Six categories mapped together, one turnover analysis found claimed three times, and a rule giving every artifact a primary home: that is the mapping pass MHRM 6902 sets in Week 7. Searches like "mhrm 6902 week 7 assignment example", "mhrm6902 week 7 sample" and "mhrm 6902 week 7 example" land here.
What a finished MHRM 6902 Week 7 mapping pass looks like
A matrix and three pages of notes. The matrix sets eight artifacts across the top and six categories down the side: Communication, Relationship Management, Consultation, Analytical Aptitude, Business Acumen and Ethical Practice. Each cell holds P for primary, S for secondary, or nothing. Before the pass, the turnover analysis carried marks in Analytical Aptitude, Business Acumen and Consultation. After it, the analysis is primary for Analytical Aptitude only, secondary for Business Acumen limited to its cost estimate, and removed from Consultation, where the staffing-options memo does the work. The notes explain each change in a paragraph. A final rule, stated in one sentence, governs the portfolio: every artifact has one primary category, and a secondary use must name the specific part of the artifact it relies on.
How a MHRM 6902 Week 7 example is structured
The matrix comes first because overlap is only visible when every artifact and every category share one grid. Artifacts run across the top in the order they were produced, and categories run down the side in the standard's order, so neither axis favors a conclusion. The before-and-after comparison for the turnover analysis carries the pass's central argument: an artifact claimed under three categories is being asked to prove three different things, and a reader will judge it by its weakest match. The notes take each reassignment in turn and give its reason. The closing rule is stated last because it emerges from the cases above it; stated first, it would read as a policy imposed on the evidence instead of a conclusion drawn from it.
Eight across, six down
Artifacts in the order they were made, categories in the standard's order. Neither arrangement leans toward the result.
One analysis, three claims
Before the pass, the turnover analysis sat under Analytical Aptitude, Business Acumen and Consultation. Three categories were asking one spreadsheet to prove three things.
Primary, secondary, removed
Analytical Aptitude keeps it as primary. Business Acumen uses only its cost estimate. Consultation gives it up to the staffing-options memo.
A part named for each secondary
A secondary mark must say which part of the artifact it relies on. Absent that, double counting and a genuine second use look identical.
The rule, stated last
One primary category per artifact, and every secondary use names its part. The rule closes the pass because the cases above produced it.
Where marks go in MHRM 6902 Week 7
The matrix is scanned for any artifact carrying too many marks, and then the notes are read to see whether the author noticed the same thing. Overlap identified and resolved earns the largest share. Resolution by deletion alone, dropping secondary uses without explanation, earns less than reasoned reassignment. Secondary uses are credited when they name the part of the artifact they rely on, and a secondary mark with no specified part is treated as double counting. Category names must match the standard. The notes are weighed for brevity and reasoning in equal measure. A matrix where one artifact still carries three primary marks after the pass shows the rule stated and then ignored, and that contradiction costs more than the overlap would have alone.
Get a MHRM 6902 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Share the mapping prompt and rubric, your list of artifacts, and the categories each has been tried against. A matrix of primary and secondary uses, reasoned notes on each reassignment and a rule for the whole portfolio are returned in 24 to 48 hours, the first without charge. Every artifact in the grid is fictional, like the generalist who holds them.
MHRM 6902 Week 7 questions, answered
Is it wrong to use one artifact for several categories?
No, but each use must rest on a different part of the artifact or a different behavior it shows. The sample keeps the turnover analysis in two categories, with the secondary use limited to its cost estimate. Using the same whole artifact to prove three things invites a reader to judge it by the weakest of the three matches.
How should categories with no primary artifact be handled?
Flag them for a gap statement rather than filling them with secondary uses. The sample's matrix shows Business Acumen with only a secondary mark, which confirms the budgeting gap already stated. Stretching an artifact to give every category a primary mark hides exactly what your development plan should address, and a careful reader will usually spot the stretch.
Does the matrix go in the final portfolio?
Often, as an overview near the start or as an appendix. The sample's final portfolio carries a simplified version showing primary uses only, with secondary uses explained inside each category section. Check your rubric, because some instructors want the full matrix: it displays the mapping discipline more directly than any paragraph can.