| Course | NURS 6910 Introduction to Palliative Care: Principles of Hospice and Palliative Care |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 11 |
| Paper type | Reflection paper |
| Length | About 1,030 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 6910 Week 11
Reassurance Before She Finished: A Gibbs Reflection on Listening in Serious Illness Conversations
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 6910: Introduction to Palliative Care: Principles of Hospice and Palliative Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Reassurance Before She Finished: A Gibbs Reflection on Listening in Serious Illness Conversations
Description
Early in this course I wrote a scripted conversation in which a nurse tells a composite patient that her cancer has grown despite treatment. Before revising it for submission, I read my first draft aloud and marked every place the patient spoke. I found three places where my nurse offered reassurance before the patient had finished her sentence. In the clearest one, the patient began, "I'm scared that when it gets bad, nobody will be there to..." and my nurse cut in with, "Don't worry, we'll make sure you're comfortable." I had written both lines myself, with no time pressure and no real patient in front of me, and I still did not let her finish. This reflection moves through the six stages of the reflective cycle (Gibbs, 1988), from what happened and how I felt through to what I will do differently, to ask why.
Feelings
Reading the draft, I felt embarrassed first, because I had just read about this exact mistake. Under the embarrassment was something more useful to notice: when I imagined the patient's fear, I felt an urgent need to make it stop. I could picture a real patient saying those words on a real unit, and my instinct was to reach for her hand and fix it. Silence after a frightened sentence feels, to me, like standing by while someone suffers. Writing the reassurance felt like doing something. I also recognized a wish to be seen as helpful, to have the right answer ready, that has followed me through years of acute care nursing.
Evaluation
Something good was in the line. It was kind, and it named comfort, which was a real goal for this patient. But weighing what it achieved against what it closed off, the cost was higher. The patient was about to name a specific fear, that no one would be there, and my reassurance answered a different fear, pain, that she had not raised. She would have been left with her real worry unspoken and a promise that did not address it. The other two places in the draft followed the same pattern: my nurse soothed a feeling before learning what it was about.
Analysis
The readings this term gave me language for what I did. Maguire and Pitceathly (2002) describe blocking behaviors, the ways clinicians discourage patients from disclosing their concerns, and premature reassurance is one of the most common. They explain that reassurance offered before the concern is fully explored is usually ineffective, because it is aimed at a guess. That describes my draft exactly.
Back et al. (2005) describe an ask-tell-ask approach to difficult conversations: ask what the patient understands or is worried about, tell in small pieces, then ask again what she has taken in. They also describe responding to emotion with statements such as naming or exploring before offering information or solutions. My reassurance skipped the asking entirely. It also skipped the second ask, the check on what she had taken in, because the conversation moved straight to the next topic after my nurse's promise, as if the matter were settled. If my nurse had said, "Nobody will be there to...?" and waited, the patient would have finished her sentence, and the answer would have been about her fear rather than mine.
The deeper cause is older than this course. In acute care, my job was often to fix things quickly: bring pain down, calm an anxious patient before a procedure, solve the problem in front of me. That habit served patients well in those settings. In serious illness conversations, it works against me, because many concerns cannot be fixed, and the patient needs first to be heard. My urge to reassure is a fixing reflex applied to a situation where fixing is not what is needed.
I also noticed that the reflex appeared when the emotion was strongest. At the calmer points in the draft, my nurse asked good questions. It was the frightened sentences that triggered the interruption, which suggests the reflex is about managing my own discomfort as much as the patient's.
Seeing this changed how I read the course's communication frameworks. I had treated SPIKES and the NURSE statements as scripts to follow in order. Reading my own draft, I understood them as tools for slowing down at exactly the moments when I most want to speed up. The frameworks are not difficult to learn; what is difficult is using them when my own anxiety is highest, and that is a skill that only practice with feedback will build.
Conclusion
Three things changed in my revised script and, I hope, in my practice. First, questions now come before information: my nurse asks what the patient understands and what worries her before offering anything. Second, silence is held after hard news, written into the script as a stage direction so that I cannot skip it. Third, emotion is named before facts or plans are offered. In the revised version, when the patient says she is scared, my nurse responds, "That sounds frightening. Tell me more about what scares you," and the patient's real fear, being alone, is the one that gets answered.
Action Plan
Written scripts are easier than real conversations, so I need a way to practice where the stakes are real but manageable. For the next three months, in my current role, I will choose one conversation a week with a patient or family facing a difficult situation, and afterward write down whether I let the person finish the sentence where their emotion was strongest. I will ask a colleague I trust to observe one family meeting a month and tell me whether I interrupted. I will also practice one sentence, "Tell me more," until it comes to me before reassurance does.
I expect the reflex to persist, because it was built over years. The goal is not to stop wanting to help, a wish that brought me into nursing in the first place, but to help in the right order: listen until the concern is clear, and then respond to that concern rather than the one I imagined.
References
Back, A. L., Arnold, R. M., Baile, W. F., Tulsky, J. A., & Fryer-Edwards, K. (2005). Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55(3), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.
Maguire, P., & Pitceathly, C. (2002). Key communication skills and how to acquire them. BMJ, 325(7366), 697-700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.697
Reading the NURS 6910 Week 11 instructions
The final reflection in this course usually asks you to examine your development in palliative care communication or practice using a reflective model, and to plan continued growth. Three to four pages in first person is typical, with a few citations. Choose one specific moment, ideally from your own coursework or practice, and describe it exactly. Use a model such as Gibbs to move from description through feelings and evaluation to analysis, and give analysis the most room. Connect the pattern to course readings and to your earlier experience. State what has changed in concrete terms. End with an action plan that someone else could observe, and admit what will be hard to change.
How this NURS 6910 Week 11 example is built
The description quotes the interrupted sentence and the reassuring reply and cites Gibbs for the cycle. The feelings section names embarrassment and the urge to stop another person's fear. The evaluation weighs the kindness of the line against the fear it left unspoken. The analysis cites Maguire and Pitceathly on blocking and premature reassurance and Back and colleagues on ask-tell-ask and responding to emotion, then traces the habit to acute care and notices that it appears when emotion is strongest. A paragraph reconsiders the course frameworks as tools for slowing down. The conclusion lists three changes, and the action plan sets weekly self-review and monthly observation.
NURS 6910 Week 11 rubric: what earns full marks
Reflections are generally evaluated on depth of analysis, honesty, use of a reflective model, connection to evidence and a realistic plan. The analysis stage is where most points sit, since it should explain causes rather than repeat events. Honesty is rewarded when the writer names a real weakness with a specific example. Model use earns credit when every stage is present and the stages build on one another. Evidence credit comes from readings applied to the writer's own behavior. The action plan scores well when it is concrete, time-bound and observable by someone else. First-person voice is expected, with APA used for any sources cited. Confidentiality must be protected throughout.
Common NURS 6910 Week 11 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Reflections lose credit when they describe a moment and jump straight to what was learned, skipping feelings and analysis. Another common loss is choosing a weakness so general, such as needing better communication, that no one could see it change. Some papers cite a model and use only its first and last stages. Others promise large changes with no way to check them. Pick one moment, quote it, work through every stage, give the most space to why it happened, tie it to readings and commit to a small observable practice. The desk can help shape a reflection from material you share, though the experience must be yours. Change or omit any detail that would let a reader recognize a real patient.
Get a NURS 6910 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Say what your Week 11 reflection prompt asks about and whether a named reflective model is required, and send the rubric. A first-person reflection is drafted around one specific moment, examined in depth, and returned within 24-48 hours, free as a first sample. Any course readings you list are drawn into the analysis.
More NURS 6910 papers and MSN samples
- NURS 6910 Week 1: Discussion post
- NURS 6910 Week 2: Concept comparison paper
- NURS 6910 Week 3: Models of care analysis
- NURS 6910 Week 4: Eligibility and referral memo
- NURS 6910 Week 5: Goals of care plan
- NURS 6910 Week 6: Communication case
- NURS 6910 Week 7: Family assessment
- NURS 6910 Week 8: Discussion post
- NURS 6910 Week 9: Spiritual and cultural assessment
- NURS 6910 Week 10: Palliative Case Analysis
- NURS 6730 Week 11: Reflection
- NURS 6720 Week 11: Reflection
- DNRS 6501 Week 11: Synthesis paper
- NURS 6710 Week 11: Reflection
NURS 6910 Week 11 questions, answered
Does the reflection mention real patients?
No. The quoted line comes from the author's own scripted conversation with a composite patient, and the earlier nursing work it recalls is described only in general, with no person, date or place attached. Your own reflection can draw on experience in the same way, keeping what you learned and leaving out anything that could identify someone.
What is Gibbs' reflective cycle?
A six-stage model: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and action plan. It is widely taught in nursing because it prevents a reflection from jumping from event to resolution. The example gives most of its length to evaluation and analysis, the stages weaker papers compress. Where a different model is required, Johns or Driscoll for instance, the same material moves under its stages.
Why focus on a weakness instead of growth?
Because a weakness gives the analysis something to explain, and the growth only becomes visible against it. The paper does end on change, questions before information and silence after hard news, but it earns that ending by examining the reflex first. Reflections that list what went well tend to stay descriptive, which your rubric's analysis criterion is likely to notice.
Where can I find a free NURS 6910 Week 11 sample paper?
The complete reflection, all six Gibbs stages with the author's own quoted line and the action plan, can be read here at no cost. Help shaping a reflection from your own work can be requested.
What practice does the NURS 6910 Week 11 reflection commit to?
One conversation a week reviewed afterward for whether the person finished the sentence where emotion was strongest, plus a colleague observing one family meeting a month.