| Course | NURS 6370 Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 7 |
| Paper type | Competency checklist |
| Length | About 600 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 6370 Week 7
Competency Checklist: Containing and Cleaning a Hazardous Drug Spill of Less Than 5 mL at the Bedside
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 6370: Foundational Skills for Nurse Educators in Academic and Healthcare Environments
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Competency Checklist: Containing and Cleaning a Hazardous Drug Spill of Less Than 5 mL at the Bedside
Instructions to the Observer
Use this form for one nurse at a time during a simulated spill in the skills room or an actual spill on the unit. Mark each item Met or Not met; there is no partial rating. Items marked with an asterisk are critical: Not met on any critical item is a fail for the whole check, whatever the other results. Do not prompt the nurse during the check. Source for every step: unit policy HD-04, Hazardous Drug Spills, which adopts the Oncology Nursing Society's safe handling guidance (Polovich & Olsen, 2018).
Checklist
Table 1
Spill of Less Than 5 mL: Items in the Order Performed
| No. | The nurse | Met | Not met |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Closes the roller clamp or stops the source of the leak | ||
| 2* | Tells the patient and anyone nearby to stay clear of the spill | ||
| 3 | Brings the spill kit from its marked location | ||
| 4 | Places the spill warning sign beside the spill | ||
| 5 | Puts on the kit gown, closed at the back, cuffs over the wrists | ||
| 6* | Puts on two pairs of chemotherapy-tested gloves, inner pair under the gown cuff and outer pair over it | ||
| 7 | Puts on the kit eye protection | ||
| 8 | Puts on the respiratory protection named in HD-04 for spills | ||
| 9 | Covers the liquid with absorbent pads, working from the outer edge inward | ||
| 10* | Picks up any broken glass with the kit scoop, never with the hands | ||
| 11 | Places glass in the hazardous drug sharps container | ||
| 12 | Places the soaked pads in the kit waste bag | ||
| 13 | Cleans the area with the kit detergent, from the least to the most contaminated part | ||
| 14 | Rinses the area with clean water and dries it with new pads | ||
| 15 | Repeats the detergent clean and rinse once | ||
| 16 | Removes the outer gloves into the waste bag | ||
| 17 | Removes the gown by rolling it inside out, into the waste bag | ||
| 18 | Removes eye and respiratory protection by the straps | ||
| 19 | Removes the inner gloves last, into the waste bag | ||
| 20 | Seals the waste bag and places it in the hazardous waste container | ||
| 21* | Washes hands with soap and water | ||
| 22 | Reports the spill to the charge nurse and enters an event report, including any skin contact |
Sign-Off
Nurse name and employee number. Observer name and credentials. Date. Setting: simulated in the skills room, or actual spill on the unit (circle one). Result: Pass, or Fail with the item numbers not met. Nurse signature, confirming the result was discussed. Observer signature.
Remediation Path
After a fail, the unit educator arranges a coached practice and a repeat check in the skills room within seven days, and the nurse may not administer intravenous hazardous drugs until the repeat is passed. After a second fail, the nurse, the unit educator and the nurse manager meet within five days to agree a written plan. Results are filed in the nurse's education record for the length of employment.
Design Note for the Course Faculty
Each item begins with a verb an observer can see and contains no adverb, because words such as properly or carefully move the standard into the observer's head, and checklists are only as reliable as the agreement between the people using them (Oermann & Gaberson, 2021). Critical items are the four steps whose omission would expose the nurse or others regardless of what else was done. Documenting the check this way, with setting, observer and result, supports the competency verification the professional development standards expect (Harper & Maloney, 2022).
References
Harper, M. G., & Maloney, P. (Eds.). (2022). Nursing professional development: Scope and standards of practice (4th ed.). Association for Nursing Professional Development.
Oermann, M. H., & Gaberson, K. B. (2021). Evaluation and testing in nursing education (6th ed.). Springer Publishing.
Polovich, M., & Olsen, M. M. (Eds.). (2018). Safe handling of hazardous drugs (3rd ed.). Oncology Nursing Society.
Reading the NURS 6370 Week 7 instructions
The Week 7 assignment usually asks you to develop a competency validation tool or skills checklist for a procedure relevant to your setting, with observable performance criteria, a scoring method, critical elements and a plan for learners who do not meet the standard. Many sections require the tool to be based on a current guideline or policy and ask for a brief rationale. The submission is often the checklist plus one or two pages of explanation. Choose a single procedure small enough to observe in one sitting. If your prompt names a format, such as a rubric with levels, follow it even if a binary list would be simpler. A few sections also ask who will use the tool and how often competency is revalidated, which belongs in the instructions to the observer.
Inside the NURS 6370 Week 7 example
Observer instructions come first and set the rules: one nurse at a time, no prompting, binary marks, asterisks for critical items and the policy source for every step. Table 1 lists the 22 items from stopping the leak to reporting the spill, with donning and doffing in their required order and glass handled only with the scoop. The sign-off block records the setting, the result and both signatures. The remediation path gives a seven-day repeat check, a restriction until it is passed and a meeting after a second fail. A design note ties the no-adverb rule to observer agreement and the documentation to professional development standards.
Reading the NURS 6370 Week 7 rubric
Checklist rubrics generally score observability of criteria, completeness and sequence, scoring method, critical elements, remediation, evidence base and presentation. Observability is judged item by item, and adverbs such as correctly are the usual loss. Completeness and sequence are checked against the guideline, so an out-of-order step is visible. The scoring row rewards a method two observers would apply the same way. Critical elements are expected in most prompts. Remediation is scored on specificity, including who arranges it and when. Evidence asks for a current source, and presentation checks that the form could be printed and used. Where the prompt asks for piloting, the strongest submissions report whether two observers reached the same result on the same performance.
NURS 6370 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost marks
The mistake that undermines most checklists is criteria nobody can observe: performs hand hygiene appropriately, demonstrates understanding, maintains safety. Another is scope creep, one form trying to cover a whole category of skills. Partial credit columns invite opinion and make two observers disagree. Many forms weigh every item equally, so missing the double gloves counts the same as forgetting the warning sign. Some omit the remediation plan or leave it to be decided later. Pick one procedure, write each step as an action, mark the few steps that decide safety and say exactly what follows a fail.
Get a NURS 6370 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt, the rubric and the skill your section assigns, and a NURS 6370 Week 7 checklist comes back on that skill with critical items marked and a remediation path attached. First custom one free, in 24 to 48 hours. Names, dates and sign-offs on real staff belong to the health system that collected them.
More NURS 6370 papers and MSN samples
- NURS 6370 Week 1: Discussion post
- NURS 6370 Week 2: Setting comparison
- NURS 6370 Week 3: Syllabus section
- NURS 6370 Week 4: Session plan
- NURS 6370 Week 5: In-service plan
- NURS 6370 Week 6: Feedback sample
- NURS 6370 Week 8: Teaching presentation
- NURS 6370 Week 9: Discussion post
- NURS 6370 Week 10: Education documentation
- NURS 6370 Week 11: Skills self-assessment
- NURS 6351 Week 7: Observation write-up
- NURS 6341 Week 7: Case analysis
- NURS 6331 Week 7: Simulation scenario
- NURS 6321 Week 7: Rubric draft
NURS 6370 Week 7 questions, answered
How many items does a checklist need?
The example runs twenty-two for one procedure, and prompts rarely set a count. What governs is the procedure itself, since every step where a nurse could go wrong needs a line and steps nobody can observe need none. Forms running past forty items are usually covering more than one skill without admitting it.
Why is there no partial credit column?
Because the document is a competency check rather than a grade. A middle column invites the observer to record an impression, and two observers then produce different results on the same nurse. Binary scoring with four critical items carries the seriousness a partial column is usually reaching for, and it survives review afterward.
Does the checklist need a cited source?
Most rubrics expect one and the example prints it on the form rather than in a reference list, since the form is what travels to the bedside. A current guideline or an institutional procedure both work. What gives up the row is a checklist whose items came from memory, which becomes visible the moment a step appears out of order.
Where can I find a free NURS 6370 Week 7 sample paper?
The full 22-item checklist, with instructions, sign-off, remediation path and design note, is on this page free of charge. A custom checklist for the procedure and policy your section names can be requested at no cost.
Can a NURS 6370 checklist use a rating scale instead of Met and Not met?
Yes, if your prompt asks for levels. Define each level by what the observer sees, not by how well it seemed, and keep the critical items pass or fail whichever scale you use.