023). The interviewer should listen for those somatic descriptions and follow them. Silences should be allowed to run; a question about his wife may produce a long pause, and filling it too quickly signals that the topic is unwelcome. Questions about mood, drinking, and safety are asked after rapport is established, in plain language, and with a normalizing preface so that a yes does not feel like an admission of weakness.

Targeted Questions by Domain

Mood. "It has been about seven months since your wife died. How have you been getting along since then?" If he describes difficulty, the interviewer follows with "Some people find they lose interest in things they used to enjoy after a loss like yours. Has that happened to you?" and then asks directly about hopelessness and thoughts of not wanting to live. A positive answer to either leads to a safety assessment, including access to firearms, which are common on farm properties.

Alcohol. "Many people find their habits change when they are living alone. How often do you have a drink containing alcohol these days?" This is followed by the remaining AUDIT-C items on typical quantity and frequency of six or more drinks on one occasion (Bush et al., 1998). A score of 4 or more for a man prompts a fuller conversation about how drinking has changed since his wife's death.

Falls. The three screening questions from the STEADI initiative are asked verbatim: "Have you fallen in the past year? Do you feel unsteady when standing or walking? Do you worry about falling?" (Stevens & Phelan, 2013). Any yes leads to questions about where and how, whether he could get up, and how long he was down.

Nutrition. "Who does the cooking now, and what did you eat yesterday?" A concrete recall is more informative than asking whether he eats well. Weight change since the funeral is asked about specifically.

Isolation and access. "Who do you talk to in a normal week?" and "If you needed to come back here in two weeks, how would you get here?" The first identifies his contacts; the second tests whether a follow-up plan is realistic before one is made.

What this page is doingQuestions are grouped by risk domain rather than body system, and each opens broadly before narrowing. That ordering is what the rubric means by patient-centered interviewing. The mood domain also shows a skill graders look for at this level: a positive answer does not end the line of questioning, it leads to a safety assessment, and the firearm question is tied to a feature of this patient's setting.
4

Selected Screening Instrument: The Geriatric Depression Scale, Short Form

The Geriatric Depression Scale was developed specifically for older adults and uses a yes or no response format that is easy to administer and understand (Yesavage et al., 1982). The original version contained 30 items, and a 15-item short form was later validated for settings where time is limited (Sheikh & Yesavage, 1986). A score of 5 or more on the short form suggests depression and warrants further evaluation, and a score of 10 or more is strongly suggestive.

Three features make it the better fit for Mr. H. than the alternatives. First, the scale deliberately omits most somatic items. In an older man with arthritis and poor sleep after bereavement, instruments that count fatigue, appetite, and sleep as depressive symptoms can overstate depression by scoring physical illness and normal grief. Second, the yes or no format suits a reticent patient who may be uncomfortable rating the intensity of feelings on a scale. Third, it was designed and normed in older populations, whereas the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the main alternative, was validated in general adult primary care samples (Kroenke et al., 2001). The PHQ-9 remains useful for tracking severity once depression is identified, and it includes an explicit item on thoughts of self-harm that the Geriatric Depression Scale lacks, so the interviewer asks that question directly regardless of the score.

The instrument does not replace the interview. It gives a structured, repeatable measure that can be compared at follow-up, and it supports the clinician's judgment about whether Mr. H.'s low energy reflects grief, depression, or a physical cause such as anemia or hypothyroidism, which would then be pursued in the examination and laboratory plan.

What this page is doingThe instrument section earns its marks on fit, not description. It names what the tool measures and for whom, then argues the choice against a named alternative for reasons drawn from this patient's profile. It also states the tool's limit (no self-harm item) and says how the plan compensates, which is the kind of reasoning that separates an A from a B on this criterion.
5

References

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2023). Seidel's guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (10th ed.). Elsevier.

Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789-1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

Sheikh, J. I., & Yesavage, J. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist, 5(1-2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_09

Stevens, J. A., & Phelan, E. A. (2013). Development of STEADI: A fall prevention resource for health care providers. Health Promotion Practice, 14(5), 706-714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912463576

Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

Zisook, S., & Shear, K. (2009). Grief and bereavement: What psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00217.x

NURS 6512 Week 2 instructions, in plain terms

Week 2 of NURS 6512 asks for a health history plan tailored to one patient. Profile the patient, map risks, plan communication, write questions grouped by risk and choose a screening instrument with reasons. Questions written for anyone lose marks, so each should reflect this patient's age, situation and risks. Cite assessment and screening sources in APA 7. Grouping questions by risk domain rather than body system keeps the plan focused on what matters for him. Other validated instruments can be used if justified. The plan does not include the patient's answers. Explain why he may understate symptoms.

How this NURS 6512 Week 2 example is built

The plan runs three or four pages under clear headings. A profile paragraph gives the patient's age, living situation, recent bereavement and why he has come in. A risk map follows, naming the domains the profile raises: mood after loss, alcohol use, falls, nutrition when cooking for one, isolation and access to care. Communication considerations come next, including how grief and a reticent rural manner may shape disclosure and how the interview is paced around them. The core is a set of targeted questions, grouped by domain and written verbatim, each paired with its purpose. One instrument, the Geriatric Depression Scale, is selected, described by what it measures and for whom it was designed, and justified against alternatives. References close the paper. The widower is a composite.

Where the marks sit in the NURS 6512 Week 2 rubric

Plans in this week lose marks when the questions could have been written for anyone. A generic set, the same for a teenager and a rural widower, shows the profile went unused, and using it is what the exercise exists to test. The risk map is often missing, and without it the questions appear arbitrary even when each is reasonable. Sensitive topics handled with blunt closed questions draw specific comment, since the course expects wording that makes disclosure easier. The instrument section is scored on fit: a tool described accurately but chosen without reference to this patient's risks earns part of the available marks. Sources that describe the instrument without supporting its use in older adults weaken the justification. APA formatting and reference currency account for smaller deductions.

NURS 6512 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

History plans score poorly when questions are generic. Write ones only this patient needs. A second weakness is ignoring the visit's real reason. Address the daughter's concern gently. Writers also skip communication. Plan for a man who did not choose the visit. Avoid leading questions about grief. Open the door instead. Justify the instrument. A question such as how are you managing meals since your wife passed connects bereavement, nutrition and isolation in one line. Close with the risk you most need to rule out. Write the questions in plain words a tired, grieving man would answer.

Get a NURS 6512 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Your Week 2 prompt, the rubric and the assigned patient profile are all the desk needs to map that person's risks and justify a screening instrument for them. A first sample is free of charge and reaches you in 24 to 48 hours. The widower in the example lives only on the page.

More NURS 6512 papers and MSN samples

NURS 6512 Week 2 questions, answered

Why group questions by risk domain rather than by body system?

Because this week's plan exists to detect risks a profile suggests, and a domain grouping shows the link between each question and the reason it is asked. A body-system layout suits a full review and hides that link. Where a prompt insists on a systems format, the example keeps the risk map and cross-references each question to it.

Is the Geriatric Depression Scale the only acceptable instrument?

No. It fits this composite because it was designed for older adults and the profile's most pressing risk is mood after bereavement. A different profile would justify a different tool, such as an alcohol-use screen or a falls-risk measure. The marks follow the justification, so whichever instrument your plan uses, its fit to the patient has to be argued.

Does the plan include the patient's answers?

Usually not. This week asks for the interview design, and the example stops at the questions, their purpose and the instrument. Some sections also ask for a sample exchange or anticipated responses; where yours does, the sample adds a short illustrative passage, clearly marked as hypothetical and still built on the composite.

Where can I find a free NURS 6512 Week 2 sample paper?

The rural widower history plan is on this page with the profile, risk map, communication approach, targeted questions and the depression screen.

Why does the patient's daughter matter in NURS 6512 Week 2?

She made the appointment because he sounds tired, so the plan must address her concern while respecting that he calls it a blood pressure check.