MHRM 6902 Week 2 Portfolio Evidence Plan Example

Capstone: Meeting SHRM Competencies Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MHRM 6902 Week 2 evidence plan example inventories fourteen pieces of work held by a composite HR generalist at a property management company before claiming any of them. Walden MHRM 6902 asks students to find their evidence early, so the plan lists each artifact with its date, its form, the BASK categories it might support and its release status: hers to use, usable with a supervisor's permission or usable only as a description. A second table reads the same items by category, turning past work into a coverage map with two bare rows, Global Mindset and the budgeting side of Business Acumen. Van Tartwijk and Driessen on why portfolios fail at collection and Rousseau and Barends on evidence-based HR frame the method. A third table closes with dated collection actions and a named approver for each, in a plan prepared for the MS in Human Resource Management.

CourseMHRM 6902 Capstone: Meeting SHRM Competencies
WeekWeek 2
Paper typeEvidence plan
LengthAbout 980 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMS in Human Resource Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MHRM 6902 Week 2

1

Fourteen Artifacts, Their Release Status and the Two Bare Rows: An Evidence Plan for a Property Management Generalist's SHRM Competency Portfolio

Student Name

Walden University

MHRM 6902: Capstone: Meeting SHRM Competencies

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title gives the count, the column that governs everything later and the finding the plan was built to expose.
2

Fourteen Artifacts, Their Release Status and the Two Bare Rows: An Evidence Plan for a Property Management Generalist's SHRM Competency Portfolio

Purpose of the Plan

My Week 1 self-assessment rated each BASK row by the evidence I believed I held. This plan checks that belief against what actually sits in my files. Over four years as the sole generalist at Sorrel Ridge Residential, my work has scattered across a shared drive, my email, the regional office's policy binder and two laptops. Van Tartwijk and Driessen (2009) note that portfolios fail most often at the collection stage, when learners gather whatever is close at hand instead of what the standard asks for. I therefore inventoried everything first, recorded what I may use, and only then asked which competencies each item could support.

What this page is doingThe plan states what it is for before listing anything, so the inventory reads as a means and not as a résumé.
3

Inventory

Release status sorts the items into three groups. Nine are mine to use as they are, because they contain no personal data and were written for internal audiences that the HR director has said I may share in coursework. Four need my supervisor's permission because they carry figures the company treats as confidential, such as turnover counts by community or pay ranges. One, the investigation summary, may appear only as a description, since the employees involved were promised confidentiality. A described artifact is weaker evidence, because the reader must trust my account of it, and the plan treats it that way from the start.

Table 1

Inventory of Held Artifacts

No.ArtifactDateFormCategories it might supportRelease status |
1Onboarding checklist and pairing program for maintenance technicians2024Checklist, schedulePeople domain, ConsultationMine to use |
2Turnover analysis for leasing agents2023Spreadsheet, two-page briefAnalytical Aptitude, Business AcumenSupervisor permission |
3Benefits guide and sessions in Spanish and English2024Guide, slides, sign-in countsCommunication, Inclusion and DiversityMine to use |
4Staffing-options memo on leasing office hours2025MemoConsultation, Business AcumenSupervisor permission |
5Harassment investigation summary2024ReportEthical PracticeDescription only |
6Remote work policy revision for regional office2023Policy, rollout emailLeadership and Navigation, Workplace domainMine to use |
7On-call pay section of the employee handbook2025Handbook sectionWorkplace domainMine to use |
8Documentation training for community managers2024Slides, exerciseRelationship Management, CommunicationMine to use |
9Job description rewrites for assistant managers2023Four descriptionsOrganization domainMine to use |
10Open enrollment communication calendar2025Calendar, emailsCommunicationMine to use |
11Exit interview form redesign2023FormAnalytical AptitudeMine to use |
12HR records cleanup report2022ReportOrganization domainSupervisor permission |
13Leasing agent pay comparison2024Table, summaryBusiness Acumen, People domainSupervisor permission |
14Recognition program proposal, not adopted2025ProposalRelationship ManagementMine to use |

Composite generalist and organization. Categories in the fifth column are candidates only; Week 3 onward tests each against the standard's behaviors.

What this page is doingRelease status gets its own column because permission decides how strong each item can be as evidence.
4

The Same Evidence, Read by Category

The inverted table shows what the inventory hides. Communication and Analytical Aptitude each have several items, which matches the Week 1 ratings. Two rows are empty or nearly so. Global Mindset has nothing at all. Business Acumen has three items, but every one concerns costs or pay comparisons; nothing touches building or managing a budget, which the competency's business analysis behaviors clearly include (Society for Human Resource Management [SHRM], 2022). Those two rows become the plan's collection targets.

Table 2

BASK Categories and the Artifacts Pointing at Each

BASK categoryArtifactsCoverage |
Leadership and Navigation6Thin |
Ethical Practice5 (description only)Thin |
Inclusion and Diversity3Thin |
Relationship Management8, 14Moderate |
Communication3, 8, 10Strong |
Global MindsetNoneBare |
Business Acumen2, 4, 13 (cost and pay only)Bare on budgets |
Consultation1, 4Moderate |
Analytical Aptitude2, 11Strong |
People, Organization and Workplace domains1, 7, 9, 12, 13Moderate to strong |

Coverage labels are my own judgments and will change as artifacts are tested against key behaviors.

What this page is doingReading by category turns a list of work into a map of coverage, and the empty cells become collection targets.
5

Gaps the Inventory Cannot Fill

No amount of searching my files will produce a global artifact, because Sorrel Ridge has done no work outside the United States while I have been there. The company is, however, preparing to contract after-hours leasing calls to a support vendor based overseas, and the operations vice president has asked HR to help prepare the vendor's staff. That project is the only realistic source of Global Mindset evidence this year. Budget evidence is similar: the controller builds the company budget each autumn, and the HR director has submitted the HR line alone until now. Rousseau and Barends (2011) encourage HR practitioners to ask what evidence a decision actually requires before collecting more; here, the decision is whether I can claim these competencies, and the answer requires new work, not better filing.

Collection Actions

Each action names the person whose agreement it needs, because a request without a named approver tends to sit unanswered. The two final actions are requests for new work rather than releases of old work, and the development plan later in the course will carry them forward if they are granted.

Table 3

Collection Actions With Dates and Approvers

ActionByApprover |
Request release of the turnover analysis and the pay comparison for courseworkEnd of Week 3Regional director of operations |
Request release of the staffing-options memo and the manager's reply emailEnd of Week 3Regional manager, Tucson |
Write the investigation description and have its wording clearedWeek 4HR director |
Ask to join the offshore leasing support onboarding projectWeek 5Vice president of operations |
Ask for a seat in this year's budget cycle beside the controllerWeek 6Controller and HR director |

Dates refer to course weeks. Items without an approver are already mine to use.

References

Rousseau, D. M., & Barends, E. G. R. (2011). Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2011.00173.x

Society for Human Resource Management. (2022). SHRM body of applied skills and knowledge (SHRM BASK). https://www.shrm.org/credentials/certification/shrm-bask

Van Tartwijk, J., & Driessen, E. W. (2009). Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Medical Teacher, 31(9), 790-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903139201

The Walden MHRM 6902 Week 2 instructions

Week 2 asks you to plan how you will gather evidence for your competency portfolio. Begin with an inventory of everything you already hold, giving each item a date and a form so a reader knows what kind of evidence it is. Record whether you may use each item, need permission or may only describe it, since that decides how strong it can be. Then reverse the view: list the competency categories and the items pointing at each, so the empty categories become visible. Explain which gaps your files cannot fill and why. End with collection actions, each carrying a date and the name of the person whose agreement it needs.

How this MHRM 6902 Week 2 example is built

The plan begins by explaining why it inventories before it claims, citing Van Tartwijk and Driessen. The first table lists fourteen artifacts, from a technician onboarding checklist to a recognition proposal that was never adopted, with release status in its own column. A paragraph sorts the items into nine usable, four needing permission and one described only. The second table lists each category with its artifacts and a coverage label, exposing Global Mindset and budgets. A section explains that only new work can fill those rows, pointing to an offshore vendor project and the company budget cycle, and cites Rousseau and Barends. A third table gives five dated actions with approvers.

Where the marks sit in the MHRM 6902 Week 2 rubric

Evidence plans are marked on completeness and on how clearly they turn an inventory into decisions. A full inventory with dates and forms earns credit. Recording release status before any claim is made shows professional care with confidential material and is weighted heavily. Reading the evidence by category, so that empty rows appear, demonstrates the analysis the course expects. Distinguishing gaps that better filing could fix from gaps that need new work shows judgment. Collection actions with dates and named approvers make the plan usable. Plans that list only the writer's best work, ignore permissions or end without a schedule receive lower marks, because they postpone the problems the portfolio will meet later.

MHRM 6902 Week 2 help from the desk

Spend an hour searching your shared drives, email and old laptops before writing anything, and list every document you created that someone else used. Add the year and what form it takes. Next to each, write whether your employer would let a classmate read it. Then turn the list around: under each competency name, write the numbers of the items that might support it. Empty rows are your real findings. Many students skip permissions until the final week and discover that their best artifact cannot be shown. Ask early, in writing, and name the person you asked. Our team can help you sort a long inventory into categories if your list has grown past what one table holds comfortably.

Get a MHRM 6902 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Share the evidence plan instructions and rubric; add a rough list of the work you might draw on, however informal. The plan inventories it, labels what needs permission, reads the result by category to find what is bare, and comes back within 24 to 48 hours; the first costs nothing. The property management company and the generalist working there were assembled for this example.

More MHRM 6902 papers and MS in Human Resource Management samples

MHRM 6902 Week 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MHRM 6902 Week 2 sample paper?

The complete evidence plan, with all three tables, can be read below for free.

How many artifacts does the MHRM 6902 Week 2 plan inventory?

Fourteen, each with a date, a form, candidate categories and a release status.

What are the three release statuses?

Mine to use, usable with a supervisor's permission and usable only as a description.

Which categories come out bare?

Global Mindset and the budgeting side of Business Acumen.

How are the bare rows to be filled?

Through new work: an offshore vendor onboarding project and a seat in the budget cycle.