NURS 6914 Week 11 reflection example

Advanced Palliative Concepts and Interdisciplinary Perspectives Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 6914 Week 11 reflection example follows a heaviness its author noticed after writing the course's sedation debate, about an invented man who begged to sleep until he died, and traces it back to years on an oncology unit where deaths passed without a pause. Walden NURS 6914 closes the MSN advanced palliative course with self-care, and the reflection uses Driscoll's What? So what? Now what? questions. It separates moral distress, as Jameton defined it, from moral uncertainty, compassion fatigue as Figley described it and ordinary grief. A ProQOL result shows average burnout, strong compassion satisfaction and more secondary traumatic stress than the other scores predict. Three practices follow: a pause after each death, monthly debriefing and repeat ProQOL checks.

CourseNURS 6914 Advanced Palliative Concepts and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
WeekWeek 11
Paper typeReflection paper
LengthAbout 1,010 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing (MSN)
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 6914 Week 11

1

The Weight I Carried Home From a Case on Paper: A Driscoll Reflection on Moral Distress, Compassion Fatigue and Grief in Palliative Nursing

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 6914: Advanced Palliative Concepts and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title admits that a written case affected the author, which signals a reflection about self-care grounded in a real reaction.
2

The Weight I Carried Home From a Case on Paper: A Driscoll Reflection on Moral Distress, Compassion Fatigue and Grief in Palliative Nursing

What?

Midway through this term, I wrote a discussion post about a composite man in his last days who begged to be sedated until he died because he could not bear the terror of waiting. The case was invented, yet I found it hard to stop thinking about him. I drafted the post late at night, rewrote the position paragraph four times and woke the next morning still turning over whether respite sedation was enough. Over the following week, I noticed a heaviness I recognized. It resembled what I carried during two years on an oncology unit, where a run of deaths happened close together and none of them was ever talked about as a team. We cleaned the room, admitted the next patient and moved on.

This reflection uses three questions from Driscoll's reflective model (Driscoll, 2007), What? So what? Now what?, to examine that heaviness: what it is, what it means for my practice as a palliative advanced practice nurse and what I will do about it.

What this page is doingThe description connects a reaction to coursework with an older pattern from practice, described only in general terms.
3

So What?

Three concepts from this term's readings could describe what I felt, and they call for different responses, so it matters which one fits.

Moral distress. Jameton (1984) used the term moral distress for the pain of being sure what ought to be done yet blocked from doing it by the setting one works in. When I think of my oncology years, part of what I felt fits this definition: I believed the deaths should have been acknowledged, and the unit's pace made that impossible. The heaviness after writing the sedation post is different. No one prevented me from acting; the difficulty was not knowing with certainty what was right. That is moral uncertainty, not moral distress.

Compassion fatigue. Figley (2002) wrote of compassion fatigue as the wearing down of a helper's empathy by steady exposure to other people's suffering, a cost that includes taking on some of their trauma as one's own. My inability to stop thinking about an imagined patient could be an early sign of this: an empathic response that did not switch off.

Grief. Some of what I felt is plainly grief, both for the invented man, whose situation I had to imagine in detail, and, belatedly, for the patients on my old unit whose deaths passed without a moment of pause. Grief is not a disorder. It is the normal cost of caring about people who die.

To see where I stand, I completed the Professional Quality of Life Scale, which measures compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress (Stamm, 2010). My compassion satisfaction score fell in the upper part of the average range, and burnout in the lower part of average. My secondary traumatic stress score was in the average range but higher than the other two would predict. I read this as a nurse who still finds meaning in the work, is not burned out, but carries more of patients' suffering home than is sustainable over a career in palliative care.

What this page is doingSeparating three look-alike concepts and testing each against the author's own experience is the analytic core of the reflection.
4

What It Means for My Practice

Palliative care will put me in the presence of death more often than oncology did. If I carry each death home the way I carried an invented one, I will not last. The readings suggest that the problem is not caring too much but caring without the practices that let grief be expressed and set down. On my old unit, the absence of any ritual after a death meant that grief had nowhere to go. I also notice that I am better at noticing moral distress in colleagues than in myself; I would have encouraged a colleague to talk about the heaviness I have been carrying quietly.

There is a professional reason to take this seriously as well as a personal one. A clinician carrying unacknowledged grief may begin, without meaning to, to protect herself by keeping patients at a distance: shorter visits, fewer questions about fears, a quicker move to the next task. I recognize that pattern from my last year on the oncology unit, when I stopped asking families how they were coping because I did not have room for the answer. The patients in palliative care deserve a nurse who has room. Making that room is part of the work, not a luxury added to it.

Finally, the distinction between moral distress and moral uncertainty matters for how I respond. Moral distress calls for changing the conditions that block right action, for example by raising concerns about workload or unit practices. Moral uncertainty calls for better deliberation: talking cases through with colleagues, consulting an ethics service and accepting that some choices will remain hard even when made well. I had been treating both as private burdens, and neither is best carried alone.

Now What?

I will keep three practices.

A pause after each death. When a patient on my caseload dies, I will take a moment, alone or with colleagues, to say the person's name and one thing I remember. Many palliative teams use a brief pause of this kind, and I intend to propose it to my future team if it is not already practiced.

Regular debriefing. I will seek a clinical supervision or peer debriefing group and attend monthly, using the time to talk about cases that stay with me.

Measuring myself. I will repeat the Professional Quality of Life Scale every six months during my first two years as an APRN, and treat a rising secondary traumatic stress score as a signal to seek support rather than a verdict.

These practices will not prevent me from feeling the weight of the work, and I do not want them to. What I want is a way to carry it that lets me come back the next day able to offer the same attention. The man in my sedation post needed a clinician who could stay present with his terror. So will the real patients who come after him.

What this page is doingThe action plan is modest and checkable, and the closing ties self-care back to what patients need from the nurse.
5

References

Driscoll, J. (2007). Practising clinical supervision: A reflective approach for healthcare professionals (2nd ed.). Baillière Tindall Elsevier.

Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists' chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(11), 1433-1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10090

Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Prentice-Hall.

Stamm, B. H. (2010). The concise ProQOL manual (2nd ed.). ProQOL.org.

Reading the NURS 6914 Week 11 instructions

The final reflection in this advanced course typically asks you to examine how palliative work affects you and how you will sustain yourself as an advanced practice nurse. Plan on roughly three or four pages written in your own voice. Start from a specific moment, even one from coursework, and describe it plainly. Use a reflective model so the paper travels from the event to its meaning and then to action. Distinguish related concepts, such as moral distress, compassion fatigue and grief, because each calls for a different response. Consider using a validated measure of your own professional quality of life. End with a small number of practices you can keep and check, and connect them to what patients need from you.

Inside the NURS 6914 Week 11 example

The What? section describes writing the sedation post and the older pattern from oncology, and introduces Driscoll's model. The So what? section tests three concepts against the author's experience: Jameton's moral distress, Figley's compassion fatigue and grief, and reports ProQOL results citing Stamm. A section on practice explains why unacknowledged grief can make a nurse keep patients at a distance and why moral distress and moral uncertainty call for different responses. The Now what? section commits to a pause after each death, monthly debriefing and repeat ProQOL checks every six months, and closes by returning to the man in the sedation post. No real patient or colleague is identifiable.

Reading the NURS 6914 Week 11 rubric

Self-care reflections are generally weighed on honesty, conceptual accuracy, use of a reflective model and a sustainable plan. Graders credit candor most when a reaction is named with the detail that makes it believable. Conceptual accuracy matters, because moral distress, compassion fatigue and burnout are often confused and rubrics check the distinctions. Model use is judged on whether each question builds on the last. A validated measure, interpreted with care, strengthens the analysis. Plans score best when practices are specific and checkable. Linking self-care to patient care often earns a share. First-person voice is expected, with scholarly sources cited in APA. Tying each practice to a patient need shows the plan is about care, not only about the writer.

Common NURS 6914 Week 11 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Self-care reflections lose marks when they list generic habits, such as exercise and sleep, without connecting them to the work. Another common loss is labeling every difficult feeling as burnout. Some papers describe feelings at length and never reach a plan. Others promise to never carry work home, which no palliative nurse can keep. Describe one moment, work through the model, test your experience against precise concepts, measure where you stand, choose a few practices you can keep and link them to the patients you will serve. The desk can help shape a reflection from your own experience. Describe past workplaces and colleagues only in general terms.

Get a NURS 6914 Week 11 example written to your instructions

Set out the focus of your Week 11 prompt, the model required and the rubric; also mention any measure your course relies on. The reflection you get back describes the experience safely, lets the analysis carry most of the weight and ends on concrete practices, in 24-48 hours, with no fee the first time.

More NURS 6914 papers and MSN samples

NURS 6914 Week 11 questions, answered

What is moral distress?

As Andrew Jameton described it, the distress that arises when a clinician knows the ethically right action but is constrained from taking it, by policy, hierarchy or circumstance. The example separates it from compassion fatigue and grief because the remedies differ: moral distress points toward changing constraints and speaking up, not only toward rest. Your reflection is stronger for naming which one you are describing.

What is the ProQOL?

The Professional Quality of Life scale, associated with Beth Hudnall Stamm, which measures compassion satisfaction alongside burnout and secondary traumatic stress in people who work with suffering. The example reports the author's own result as evidence within the analysis and interprets it cautiously. Few prompts require a measure; where one is used, it gives the reflection something firmer than impression to reason from.

Is the reflection about burnout?

Only partly. Burnout, the example contends, is too broad a word for what the author experienced, and separates moral distress, compassion fatigue and grief, each with a different response. Choosing the precise term is the analytical move graduate rubrics favor, and it keeps the closing practices matched to the actual problem rather than to a label.

Where can I find a free NURS 6914 Week 11 sample paper?

The full reflection, Driscoll's three questions, the concept comparison, the ProQOL results and three practices, are offered here without a fee. Help with your own reflection can be requested.

How does the NURS 6914 Week 11 reflection tell moral distress from moral uncertainty?

Moral distress means knowing what is right and being blocked from doing it; the sedation case caused uncertainty about what was right, which calls for deliberation with colleagues rather than changing conditions.