| Course | NURS 6370 Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 3 |
| Paper type | Syllabus section (course policies) |
| Length | About 580 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 6370 Week 3
Syllabus Section: Late Work, Attendance and Academic Integrity Policies for a Sophomore Health Assessment Laboratory
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 6370: Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Syllabus Section: Late Work, Attendance and Academic Integrity Policies for a Sophomore Health Assessment Laboratory
Late Work
Written laboratory assignments are due at 2359 on the date posted in the course calendar. Work submitted up to 48 hours late loses 10% of the points available. Work submitted more than 48 hours late is not accepted and earns zero. One exception applies: a student with a documented illness, a family emergency or a required military duty may request an extension from the course coordinator by email before the due date, or within 48 hours after it when the emergency prevented earlier contact. The course coordinator decides every extension request within two business days and records the new due date in writing. Skills check-offs are not written assignments and are covered under Attendance.
Attendance
Laboratory sessions and lecture sessions are different obligations and are treated differently. Laboratory: attendance is required at all 14 sessions, because each session includes practice on a skill that is later checked. Present means arriving before the session's start time, in uniform, with a stethoscope and penlight. A student who arrives more than 15 minutes late is marked absent for that session. One laboratory absence may be made up in an open lab within seven days, arranged with the lab coordinator. A second absence requires a meeting with the course coordinator and a written plan, and a third absence results in failure of the laboratory component. Lecture: attendance is expected but not graded. Recordings are posted within 24 hours, and students remain responsible for all lecture content on examinations.
Academic Integrity
This course follows the university's Code of Academic Integrity, which defines violations and the process for reporting them. Two applications specific to this course are listed here because a student could not know them from the code alone. First, the skills check-off stations use scenarios that are repeated across laboratory groups during the same week; describing a station's scenario, patient findings or examiner questions to a student who has not yet been checked is a violation of the code, whether the description is given in person, by message or on social media. Second, the physical assessment write-ups in Weeks 6 and 11 must describe findings you personally obtained from your assigned partner in the laboratory; findings copied from a textbook case, from another student or from an artificial intelligence tool are fabricated data under the code. Suspected violations are reported by the faculty member to the course coordinator within five business days.
Why These Policies Read This Way
This note explains the drafting choices to my faculty reviewer and is not part of the student syllabus. Each policy states what happens and who decides, because a syllabus works best as a clear, consistent statement of expectations that students can plan around (Slattery & Carlson, 2005). The late work policy has one exception with a named decision maker rather than a promise of flexibility, since flexibility applied case by case is where students experience unfairness. Laboratory and lecture attendance are separated because missing a laboratory removes practice time that cannot be replaced by a recording, which is the reason faculty guidance gives for treating clinical and laboratory time as its own obligation (Billings & Halstead, 2020). The integrity section points to the university code rather than restating it, then adds only what the code could not anticipate, in keeping with the view that integrity rests on shared values that a course applies to its own work (International Center for Academic Integrity [ICAI], 2021).
References
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2020). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (6th ed.). Elsevier.
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.).
Slattery, J. M., & Carlson, J. F. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practices. College Teaching, 53(4), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164
Reading the NURS 6370 Week 3 instructions
Week 3 usually asks you to develop a section of a course syllabus for a nursing course you might teach, including specific policies such as late assignments, attendance and academic integrity, and to explain how the policies support learning and fairness. Some prompts add technology use, communication or accommodation statements. Many sections want the policies written as they would appear to students, followed by a brief rationale with scholarly support. Length varies, often two to three pages. Check whether your prompt names a specific course level or setting; a clinical course and a didactic course need different attendance rules, and the rubric may look for that distinction. Before writing, find out which grading scale and attendance rules the parent program already sets, because a course policy cannot promise less than the program requires.
How the NURS 6370 Week 3 example is put together
The document is written as the student would read it, with three headed policies and no preamble. Late work gives the deadline, a 10% deduction for up to 48 hours, a cut-off, one exception with a named decision maker and a two-day response time. Attendance defines present for a laboratory session and treats lecture recordings separately. Academic integrity refers to the university code and then adds two applications a student could not guess: sharing check-off scenarios and fabricating assessment findings, including with an artificial intelligence tool. A final note addressed to the faculty reviewer explains each drafting choice with three sources, keeping the reasoning out of the rules themselves.
Reading the NURS 6370 Week 3 rubric
Syllabus rubrics typically score completeness of the required policies, clarity, consistency with institutional policy, learner-centered tone, rationale and writing. Completeness is checked against the elements the prompt listed. Clarity is judged on whether a student could predict the consequence of an action, which is why the example avoids words such as reasonable. Consistency asks whether course rules sit within the university's, so the integrity policy refers to the code instead of rewriting it. Tone is scored where rules read as threats rather than agreements. The rationale row wants sources connected to specific choices, and the writing row checks format and mechanics. Sections that include a peer review round often add a usability row, scored by whether a classmate could answer three questions about a late assignment using only your text.
NURS 6370 Week 3 help from the desk
The costliest habit here is vague language: submit work in a timely manner, attend regularly, extensions may be granted. None of these can be applied the same way to two students. Another loss is a missing exception clause, or an exception with no one named to decide it. Students often copy the university integrity code into the syllabus, which creates two versions of one rule. Some mix the rationale into the policies, making the rules harder to find. Write each policy so a student could calculate their own outcome from it, keep the tone even, and save your reasons for the note underneath.
Get a NURS 6370 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt, the rubric and any institutional policy language your section wants matched, and a NURS 6370 Week 3 syllabus section comes back written against it. First custom one free, inside 24 to 48 hours, with every policy carrying a number, an exception and a named decider.
More NURS 6370 papers and MSN samples
- NURS 6370 Week 1: Discussion post
- NURS 6370 Week 2: Setting comparison
- NURS 6370 Week 4: Session plan
- NURS 6370 Week 5: In-service plan
- NURS 6370 Week 6: Feedback sample
- NURS 6370 Week 7: Competency checklist
- NURS 6370 Week 8: Teaching presentation
- NURS 6370 Week 9: Discussion post
- NURS 6370 Week 10: Education documentation
- NURS 6370 Week 11: Skills self-assessment
- NURS 6351 Week 3: Competency self-assessment
- NURS 6341 Week 3: Search strategy
- NURS 6331 Week 3: Modality comparison
- NURS 6321 Week 3: Learning objectives
NURS 6370 Week 3 questions, answered
Which policies does the example include?
Late work, attendance and academic integrity, because those three carry the most disputes and the most rubric weight. Prompts often name their own set, sometimes adding technology use or communication expectations, and each additional policy is built on the same four elements rather than on a new pattern. The structure holds however long the list gets.
Do the policies have to match an institutional handbook?
Where a prompt says so, yes, and the example points at the code rather than paraphrasing it, since a paraphrase that drifts creates two rules on the same question. A course policy may add specifics the handbook leaves open, and the example does that twice, but it never contradicts the document sitting above it.
Is a syllabus section written for students or for administrators?
Both read it, and the rubric usually rewards writing that works for the first without failing the second. The example keeps the rules plain enough for a student to act on and precise enough for an administrator to apply, then puts the reasoning in a separate paragraph so neither reader has to hunt for what binds them.
Where can I find a free NURS 6370 Week 3 sample paper?
This page shows the entire Week 3 syllabus section at no charge, with all three policies and the rationale note. A custom policy set for the course and policies your prompt names can be drafted free on request.
Should the NURS 6370 syllabus policies cite sources?
The policies themselves normally do not, because students read them as rules. The rationale that follows them should, and most rubrics score that rationale separately, which is why the example keeps the two apart.