Measures, timing and a halt condition anchor a Week 9 evaluation plan example written for NURS 6720, applying CDC's evaluation framework and RE-AIM to the resettled children's reminder program. Searches like "nurs 6720 week 9 assignment example", "nurs6720 week 9 sample" and "nurs 6720 week 9 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 6720 Week 9 evaluation plan looks like
A short description of the program and its logic model opens the plan, following the CDC framework's early steps, and a paragraph then names who will use the findings: the health department, the resettlement agency, the association and the families themselves. The core is a measures table organized by RE-AIM's five dimensions. Reach is the share of the aggregate contacted in a preferred language; effectiveness is series completion against the Week 5 objectives; adoption is the number of partner sites taking part; implementation is fidelity to the contact protocol, read from call and visit logs; maintenance is whether the association sustains outreach after the grant. Sources and reading schedules are fixed row by row. The halt condition, and who would make the call, sit in a decision section, and a final paragraph covers how results return to families.
How a NURS 6720 Week 9 example is structured
Description first, because the CDC framework treats a shared account of the program as the ground everything measured later stands on. The users paragraph follows and connects each reader to the decision the evaluation informs, which keeps the measures purposeful. The RE-AIM table is the plan's center, one row per dimension, and its columns are fixed: measure, source, baseline, reading schedule and responsible role. Keeping the acronym's order is not arbitrary here, since reach limits what effectiveness can show. Timing gets its own paragraph, explaining why the first reading waits out a quarter of registry lag. The decision section sits after the table and states the halt condition in the measures' own units and wording, so no reinterpretation is possible later. The return-to-families paragraph closes the plan and completes the framework's final step, putting findings to use.
The program described first
A brief description and logic model open the plan, following the CDC framework's early steps, so every measure has a stated purpose.
Five dimensions, five rows
Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance each get one measure, one source and one reading schedule.
Waiting out the lag
The first reading is set a quarter after launch because registry entries trail the doses they record.
The halt condition
A stated result after two quarters would pause the program for redesign, and the plan names who makes that call.
Findings back to families
The closing paragraph describes how results are shared with the association and the families, completing the framework's step on use.
Where marks go in NURS 6720 Week 9
An evaluation plan has to be able to decide something, and the halt condition is where this one proves it can. Measure quality usually carries the largest share, and a source, baseline and schedule for every row meets that standard. Framework use earns a separate block: the CDC steps appear in order, and RE-AIM organizes the measures instead of sitting in a paragraph of its own. Alignment with Week 5 is checked closely, and every objective has a measure here. The users and return sections earn credit in rubrics that stress partnership. The plans that disappoint on this assignment treat contacts made as though they were series completed, leave timing unspecified, name no result that would count against the program, and forget that registry entries arrive late.
Get a NURS 6720 Week 9 example written to your instructions
Your objectives and intervention design are the inputs to add to the Week 9 prompt and rubric. Each objective receives a measure, a source and a reading date, and the plan names a result that would halt the program before more effort goes into a design that is not working. The first sample carries no charge and arrives within 24-48 hours.
NURS 6720 Week 9 questions, answered
Why does the plan include a condition for stopping the program?
Because an evaluation that no result could halt is closer to reporting than to judgment. Stating in advance what would pause the program, and who decides, commits the team before data arrive and protects families from a design that is not reaching them. Your prompt may call it a decision rule or a threshold, and custom work uses the term your rubric uses.
Is RE-AIM required, or could a logic model serve alone?
A logic model can organize an evaluation, and the example includes one in its program description. RE-AIM adds dimensions a logic model often underplays, especially reach and maintenance, which matter for an aggregate that is easy to miss and a program that must outlast its grant. If your course names another framework, measures stay tied to sources under that one too.
Does the plan specify the actual threshold?
The finished plan does, and it justifies the number from the baseline and program capacity. This page describes the condition's structure, a measure, a threshold, a time point and a decision-maker, without stating a figure invented for a program that does not exist. For your program, the threshold comes from your own baseline data with the reasoning written out.