NURS 6910 Week 5 asks for a goals of care plan, and this example builds one on VitalTalk's REMAP sequence, ordering questions for a man with ALS before any treatment appears. Searches like "nurs 6910 week 5 assignment example", "nurs6910 week 5 sample" and "nurs 6910 week 5 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 6910 Week 5 goals of care plan looks like
Page one is a question map. Each question is written out as it would be asked, with a line explaining why it sits where it does: what he understands about ALS, how much detail he wants, what he is hoping for, what worries him most, what abilities matter enough to shape choices, and who should decide if he cannot speak for himself. Page two records his answers, quoting him where the scenario supplies words: staying in his workshop, talking with his grandson, and not living attached to a machine without a way out. The REMAP stages then organize the alignment section, where his values are matched to the decisions ahead on breathing support and nutrition. Documentation closes the plan: a named health care proxy, an advance directive, and the disease milestones that reopen the conversation.
How a NURS 6910 Week 5 example is structured
Order is the argument of this plan, so the question map comes before anything else and each placement is justified. Understanding precedes information because a plan that tells a man about his disease before learning what he already believes cannot tell whether anything landed. Hopes are asked before worries, and worries before trade-offs, since trade-offs only make sense once the listener knows what is being protected. Surrogate designation is last among the questions, asked once values are on the record, so the proxy is chosen for knowing them. The alignment section borrows REMAP's stages as headings, which makes the move from values to a recommendation visible rather than implied. Documentation sits at the end with triggers for revisiting, because ALS changes the question on a schedule set by the illness rather than by the clinic.
The question map
Six questions in a fixed order, each with a line of rationale for its position. The map is the plan's first page.
His words, kept as his
The workshop, the grandson and the fear of a machine with no exit are quoted, so his values are not paraphrased away.
Reframe and expect emotion
The plan notes where the reframe about progression lands and where grief is expected, leaving room in the sequence for silence.
Mapping values to decisions
Breathing support and nutrition are the two decisions ahead; the plan shows which of his stated values bear on each.
Proxy, directive, milestones
A named health care proxy, an advance directive and the functional changes that reopen the conversation close the document.
Where marks go in NURS 6910 Week 5
Assessment ahead of recommendation is the ordering this assignment exists to test, and a plan that opens with ventilation choices has put the conclusion where the inquiry should be. This example earns the sequencing credit by writing the questions out and defending their order. His voice is the next thing looked for: goals attributed to a patient without a quoted word are really the clinician's guesses. A recommendation matters too, because graders in serious-illness communication often penalize a list of choices handed to a man already carrying a heavy diagnosis. A plan with no surrogate loses points, as does documentation that never reaches an advance directive, and so do goals treated as settled when ALS guarantees they will be revisited. He, like his grandson, belongs to no real family.
Get a NURS 6910 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Upload the Week 5 instructions and rubric and say which diagnosis the case names; ALS, advanced cancer and organ failure each reorder the questions differently. A plan comes back with its question map, the patient's quoted answers and a documented proxy, delivered in 24-48 hours, and your first one is free.
NURS 6910 Week 5 questions, answered
What does REMAP stand for?
Reframe, expect emotion, map what matters, align with those values, and plan care that matches them. It is a VitalTalk roadmap for goals of care conversations, and the example uses its stages as the headings of the alignment section. A course teaching a different conversation model gets the same logic of values before choices, set under that model's headings.
Why is the proxy question asked last?
Because a surrogate is most useful when chosen by someone who has just said what matters to him. Asking for a name first produces a relative; asking after values produces a person the patient trusts to carry those values. Some prompts require the proxy earlier for legal reasons, and the example marks where that order can shift without losing the reasoning.
Does the plan recommend a feeding tube or ventilation?
No. It records the decisions ahead, links each to the values he named, and documents the recommendation the composite clinician made in the scenario. It is an academic artifact, not guidance for any real patient with ALS. Clinical choices about breathing support and nutrition belong to the people treating a person, and the plan says so plainly.