MRKT 4501 Week 6 Pricing Decision Paper Example

Marketing Management Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MRKT 4501 Week 6 pricing decision example treats a price change as a spending decision in disguise. Walden MRKT 4501 asks students to recommend and test a price change, so the composite garden tool maker proposes raising its forged spade's wholesale price by 5 percent, from $28.00 to $29.40, to rebuild margin squeezed by steel costs and fund growth elsewhere. A table sets out price, variable cost, contribution margin and volume. The paper then works out, step by step, that the firm can lose about 10.4 percent of unit sales before the change stops paying, and argues that a durable tool with a lifetime warranty is unlikely to lose that much. Retailer and rival reactions are weighed, including a rival's website discount, drawing on Rao, Bergen and Davis. A reversal point at 8 percent is set in advance, for the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMRKT 4501 Marketing Management
WeekWeek 6
Paper typePricing decision
LengthAbout 800 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MRKT 4501 Week 6

1

Raising the Forged Spade's Wholesale Price by Five Percent: A Pricing Decision Weighed on Margin and Volume Together, With the Sales Loss the Change Can Absorb Before It Stops Paying

Student Name

Walden University

MRKT 4501: Marketing Management

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the change and the single calculation that decides whether it is worth making.
2

Raising the Forged Spade's Wholesale Price by Five Percent: A Pricing Decision Weighed on Margin and Volume Together, With the Sales Loss the Change Can Absorb Before It Stops Paying

The Recommended Change

Tillman Forge & Garden should raise the wholesale price of its forged steel spade by 5 percent, from $28.00 to $29.40, effective with the fall order cycle. The spade is the best-selling item in the forged line, which the portfolio review placed as a cash cow whose margin funds growth elsewhere. A jump of about nine percent in steel costs last year has squeezed the spade's margin. A modest price increase restores some of that margin to fund the pruner expansion. Nagle and Müller describe pricing as a strategic decision that should be judged by its effect on profit, not on volume or share alone (Nagle & Müller, 2018), and this paper judges the change that way.

What this page is doingThe recommendation and its reason come first, because a price change is a spending decision in disguise.
3

The Numbers

If volume holds, the change adds about $364,000 in contribution. Volume will not hold entirely, so the real question is how much volume the firm can lose before the change stops paying.

Table 1

Current and Proposed Spade Economics

ItemCurrentProposed |
Wholesale price per spade$28.00$29.40 |
Variable cost per spade (steel, labor, packaging, freight)$16.00$16.00 |
Contribution margin per spade$12.00$13.40 |
Annual unit volume260,000To be determined |
Total contribution$3,120,000$3,484,000 if volume holds |

Composite company. Figures are illustrative case data.

How Much Volume Can Be Lost

To keep total contribution at the current $3,120,000 with a margin of $13.40 per spade, Tillman needs to sell $3,120,000 divided by $13.40, or about 232,800 spades. That is about 27,200 fewer than today, a drop of roughly 10.4 percent. As a rule of thumb, the share of volume a firm can give up is the price rise over the new unit margin: $1.40 divided by $13.40, or 10.4 percent. If unit sales fall by less than 10.4 percent, the price increase earns more than the current price; if they fall by more, it earns less.

How likely is a drop of more than 10 percent? For a 5 percent price increase to cut volume by more than 10 percent, buyers would need to be very price sensitive, with an elasticity worse than about negative 2. Three things in the case suggest they are not. Forged spades are a durable purchase that gardeners make rarely, so the price difference is small relative to how long the tool lasts. Tillman's lifetime warranty gives buyers a reason to pay more. And the steel cost increase affects every maker of forged tools, so rivals are likely to raise prices as well.

What this page is doingThe break-even calculation is shown step by step, so the finance committee can check it.
4

Rival and Retailer Reactions

The independent garden centers will likely pass the increase through to shelf prices, raising the retail price from about $48 to about $50. Some may push back if their margin percentage shrinks; Tillman should hold its suggested retail markup constant so retailers keep their usual margin in percentage terms. The farm-and-home chain, which is developing its own private label, is the main risk: it could use the increase as a reason to give more shelf space to its own spade. Tillman's sales team should present the increase with the steel cost data before the fall orders, rather than letting the chain discover it on an invoice.

Brannock Outdoor, the main rival in forged tools, cut its website price on forged spades by 15 percent this spring. If Brannock extends the cut to retail, Tillman's increase could lose more volume than estimated. Rao et al. (2000) found that price wars destroy value for everyone involved and that firms are often better off not matching cuts that target segments they do not depend on; Tillman's buyers mostly shop at garden centers, not on Brannock's website.

When to Reverse

The paper sets a reversal point in advance. If spade unit sales in the first two quarters after the change fall by more than 8 percent compared with the same quarters last year, with no matching drop in the category, the price should return to $28.00 for the next order cycle. The 8 percent trigger sits below the 10.4 percent break-even so that the reversal happens while the change is still roughly breaking even, rather than after it has started losing money.

What the Change Funds

If volume falls by about 4 percent, a reasonable estimate for a durable tool with a warranty, contribution would rise to about $3,345,000, or about $225,000 more than today. That sum covers more than half the cost of the pruner entry into Southeast garden centers, which is why the change is worth making now. Kotler and Keller (2016) describe price as the one element of the marketing mix that produces revenue rather than cost; here it also funds the strategy.

References

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Nagle, T. T., & Müller, G. (2018). The strategy and tactics of pricing: A guide to growing more profitably (6th ed.). Routledge.

Rao, A. R., Bergen, M. E., & Davis, S. (2000). How to fight a price war. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 107-116.

Reading the MRKT 4501 Week 6 instructions

Week 6 asks you to recommend one price change for a product in your case and test it. State the change and the reason for it at the start. Set out the current and proposed price, variable cost, contribution margin and volume in a small table. Calculate how much volume the company could lose before the change reduces total contribution, and show the steps. Discuss how likely that loss is, using what you know about the product and its buyers. Consider how retailers and rivals may react and how the company should handle them. Set a point at which the change would be reversed, ideally before the break-even loss is reached, and say what the change would fund if it works.

Inside the MRKT 4501 Week 6 example

The paper opens with the recommended 5 percent increase and the steel-cost reason, citing Nagle and Müller. A table shows margin rising from $12.00 to $13.40 a spade. A section calculates the break-even volume drop of about 10.4 percent, showing the formula. A section explains why buyers are unlikely to be that price sensitive, citing the warranty and rising costs across the industry. A section weighs reactions from garden centers, the farm-and-home chain and a rival, citing Rao and colleagues on price wars. A section sets a reversal trigger at 8 percent, and a final section estimates the added contribution, citing Kotler and Keller.

Where the marks sit in the MRKT 4501 Week 6 rubric

Pricing decisions are marked on whether the calculation is correct and the judgment is reasoned. A clear recommendation with its rationale earns credit. A table with the figures needed for the calculation shows organization. A correctly worked break-even volume change, with steps shown, is weighted heavily. Reasoning about price sensitivity from the product's characteristics and the market shows judgment beyond arithmetic. Considering retailer and rival reactions, with practical responses, shows awareness of the channel. A reversal point set before results arrive demonstrates discipline. Papers that recommend a price change without calculating its effect on contribution, or ignore how partners will respond, tend to receive lower marks. Rounded figures are fine if the paper says they are rounded.

MRKT 4501 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost marks

Begin by writing down the current price, the variable cost per unit and the volume, then work out the margin per unit before and after the change. The key number is the percentage of volume you can lose before total margin falls: the price change divided by the new margin per unit. Then ask whether your buyers are likely to react that strongly, using what you know about the product, its competitors and how often people buy it. Students often argue that a price increase is fine because buyers are loyal, without calculating how much loss the firm can bear. Another frequent gap is setting no reversal point. If the case figures confuse you, our writers can walk through the calculation step by step with you.

Get a MRKT 4501 Week 6 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 6 pricing prompt, the rubric and whatever cost and volume figures your case provides; a pricing decision computed from those numbers comes back within 24 to 48 hours, and the first is free. If your case covers a service rather than a product, the same margin-and-volume test is applied to it.

More MRKT 4501 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MRKT 4501 Week 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MRKT 4501 Week 6 sample paper?

The pricing decision paper is posted below and is free of charge to read.

What price change does the MRKT 4501 Week 6 paper recommend?

Raising the forged spade's wholesale price by 5 percent, from $28.00 to $29.40.

How much volume can be lost before the change stops paying?

About 10.4 percent, the price change divided by the new margin per unit.

Why are buyers unlikely to lose that much?

Spades are durable, rarely bought, backed by a lifetime warranty and facing industry-wide cost increases.

When would the change be reversed?

If unit sales fall more than 8 percent over two quarters without a matching category decline.