MRKT 4501 Week 8 Communications Budget Rationale Example

Course	MRKT 4501 Marketing Management
Week	Week 8
Paper type	Budget rationale
Length	About 780 words, 5 pages
Format	APA 7 student paper
School	Walden University
Program	BS in Business Administration
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for MRKT 4501 Week 8

What the Budget Buys and What It Stops Buying: A Communications Budget Rationale for a Garden Tool Maker, Allocating $1.2 Million by Objective and Naming Each Activity the New Mix Displaces

Student Name

Walden University

MRKT 4501: Marketing Management

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title puts the displaced activities on equal footing with the funded ones, which is the rationale's central discipline.

What the Budget Buys and What It Stops Buying: A Communications Budget Rationale for a Garden Tool Maker, Allocating $1.2 Million by Objective and Naming Each Activity the New Mix Displaces

The Budget and Its Purpose

Tillman Forge & Garden's communications budget for next year is fixed at $1.2 million, the same as this year. The company's strategy has changed: the pruner line is moving into Southeast garden centers, the cordless line is being tested with older gardeners and the watering line is being harvested. The communications mix has to follow. This rationale allocates the budget across five activities, explains what each is expected to achieve and at which stage of the buyer's path it works, and lists what the new mix stops doing. Kotler and Keller (2016) describe a firm's communications mix as a set of tools chosen to reach specific objectives; a mix that does not change when the strategy changes is a sign that it is not tied to objectives at all.

What this page is doingThe rationale opens by stating that the total is fixed, so every new line must be paid for by a cut elsewhere.

Allocation

Table 1

Communications Budget by Activity, This Year and Next

Activity	This year	Next year	Objective	Stage of buyer's path \|
Retailer cooperative advertising	30 percent	25 percent	Keep forged tools featured in garden center flyers	Purchase \|
Search and online video demonstrations	20 percent	32 percent	Show pruner comfort and cordless ease to buyers researching online	Consideration \|
Trade show presence	15 percent	8 percent	Meet new Southeast garden center buyers	Awareness among retailers \|
Printed catalogs	25 percent	10 percent	Serve existing retailers who still order from print	Purchase \|
In-store demonstrations and sampling	10 percent	25 percent	Let gardeners hold the pruners and try cordless tools	Consideration and purchase \|

Composite company. Shares of a $1.2 million total; this year's figures from the case.

Why Each Line Moves

Search and online video rise from 20 to 32 percent because the situation analysis found search interest in ergonomic pruners up about a third in two years, and because both lines Tillman is building depend on buyers seeing the tools in use. Short videos showing a gardener with arthritis using the pruners, or a retiree turning a bed with the cordless cultivator, explain the product's advantage better than a catalog page can.

In-store demonstrations rise from 10 to 25 percent because the pruners' advantage is felt in the hand. The Southeast entry depends on demonstration units and trained garden center staff; this line funds the demonstrations, while the entry budget covers the fixtures.

Retailer cooperative advertising falls from 30 to 25 percent. It mainly supports forged tools, a line the portfolio review chose to hold rather than grow. A modest cut keeps forged tools in garden center flyers while freeing money for growth.

Sethuraman et al. (2011), in a meta-analysis of brand advertising studies, reported that advertising moves sales by a real but small amount on average, with bigger effects for newer products and early in a product's life cycle. That finding supports moving money toward the pruners in a new region and the cordless line, and away from the long-established forged line.

What the New Mix Displaces

Three things that Tillman did this year will not happen next year. First, Tillman will drop one of its two regional trade shows, the Midwest Lawn and Garden Expo, and keep only the Southeast show, where new garden center buyers are. The Midwest show mainly served existing customers who already know the company. Second, the printed catalog will be cut from 40 pages to a 12-page forged-tools edition, mailed only to retailers who ordered from print last year; everyone else will use the online catalog. Third, all marketing for the watering line ends, including its two pages in the catalog and its share of cooperative advertising. These cuts total about $340,000, which pays for the increases in online video and in-store demonstrations.

Each displaced activity has someone who valued it. The Midwest sales representative used the expo to see accounts, and some long-standing retailers prefer the full printed catalog. The sales team should hear about these changes before the retailers do, with an explanation of where the money went.

What this page is doingDisplaced activities are named plainly, because a budget that only lists additions hides its real decisions.

Expected Returns

The rationale does not promise precise returns, because the case gives no reliable figures for them. It sets expectations that can be checked: online video views among visitors to garden-related websites in the Southeast, demonstration counts at new stores, and pruner and cordless sales in stores with and without demonstrations. Binet and Field (2013) argue that brand building pays off over years while activation pays off within weeks, so a budget needs both; the forged line's cooperative advertising is the activation, and the online video for new lines is the brand-building.

References

Binet, L., & Field, P. (2013). The long and the short of it: Balancing short and long-term marketing strategies. Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Sethuraman, R., Tellis, G. J., & Briesch, R. A. (2011). How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.457

What the MRKT 4501 Week 8 instructions ask for

Week 8 asks you to allocate a fixed communications budget and justify it. Present the allocation in a table that shows each activity's share this year and next, the objective it serves and the stage of the buyer's path it targets. Explain why each line rises or falls, linking the changes to your company's strategy and to research on how promotion works. Name plainly what the new mix stops doing, who valued those activities and how they will be told. Avoid promising precise returns the case cannot support; instead, set out what you will check to see whether each change is working. Remember that the total is fixed, so every increase must be paid for by a cut somewhere else.

How this MRKT 4501 Week 8 example is built

The rationale opens by noting that the $1.2 million total is fixed and the strategy has changed, citing Kotler and Keller. A table shows five activities with this year's and next year's shares, objectives and funnel stages. A section explains the rise in online video and demonstrations and the cut in cooperative advertising, citing Sethuraman and colleagues on where advertising works best. A section lists three displaced activities worth about $340,000 and who valued them. A closing section sets out what will be checked rather than promising returns, citing Binet and Field on balancing brand-building and activation.

Reading the MRKT 4501 Week 8 rubric

Budget rationales are evaluated on whether allocations follow the strategy and whether cuts are acknowledged. A table showing both years, objectives and stages earns credit. Explaining each shift with reference to strategy and research is weighted heavily. Naming the displaced activities, their value to someone and how the change will be communicated shows honesty and practical sense. Setting checks rather than inventing returns shows integrity. Recognizing different time horizons for brand-building and activation shows depth. Rationales that list new activities without saying what they replace, claim precise returns without data or leave last year's mix unchanged despite a new strategy tend to receive lower marks. Tables that add up to the stated total are expected.

MRKT 4501 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost marks

Start with last year's budget and your company's strategy for this year. For each activity, ask whether it serves a line or a buyer you are now trying to reach. Move money toward those that do and away from those that do not, and write down where every dollar of the increase comes from. Then make a short list of what will no longer happen and who will notice. Students often add new activities without cutting anything, which a fixed budget cannot allow. Another frequent weakness is promising returns the case gives no basis for. Say what you will measure instead. If you are unsure how to tie an activity to a stage of the buyer's path, our writers can help you map your mix.

Get a MRKT 4501 Week 8 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 8 prompt, its rubric and your case's budget total, and a rationale allocating that total, with every displaced activity named, lands inside 24 to 48 hours; nothing is charged for a first request. If last year's allocation is in the case, the table sets the two years side by side.

More MRKT 4501 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MRKT 4501 Week 8 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MRKT 4501 Week 8 sample paper?

The communications budget rationale is free to read in full below.

How large is the MRKT 4501 Week 8 budget?

A fixed $1.2 million, the same as the previous year.

Which activities grow?

Online video demonstrations and in-store demonstrations, which show the growth lines in use.

What does the new mix stop doing?

A regional trade show, most of the printed catalog and all marketing for watering products.

Why are returns not promised precisely?

The case gives no reliable basis, so the rationale sets checks instead.