Three candidate firms, four criteria and a choice defended on evidence availability: the second-week company selection memo for MBAX 6990 picks a composite brewery that public data can describe. Searches like "mbax 6990 week 2 assignment example", "mbax6990 week 2 sample" and "mbax 6990 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished MBAX 6990 Week 2 company selection memo looks like
Two pages, formatted as an internal memo whose subject line already announces the decision. A decision paragraph opens it: the capstone will study a composite regional craft brewery. Most of the body is a grid with three candidates across the top, the brewery, a composite outdoor apparel brand and a composite regional cement maker, and four criteria down the side: whether published evidence exists for each case, whether a live sustainability decision with money attached is available, whether social effects fall on identifiable groups, and whether one author can cover the firm in a term. Each cell holds a sentence, not a score. Under it, one paragraph explains the evidence substitution the brewery requires, naming three public source types and the section each will serve. A final line requests approval by a stated date.
How a MBAX 6990 Week 2 example is structured
The decision leads because a memo exists to record one, and an instructor approving topics should not have to read to the end to learn which company was chosen. The grid follows, with candidates as columns so each criterion can be read across all three at once. Sentences replace scores in every cell, since a number would hide the reason a candidate fails, and those reasons are what later justify the choice. Criteria are ordered by how quickly each would sink the capstone, evidence first. The apparel brand fails there: its footprint sits in overseas contract factories that no public source describes at firm level. The cement maker fails on coverage, its largest emissions arising from clinker chemistry too technical to master in a term. The substitution paragraph then admits the brewery's own weakness openly, naming what replaces the reports it does not publish.
The choice in the subject line
Composite regional craft brewery, selected. An instructor reading only the header knows the outcome, and the body exists to show why.
Three candidates, four tests
Published evidence, a live decision with money attached, identifiable social effects, and a scale one author can cover. Each candidate meets a test in a sentence or fails it in one.
Where the apparel brand fell
Its footprint sits in contract factories abroad that no public source describes at firm level. Every later section would rest on guesses, so it fails the first test.
The cement maker, too technical
Its largest emissions come from the chemistry of making clinker, a subject that would consume the term before any strategy could be argued.
Public stand-ins for private reports
Industry sustainability benchmarks, the municipal water and sewer rate schedule, and a published grid emission factor replace the reporting the brewery never produced. Every source is matched to the section it will serve.
Where marks go in MBAX 6990 Week 2
Credit in a selection memo follows the evidence criterion more than any other. Graders check that each candidate's evidence cell names a kind of source someone could actually find, and a memo rating a private company highly on evidence without saying where the data comes from is treated as having skipped the week's test. The grid earns the next portion for cells that give reasons; ticks and stars earn little because they conceal the reasoning. The substitution paragraph carries real weight, since a composite or private firm is acceptable only when the gap in its reporting is filled from named public sources. Choosing a firm the author admires is not penalized as such, but criteria visibly bent toward a favorite forfeit the share reserved for judgment, and instructors tend to notice the bend.
Get a MBAX 6990 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Forward the Week 2 memo instructions and rubric, plus the companies on your shortlist. A memo that settles the choice in its subject line, tests each candidate in sentences against stated criteria, and names the public sources that will fill any reporting gap arrives within 24 to 48 hours; your first is free. All three candidate firms in the sample are fictional.
MBAX 6990 Week 2 questions, answered
Can a private or composite company pass the evidence test?
Yes, if public sources can stand in for what it does not report. The sample's brewery publishes no sustainability report, so the memo names industry benchmarks, a municipal rate schedule and a published grid emission factor as substitutes and labels its own figures illustrative. A private firm with no such stand-ins would leave your later sections with nothing to cite, which is why the test comes before the choice.
Should the memo score candidates numerically?
Scores are allowed and some rubrics ask for them, but a number alone hides the reason behind it. The sample writes a sentence in every cell, so a reader sees why the apparel brand fails on evidence rather than just that it scored low. If your instructor wants a weighted matrix, keep a short reason beneath each score so the judgment stays visible to whoever approves the choice.
What if the company chosen in Week 2 later proves unworkable?
Changing is possible early and expensive later, since every section after this one is written about the chosen firm. The sample's criteria are designed to catch unworkable choices now, so a company failing the evidence test is dropped at this stage. If your firm starts failing later, tell your instructor promptly rather than patching the gap with assertions that no source supports.