NURS 6370 · Nursing (MSN)

NURS 6370 Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Estella Vandergriff, MSN, RN Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments Walden University Free custom samples in 24–48h

Same educator, two audiences. NURS 6370 papers show the skill floor of the job and then split it, because a syllabus for a university section and an in-service for a night shift are not the same document.

How this shelf works

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. NURS 6370 is Walden’s Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments course. It centers on the working skills a new educator needs, written twice over, once for an academic classroom and once for staff development inside a health system. Some program versions carry this course as DNUR 6370; the same drawers apply. Searches like "nurs 6370 week 4 assignment example", "NURS6370 sample paper", and "NURS 6370 week samples" land on this page.

What NURS 6370 is really about

The title of NURS 6370 names two workplaces, and the course is largely about what changes between them. In a university section the educator inherits a syllabus, a progression policy, an integrity standard and a grade that decides whether someone continues in the program. In a staff development office the same educator answers to a manager, teaches licensed adults who resent being there, has forty minutes between shifts, and has to show the education changed something a unit was worried about. Writing that ignores the difference reads as generic to both graders. The assignments reward a writer who can say which setting a given practice belongs to and what it would cost to move it.

Underneath the split sits a floor of skills that both settings assume and neither teaches: writing an objective someone can act on, planning a session that fits the time it actually has, giving feedback that a learner can use without arguing, documenting what was taught, and standing in front of a group without reading slides aloud. These look small on a page and carry real marks, because the rubric asks for them as artifacts rather than as claims. If your section carries a field experience in a classroom or a staff development office, the hours you put in, the site paperwork and the evaluation your host completes stay entirely with you; we work on the writing around them.

What NURS 6370’s assessments ask for

Weeks here typically produce a document rather than an essay, with a discussion thread running alongside. Threads often ask you to take a practice from one setting and argue whether it survives in the other, and replies get read for whether you tested the transfer or admired it. Assignments commonly want the artifacts themselves: a syllabus section with policies a student could rely on, a session plan timed to the minutes available, an in-service outline built from a unit problem, a feedback response written on a piece of student work, and an evaluation approach proportionate to what was taught. Where a course asks for a presentation, the classroom usually grades the handout and the plan as much as the delivery.

Where students lose points in NURS 6370

The first loss is the document that could be handed to either audience, which usually means it fits neither: a session plan with no time attached, policies with no consequence, an in-service that assumes a lecture hall. Feedback assignments cost marks when the response praises and corrects grammar but never tells the learner what to do differently on the next attempt. Marks also drain when the writer treats licensed staff as students, so the plan opens with anatomy that a nurse of eleven years already carries. Other repeat offenders are objectives copied from a policy rather than written for the session, plans that run twice their allotted time, no accommodation for a learner who cannot attend live, and an evaluation that asks only whether people enjoyed it.

NURS 6370 grading scale at Walden: how the work is graded, from Walden Assignments
How Walden grades NURS 6370, visualized by Walden Assignments.

The NURS 6370 drawers

Week 1

NURS 6370 Week 1 discussion post example

Opening threads usually compare what an academic classroom and a hospital unit expect. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 2

NURS 6370 Week 2 setting comparison example

An early assignment often places the two environments side by side in writing. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 3

NURS 6370 Week 3 syllabus section example

Policies a student could rely on are frequently drafted around this week. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 4

NURS 6370 Week 4 session plan example

A single teaching session, timed to the minutes available, commonly appears next. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 5

NURS 6370 Week 5 in-service plan example

Many sections build staff education from an incident or an audit finding instead. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 6

NURS 6370 Week 6 feedback sample example

Writing usable feedback on a piece of learner work is often assigned mid-term. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 7

NURS 6370 Week 7 competency checklist example

Some classrooms produce a bedside checklist another educator could sign off from. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 8

NURS 6370 Week 8 teaching presentation example

A short taught piece with handout and plan attached typically arrives late. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 9

NURS 6370 Week 9 discussion post example

Threads near the end regularly ask which teaching practices refuse to transfer between settings. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 10

NURS 6370 Week 10 education documentation example

Later work often records what was taught in a form an auditor accepts. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 11

NURS 6370 Week 11 skills self-assessment example

Closing submissions commonly rate the working skills you now have and those missing. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Walden University revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a NURS 6370 sample the right way

Pick the sample that matches your setting, then read the other one beside it. The pair shows what actually changes: who the reader is, what can be assumed, how long anything is allowed to take, and what proof of learning the setting will accept. Inside a single document, check the specifics, since these artifacts are graded on whether they could be used on Monday rather than on how they read. Then rewrite with your own constraints, your minutes, your room, your policy, your unit's problem, because those constraints are the whole design and no example can guess them.

How these samples are written

The discipline behind every paper here: the rubric is the outline, each row gets its section, discussions get the thread treatment with substantive replies, and the format layer ships exact. Send your classroom's rubric with a request and the sample matches it, revisions included.

NURS 6370 questions, answered

Can I write everything for a hospital setting if that is where I work?

Only where the assignment prompt allows it. Many sections deliberately require one artifact from each environment, because the contrast is the point of the course. If you have a choice, write the familiar setting first and use it to expose what you would have to change elsewhere. That comparison usually satisfies more criteria than two documents from the same building.

What makes a good in-service plan at this level?

A named problem, a time limit honored, and a way of telling whether anything changed. Staff education earns its slot by fixing something a unit noticed, so the plan opens with the incident, the audit finding or the new device rather than with a topic. Keep the content to what forty minutes can hold, and attach a check that a charge nurse could run a week later.

How much detail belongs in a syllabus assignment?

Enough that a student could resolve a dispute with it. Grading weights, late work, attendance, integrity, accommodations and how feedback arrives are the sections graders check, because they are the ones students rely on. Course description and objectives usually come from the program rather than from you, so the marks sit in the policies you wrote and in whether they are consistent with each other.