PUBH 6641 Week 4 Objectives Memo Example

Applied Project in Public Health Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This PUBH 6641 Week 4 objectives memo example turns an invented county's approved cream-screening scope into five objectives that a stranger could check, each naming who is counted, how many, which record shows it and the judging date. Walden PUBH 6641 asks students to make a project testable on paper, and the memo, addressed to an environmental health supervisor, sets targets for 300 creams screened at 12 events, a reported local contamination rate with confidence interval, follow-up of 90% of positives within 14 days, reporting of every confirmed brand and 70% of women stopping use at three months. Each target is justified by the setting or the evidence, and the memo states what the objectives do not promise. MPH students can use the four-part test on their own objectives.

CoursePUBH 6641 Applied Project in Public Health
WeekWeek 4
Paper typeObjectives memo
LengthAbout 620 words, 4 pages
FormatMemo, APA 7 citations
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Public Health (MPH)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PUBH 6641 Week 4

1

Memorandum

To: Environmental Health Supervisor, Marlow County Health Department

From: Community Health Worker and MPH Student

Date: Month Day, Year

Re: Proposed objectives for the skin cream mercury screening project

 

Why These Objectives Are Written This Way

A project exists on paper only once someone unfamiliar with it could check whether it worked. Each objective below therefore names who is counted, how many, which record will show it and the date on which it will be judged. All five follow from the scope approved last month: women aged 18 and older in Eastgate and Riverbend who apply creams sold for lightening or bought abroad, now or in the recent past. The project year runs from April 1 to March 31.

What this page is doingExplaining the four parts of each objective before listing them lets the supervisor test each one as she reads.
2

Objective 1: Creams Screened

By September 30, the project will screen at least 300 creams brought by women in the two neighborhoods, at no fewer than 12 community events or partner sites.

Record: the screening log, with one line per cream, kept by the environmental health specialist.

Why this number: a September deadline matches the outdoor festival season, when most events happen. Three hundred creams is about 25 per event, which staff from the state laboratory's earlier market pilot judged realistic.

Objective 2: Local Contamination Rate Reported

By October 31, the project will report the share of screened creams containing mercury above 1 part per million, with a 95% confidence interval, to the county health officer and the state health department.

Record: a two-page data summary, dated and sent by email.

Why: no local figure exists. An international study found 6% of skin-lightening products contained mercury above 1,000 parts per million (Hamann et al., 2014), but the local rate is unknown and may be higher or lower.

Objective 3: Confirmation and Advice for Every Positive Screen

By December 31, at least 90% of women whose cream screens above 1 part per million will have been offered a confirmatory laboratory test of the cream, advice to stop using it and a written referral to their doctor within 14 days of screening.

Record: the follow-up log, kept by the community health workers, with dates of each contact.

Why: screening without follow-up would leave women with alarming results and nowhere to go. The federal limit for mercury in cosmetics outside the eye area is trace amounts below 1 part per million (21 C.F.R. § 700.13), so any cream above it should not be used.

Objective 4: Products Reported to Regulators

By December 31, 100% of brands confirmed by the state laboratory to contain mercury above the federal limit will have been reported to the state health department, with the brand name, where it was bought and a photograph of the packaging.

Record: copies of each report and the state's acknowledgment.

Objective 5: Women Who Stopped Using a Contaminated Cream

By March 31, at least 70% of women with a confirmed contaminated cream, reached by phone three months after screening, will report that they have stopped using it.

Record: the three-month follow-up log.

Why: the purpose of screening is to end exposure. Severe poisoning has followed years of daily use, as a 2019 Sacramento case of lasting brain injury showed (Mudan et al., 2019), so stopping use is the outcome that matters most.

What These Objectives Do Not Promise

They do not promise a change in blood mercury levels, which the project does not measure, or a reduction in sales, which belongs to regulators. They also do not promise a particular contamination rate; Objective 2 reports whatever rate the screening finds.

Request

Please review these objectives by Friday. If you approve them, I will build the logic model and evaluation plan directly from them so that every later section uses the same numbers and dates.

References

Hamann, C. R., Boonchai, W., Wen, L., Sakanashi, E. N., Chu, C.-Y., Hamann, K., Hamann, C. P., Sinniah, K., & Hamann, D. (2014). Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: Is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard? Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 70(2), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.050

Mudan, A., Copan, L., Wang, R., Pugh, A., Lebin, J., Barreau, T., Jones, R. L., Ghosal, S., Lee, M., Albertson, T., Jarrett, J. M., Lee, J., Betting, D., Ward, C. D., De Leon Salazar, A., Smollin, C. G., & Blanc, P. D. (2019). Notes from the field: Methylmercury toxicity from a skin lightening cream obtained from Mexico, California, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(50), 1166-1167. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6850a4

Use of Mercury Compounds in Cosmetics, 21 C.F.R. § 700.13 (2024).

What the PUBH 6641 Week 4 instructions ask for

Objectives assignments ask students to translate their project's scope into specific, measurable objectives. Prompts usually require three to six objectives in SMART form or a similar structure, with targets, deadlines, data sources and a brief rationale for each. Many instructors ask for a memo to a supervisor or sponsor, so the objectives can be approved before later sections are built on them. Expect two pages. Instructors reward objectives that a person outside the project could verify from a named record on a stated date, targets justified by evidence or capacity, and honesty about outcomes the project cannot promise, such as changes it does not measure.

How the PUBH 6641 Week 4 example is put together

The memo explains the four parts every objective must have, then lists five objectives under separate headings. Each gives a target, a deadline, the record that will show it and a short reason for the number or the measure. The objectives move from outputs, creams screened, to reporting, follow-up, regulatory notification and finally behavior, women stopping use. Evidence from a large product study and a poisoning case supports two objectives, and the federal limit defines a positive screen. A section lists what the objectives do not promise, and the memo closes with a request for review by a date.

PUBH 6641 Week 4 rubric: what earns full marks

Objectives memos are graded on measurability, alignment with scope, justification and completeness. Each objective should name a count, a record and a date. Objectives should follow from the scope and cover both delivery and outcomes. Targets should be justified with capacity or evidence. Credit is given for stating what is not promised. Professional memo form and correct citations complete the grade. Objectives that use vague verbs such as "improve" or "raise awareness" without a measure lose most of the measurability credit. Objectives that state the data record by name, such as a screening log or follow-up log, make the evaluation easy to build. Graders also reward targets justified by capacity, such as events per season, rather than chosen for being round numbers. A short list of what the objectives do not promise prevents later criticism for missing goals the project never set.

Common PUBH 6641 Week 4 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Students often write objectives that describe activities rather than results. Ask what a stranger would need to check whether each objective was met: who, how many, which record and when. Justify each target. Include at least one outcome beyond delivery. Avoid promising changes you will not measure. Send the objectives for approval before building later sections on them. An objectives memo can be prepared from your project's scope if you share it. Read each objective aloud and ask, "How would I prove this on the date?" If you cannot name the record, rewrite it. Five objectives measured carefully beat ten measured loosely.

Get a PUBH 6641 Week 4 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 4 prompt and rubric with your scope sentence, and every objective is written to that exact population. Laboratory reports and lending records belonging to a real agency are never requested; the sample names them as records to be confirmed. Expect it in 24-48h, free for a first request.

Request this week free All PUBH 6641 weeks Finished samples

More PUBH 6641 papers and MPH samples

PUBH 6641 Week 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free PUBH 6641 Week 4 sample paper?

The Week 4 memo is laid out in full above, turning a mercury screening scope into five checkable objectives.

What makes an objective checkable?

It names who is counted, how many, the record that will show it and the date it will be judged.

Why report a confidence interval for the contamination rate?

It shows how precise the local estimate is, given the number of creams screened.

What is the project's most important outcome?

Women with contaminated creams stopping their use, measured by follow-up three months after screening.

What do the objectives not promise?

Changes in blood mercury, reductions in sales or any particular contamination rate.