NURS 6912 Week 11 reflection example

Symptom Management for the Hospice and Palliative Care Clinician Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 6912 Week 11 reflection example admits which symptom its author handled worst: fatigue, mentioned in nearly every plan of the term and managed in none. Walden NURS 6912 closes the MSN symptom course with structured reflection, and the paper follows Johns' model. It quotes the single line each earlier plan gave to fatigue, asks why it always fell to the end and names three influences plus a personal one: a belief that nothing could be done, a habit of treating what is quickly measured, case prompts that pointed elsewhere and the author's own tiredness. Alternatives come with evidence, the Brief Fatigue Inventory and Mustian's meta-analysis, and the action plan puts a fatigue section in every future plan.

CourseNURS 6912 Symptom Management for the Hospice and Palliative Care Clinician
WeekWeek 11
Paper typeReflection paper
LengthAbout 1,040 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing (MSN)
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 6912 Week 11

1

Mentioned Often, Managed Never: A Structured Reflection on Why I Left Fatigue to the End of Every Symptom Plan

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 6912: Symptom Management for the Hospice and Palliative Care Clinician

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the pattern the reflection found, which makes clear from the start that it examines a habit rather than celebrating progress.
2

Mentioned Often, Managed Never: A Structured Reflection on Why I Left Fatigue to the End of Every Symptom Plan

Description

Of all the symptoms this course covered, fatigue is the one I have handled worst, and I did not notice until I reread my own work. I had thought of myself as thorough, a nurse who asks about everything, and the discovery that one symptom had slipped through every plan I wrote was not what I expected to find when I began this assignment. I went back through the plans I wrote this term and searched each for the word. In my pain assessment for the man with spinal metastases, fatigue appeared once, in a list: "also reports fatigue." In my gastrointestinal plan, it appeared in the assessment and nowhere in the management. In my delirium case, I wrote that the patient's daytime drowsiness was "likely due to disease progression" and moved on. Across the term, fatigue appeared in nearly every case and received a management plan in none. This reflection follows the model of structured reflection (Johns, 1995), which guides the writer through a sequence of cue questions about the experience, the influences on it and the alternatives, to ask why.

What this page is doingQuoting the single line each plan gave to fatigue turns a vague admission into evidence the reader can check.
3

Reflection: What Was I Trying to Achieve?

In each plan, I was trying to solve the problem that seemed most urgent and most solvable. Pain had clear measures, drug classes and a place in every guideline. Constipation had a causal chain I could draw. Delirium had a checklist of reversible causes. Fatigue seemed different: always present, rarely urgent and without an obvious fix. I think I placed it last because I did not believe I could do anything about it, and a plan section with nothing in it felt like a failure. Leaving it out felt safer than writing "fatigue: supportive care" and admitting I had nothing to offer.

Influencing Factors

Three influences stand out. The first is a belief that fatigue is simply the price of serious illness, something patients must accept. I absorbed that belief early in my nursing career, when fatigue in patients receiving chemotherapy was described to me as expected and temporary. The second is a habit of treating what can be measured quickly. I had a number for pain at every visit, but I had never used a fatigue measure, so fatigue was always described in words, and words are easy to skip. The third is the case prompts themselves. Most of this term's scenarios named another symptom as the focus, and fatigue appeared as background. I followed the prompts' emphasis without questioning it.

There was also something personal. When patients describe exhaustion, I recognize my own tiredness after long shifts, and I think I minimized theirs partly because I minimize mine. That is uncomfortable to write, but it may explain why the belief that nothing can be done felt so natural.

What this page is doingNaming the personal influence alongside the professional ones is what separates structured reflection from a list of reasons.
4

Alternatives: What Could I Have Done?

The readings showed me that there was more to do than I believed. First, fatigue can be measured. The Brief Fatigue Inventory asks patients to rate fatigue now, at its usual level and at its worst, and how much it interferes with activity, mood, walking, work, relationships and enjoyment of life, and it was developed to be quick enough for routine use (Mendoza et al., 1999). Using it would have given fatigue a number on every visit, just as pain had.

Second, fatigue has contributors that can be looked for and sometimes treated: anemia, depression, poor sleep, pain, medication effects, low thyroid function, dehydration and deconditioning. My delirium patient's drowsiness, for instance, might have prompted a review of her opioid and her calcium before I attributed it to progression.

Third, fatigue can be treated. Pooling trials of drugs, talking therapies and physical activity for cancer-related fatigue, Mustian et al. (2017) found the two nondrug approaches came out ahead, both while people were in treatment and afterward, and the medicines tested did comparatively little. The findings come mainly from people receiving or recovering from cancer treatment, so they apply only partly to patients near the end of life, but they undermine my belief that nothing can be done. Energy conservation, pacing, brief activity matched to ability and better sleep are all within a nurse's reach.

Learning

I have learned that the symptoms I treat well are the ones I measure, and that my belief that a symptom is untreatable can become a reason not to look. If I had applied to fatigue the same approach I applied to pain, measure it, look for causes, treat what can be treated and reassess, my plans would have had something to offer patients for whom fatigue was, as several of them said in the case prompts, the worst part of their day.

I also learned that the case prompts shaped my attention more than I realized. A prompt that names pain as the focus does not mean fatigue is unimportant; it means the prompt's author chose a focus. In practice, no one will write a prompt for me, and the patient's ranking of symptoms should set my focus, as it did in my kidney disease plan, the one place this term where I treated tiredness as a symptom in its own right. That plan was also the one where I asked the patient to rank his symptoms first, which suggests the fix is partly procedural: when patients set the order, the symptoms I overlook have a way back in.

Action Plan

I will make three changes. For the next three months, I will include a fatigue rating in every symptom assessment I complete, using the Brief Fatigue Inventory's usual-fatigue item as a minimum. When a patient rates fatigue at 4 or higher, I will review the common contributors before concluding that it reflects the disease alone. And every symptom plan I write will include a fatigue section, even if it contains only pacing, sleep and a reassessment date, so that fatigue is never again left out because I thought there was nothing to say. I will review my own plans at the end of each month and count how many carried a fatigue section, so I can see whether the habit is changing rather than assuming it has.

What this page is doingThe action plan is specific and self-checking, and it closes the loop by promising to count the plans that include fatigue.
5

References

Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x

Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Cleeland, C. S., Morrissey, M., Johnson, B. A., Wendt, J. K., & Huber, S. L. (1999). The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer, 85(5), 1186-1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1186::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-N

Mustian, K. M., Alfano, C. M., Heckler, C., Kleckner, A. S., Kleckner, I. R., Leach, C. R., Mohr, D., Palesh, O. G., Peppone, L. J., Piper, B. F., Scarpato, J., Smith, T., Sprod, L. K., & Miller, S. M. (2017). Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: A meta-analysis. JAMA Oncology, 3(7), 961-968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6914

NURS 6912 Week 11 instructions, in plain terms

To finish the symptom course, the last assignment has you examine your own practice or learning in symptom management with a structured reflective model, and to plan for improvement. Three to four first-person pages is a typical length, with a few sources. Choose one specific gap rather than general growth. Use evidence from your own coursework, quoted where possible, to show the gap is real. Work through the model's questions honestly, including influences that are personal. Consider alternatives with evidence rather than good intentions. State what you have learned in a sentence or two. End with an action plan you can check yourself, with a time frame and a way of counting whether the habit is changing.

Inside the NURS 6912 Week 11 example

The description quotes three lines from earlier plans and cites Johns for the model. A section on what the author was trying to achieve explains why fatigue felt unsolvable. An influences section names three professional factors and one personal one. The alternatives section cites Mendoza and colleagues on the Brief Fatigue Inventory, lists contributors that could have been checked and cites Mustian and colleagues' meta-analysis, noting its limits near the end of life. A learning section connects measurement with attention and notes the one plan where the patient's ranking brought tiredness in. The action plan sets three changes and a monthly count. The paper gives the analysis stages the most space.

NURS 6912 Week 11 rubric: what earns full marks

Structured reflections are typically assessed on honesty, depth, use of the model, evidence and a realistic plan. Honesty earns credit when the writer names a real gap with examples from their own work. Graders look for the reasons behind the gap, uncomfortable ones included. Model use requires working through its cues rather than naming them. Evidence should support the alternatives the writer considers. The action plan scores best when it is specific, time-bound and self-checking. Scholarly writing standards still apply to first-person reflection, including APA citations. Protecting patient confidentiality is assumed, and composite examples meet it. A plan that counts its own results each month is easier to credit than a promise.

Common NURS 6912 Week 11 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Reflections lose marks when they choose a comfortable topic, such as growth in confidence, that shows nothing the writer did not already know. Another common loss is describing a gap without explaining where it came from. Some papers list the model's cue questions as headings and write two sentences under each. Others end with a promise to do better that no one could check. Choose a real gap, prove it from your own work, examine professional and personal influences, test alternatives against evidence and commit to a change you can count. The desk can help you shape a reflection from your own coursework. Keep patients composite or unidentifiable.

Get a NURS 6912 Week 11 example written to your instructions

Point to the symptom, skill or moment your Week 11 prompt asks about, name the reflective model required, and supply the rubric. The reflection that comes back is grounded in the term's own work and written in first person, inside 24-48 hours, with no cost attached to a first sample. Assigned readings you mention are put to use in the analysis.

More NURS 6912 papers and MSN samples

NURS 6912 Week 11 questions, answered

What is Johns' model of structured reflection?

A nursing reflection framework developed by Christopher Johns that uses cue questions to move from describing an experience to examining influencing factors, alternatives and learning. The example uses the cues as headings, with influencing factors and alternatives taking the largest share. If your course names Gibbs or Driscoll instead, the same evidence and argument fit those stages.

Why choose fatigue as the least confident symptom?

Because the evidence was in the author's own work: across the term's plans, fatigue received a line and no management. Choosing a symptom with that kind of trail lets the reflection quote itself rather than rely on impressions. Your own choice might be dyspnea, delirium or nausea; what matters is that the weakness can be shown, not merely claimed.

Is the Brief Fatigue Inventory required?

Not by most prompts, but naming a validated measure shows the reflection has moved from admission to action. The Brief Fatigue Inventory rates fatigue severity and its interference with daily life, which gives future plans a baseline to reassess against. Another validated fatigue tool from your course readings works equally well without changing the argument.

Where can I find a free NURS 6912 Week 11 sample paper?

The complete reflection on fatigue, every Johns stage and the action plan, can be read in full on this page, free. Help with a reflection built from your own coursework can be requested.

What changes does the NURS 6912 Week 11 reflection commit to?

A fatigue rating in every assessment, a review of common contributors when fatigue scores 4 or higher, a fatigue section in every symptom plan and a monthly count of plans that include one.