| Course | MHRM 6902 Capstone: Meeting SHRM Competencies |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | Evidence plan |
| Length | About 980 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Human Resource Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MHRM 6902 Week 2
Fourteen Artifacts, Their Release Status and the Two Bare Rows: An Evidence Plan for a Property Management Generalist's SHRM Competency Portfolio
Student Name
Walden University
MHRM 6902: Capstone: Meeting SHRM Competencies
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Fourteen Artifacts, Their Release Status and the Two Bare Rows: An Evidence Plan for a Property Management Generalist's SHRM Competency Portfolio
Purpose of the Plan
My Week 1 self-assessment rated each BASK row by the evidence I believed I held. This plan checks that belief against what actually sits in my files. Over four years as the sole generalist at Sorrel Ridge Residential, my work has scattered across a shared drive, my email, the regional office's policy binder and two laptops. Van Tartwijk and Driessen (2009) note that portfolios fail most often at the collection stage, when learners gather whatever is close at hand instead of what the standard asks for. I therefore inventoried everything first, recorded what I may use, and only then asked which competencies each item could support.
Inventory
Release status sorts the items into three groups. Nine are mine to use as they are, because they contain no personal data and were written for internal audiences that the HR director has said I may share in coursework. Four need my supervisor's permission because they carry figures the company treats as confidential, such as turnover counts by community or pay ranges. One, the investigation summary, may appear only as a description, since the employees involved were promised confidentiality. A described artifact is weaker evidence, because the reader must trust my account of it, and the plan treats it that way from the start.
Table 1
Inventory of Held Artifacts
| No. | Artifact | Date | Form | Categories it might support | Release status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Onboarding checklist and pairing program for maintenance technicians | 2024 | Checklist, schedule | People domain, Consultation | Mine to use | |
| 2 | Turnover analysis for leasing agents | 2023 | Spreadsheet, two-page brief | Analytical Aptitude, Business Acumen | Supervisor permission | |
| 3 | Benefits guide and sessions in Spanish and English | 2024 | Guide, slides, sign-in counts | Communication, Inclusion and Diversity | Mine to use | |
| 4 | Staffing-options memo on leasing office hours | 2025 | Memo | Consultation, Business Acumen | Supervisor permission | |
| 5 | Harassment investigation summary | 2024 | Report | Ethical Practice | Description only | |
| 6 | Remote work policy revision for regional office | 2023 | Policy, rollout email | Leadership and Navigation, Workplace domain | Mine to use | |
| 7 | On-call pay section of the employee handbook | 2025 | Handbook section | Workplace domain | Mine to use | |
| 8 | Documentation training for community managers | 2024 | Slides, exercise | Relationship Management, Communication | Mine to use | |
| 9 | Job description rewrites for assistant managers | 2023 | Four descriptions | Organization domain | Mine to use | |
| 10 | Open enrollment communication calendar | 2025 | Calendar, emails | Communication | Mine to use | |
| 11 | Exit interview form redesign | 2023 | Form | Analytical Aptitude | Mine to use | |
| 12 | HR records cleanup report | 2022 | Report | Organization domain | Supervisor permission | |
| 13 | Leasing agent pay comparison | 2024 | Table, summary | Business Acumen, People domain | Supervisor permission | |
| 14 | Recognition program proposal, not adopted | 2025 | Proposal | Relationship Management | Mine to use | |
Composite generalist and organization. Categories in the fifth column are candidates only; Week 3 onward tests each against the standard's behaviors.
The Same Evidence, Read by Category
The inverted table shows what the inventory hides. Communication and Analytical Aptitude each have several items, which matches the Week 1 ratings. Two rows are empty or nearly so. Global Mindset has nothing at all. Business Acumen has three items, but every one concerns costs or pay comparisons; nothing touches building or managing a budget, which the competency's business analysis behaviors clearly include (Society for Human Resource Management [SHRM], 2022). Those two rows become the plan's collection targets.
Table 2
BASK Categories and the Artifacts Pointing at Each
| BASK category | Artifacts | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership and Navigation | 6 | Thin | |
| Ethical Practice | 5 (description only) | Thin | |
| Inclusion and Diversity | 3 | Thin | |
| Relationship Management | 8, 14 | Moderate | |
| Communication | 3, 8, 10 | Strong | |
| Global Mindset | None | Bare | |
| Business Acumen | 2, 4, 13 (cost and pay only) | Bare on budgets | |
| Consultation | 1, 4 | Moderate | |
| Analytical Aptitude | 2, 11 | Strong | |
| People, Organization and Workplace domains | 1, 7, 9, 12, 13 | Moderate to strong | |
Coverage labels are my own judgments and will change as artifacts are tested against key behaviors.
Gaps the Inventory Cannot Fill
No amount of searching my files will produce a global artifact, because Sorrel Ridge has done no work outside the United States while I have been there. The company is, however, preparing to contract after-hours leasing calls to a support vendor based overseas, and the operations vice president has asked HR to help prepare the vendor's staff. That project is the only realistic source of Global Mindset evidence this year. Budget evidence is similar: the controller builds the company budget each autumn, and the HR director has submitted the HR line alone until now. Rousseau and Barends (2011) encourage HR practitioners to ask what evidence a decision actually requires before collecting more; here, the decision is whether I can claim these competencies, and the answer requires new work, not better filing.
Collection Actions
Each action names the person whose agreement it needs, because a request without a named approver tends to sit unanswered. The two final actions are requests for new work rather than releases of old work, and the development plan later in the course will carry them forward if they are granted.
Table 3
Collection Actions With Dates and Approvers
| Action | By | Approver | |
|---|---|---|
| Request release of the turnover analysis and the pay comparison for coursework | End of Week 3 | Regional director of operations | |
| Request release of the staffing-options memo and the manager's reply email | End of Week 3 | Regional manager, Tucson | |
| Write the investigation description and have its wording cleared | Week 4 | HR director | |
| Ask to join the offshore leasing support onboarding project | Week 5 | Vice president of operations | |
| Ask for a seat in this year's budget cycle beside the controller | Week 6 | Controller and HR director | |
Dates refer to course weeks. Items without an approver are already mine to use.
References
Rousseau, D. M., & Barends, E. G. R. (2011). Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2011.00173.x
Society for Human Resource Management. (2022). SHRM body of applied skills and knowledge (SHRM BASK). https://www.shrm.org/credentials/certification/shrm-bask
Van Tartwijk, J., & Driessen, E. W. (2009). Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Medical Teacher, 31(9), 790-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903139201
The Walden MHRM 6902 Week 2 instructions
Week 2 asks you to plan how you will gather evidence for your competency portfolio. Begin with an inventory of everything you already hold, giving each item a date and a form so a reader knows what kind of evidence it is. Record whether you may use each item, need permission or may only describe it, since that decides how strong it can be. Then reverse the view: list the competency categories and the items pointing at each, so the empty categories become visible. Explain which gaps your files cannot fill and why. End with collection actions, each carrying a date and the name of the person whose agreement it needs.
How this MHRM 6902 Week 2 example is built
The plan begins by explaining why it inventories before it claims, citing Van Tartwijk and Driessen. The first table lists fourteen artifacts, from a technician onboarding checklist to a recognition proposal that was never adopted, with release status in its own column. A paragraph sorts the items into nine usable, four needing permission and one described only. The second table lists each category with its artifacts and a coverage label, exposing Global Mindset and budgets. A section explains that only new work can fill those rows, pointing to an offshore vendor project and the company budget cycle, and cites Rousseau and Barends. A third table gives five dated actions with approvers.
Where the marks sit in the MHRM 6902 Week 2 rubric
Evidence plans are marked on completeness and on how clearly they turn an inventory into decisions. A full inventory with dates and forms earns credit. Recording release status before any claim is made shows professional care with confidential material and is weighted heavily. Reading the evidence by category, so that empty rows appear, demonstrates the analysis the course expects. Distinguishing gaps that better filing could fix from gaps that need new work shows judgment. Collection actions with dates and named approvers make the plan usable. Plans that list only the writer's best work, ignore permissions or end without a schedule receive lower marks, because they postpone the problems the portfolio will meet later.
MHRM 6902 Week 2 help from the desk
Spend an hour searching your shared drives, email and old laptops before writing anything, and list every document you created that someone else used. Add the year and what form it takes. Next to each, write whether your employer would let a classmate read it. Then turn the list around: under each competency name, write the numbers of the items that might support it. Empty rows are your real findings. Many students skip permissions until the final week and discover that their best artifact cannot be shown. Ask early, in writing, and name the person you asked. Our team can help you sort a long inventory into categories if your list has grown past what one table holds comfortably.
Get a MHRM 6902 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Share the evidence plan instructions and rubric; add a rough list of the work you might draw on, however informal. The plan inventories it, labels what needs permission, reads the result by category to find what is bare, and comes back within 24 to 48 hours; the first costs nothing. The property management company and the generalist working there were assembled for this example.
More MHRM 6902 papers and MS in Human Resource Management samples
- MHRM 6902 Week 1: SHRM BASK Self-Assessment
- MHRM 6902 Week 3: Analytical Aptitude Competency Map
- MHRM 6902 Week 4: Artifact Narrative
- MHRM 6902 Week 5: Competency Claim Discussion Post
- MHRM 6902 Week 6: Global Mindset Gap Statement
- MHRM 6902 Week 7: Six-Category Mapping Pass
- MHRM 6902 Week 8: Competency Portfolio Draft
- MHRM 6902 Week 9: Professional Development Plan
- MHRM 6902 Week 10: Portfolio Revision Ledger
- MHRM 6902 Week 11: Final Competency Portfolio
- MHRM 6901 Week 2: Capstone Organizational Profile
- MHRM 6801 Week 2: Process Observation Memo
- MHRM 6101 Week 2: HR Function Role Brief
- MHRM 6751 Week 2: Host Country Labor Market Brief
MHRM 6902 Week 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MHRM 6902 Week 2 sample paper?
The complete evidence plan, with all three tables, can be read below for free.
How many artifacts does the MHRM 6902 Week 2 plan inventory?
Fourteen, each with a date, a form, candidate categories and a release status.
What are the three release statuses?
Mine to use, usable with a supervisor's permission and usable only as a description.
Which categories come out bare?
Global Mindset and the budgeting side of Business Acumen.
How are the bare rows to be filled?
Through new work: an offshore vendor onboarding project and a seat in the budget cycle.