NURS 6001 · Week 2

NURS 6001 Week 2 paraphrase comparison set example

Foundations of Graduate Study Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Integrity is taught through contrast in NURS 6001's second week, and the comparison set shown here puts one passage from a nursing source beside three reworkings: a patchwritten version, a correctly quoted version and a genuine paraphrase. Annotations mark what each version borrowed, and a closing note reads a similarity report the way faculty read one.

What this page holds

Patchwriting, quotation and true paraphrase are set against one source passage in a paraphrase comparison set for NURS 6001 Week 2, each version annotated against academic integrity standards. Searches like "nurs 6001 week 2 assignment example", "nurs6001 week 2 sample" and "nurs 6001 week 2 example" land here.

What a finished NURS 6001 Week 2 paraphrase comparison set looks like

The source passage opens the page, a few sentences from a peer-reviewed article on interruptions during medication administration, set as a block with its citation. Three versions follow, labeled A, B and C. Version A swaps synonyms into the original sentence skeleton and keeps its order, the pattern known as patchwriting; the annotation beside it highlights each borrowed structure. Version B quotes the key sentence exactly, with quotation marks and a page locator, and explains when quotation is the better choice. Version C restates the idea in new structure and vocabulary, still cited, because a paraphrase without attribution remains a borrowing. A short paragraph then interprets a similarity percentage, noting that matched text flags material for review rather than proving misconduct. The set closes with the author's own rule for when to quote.

How a NURS 6001 Week 2 example is structured

Order runs from wrong to right, which lets the reader watch the defect disappear. Opening with the correct paraphrase would bury the lesson, since the reason a paraphrase works is only visible next to one that fails. Each version sits in its own labeled block with the annotation directly beneath, so a marker can compare the text and the explanation without scrolling. Version A's annotation is the longest, because patchwriting is the problem the week exists to expose and the one returning nurses rarely recognize in their own drafts. The similarity paragraph comes after the three versions rather than before them; by then the reader understands what the software can and cannot see. The author's personal rule on quoting closes the piece and turns the exercise into a standing habit for the program's later papers.

The source, shown whole

A short passage from one nursing article is reproduced exactly and cited, so every later version can be checked word for word against the original.

Version A and its borrowed skeleton

Synonyms replace the nouns and verbs, but sentence order and clause structure survive intact. The annotation marks each inherited structure, which is what patchwriting means in practice.

Version B, quoted correctly

Quotation marks, author, year and a page locator all appear. The note explains that exact wording earns its place only when the phrasing itself matters, as with a definition.

Version C, a real paraphrase

New structure, new vocabulary and the same citation. The annotation stresses that paraphrasing changes the words, never the obligation to credit the idea.

Reading the similarity report

One paragraph explains that a similarity percentage marks matched strings for a human to review. Quoted and properly cited material can match without any misconduct at all.

Where marks go in NURS 6001 Week 2

Recognition earns most of the credit here, ahead of production. Faculty want evidence that the author can see why Version A fails, so the annotation must name the borrowed structure rather than calling the version too close. A second row checks that Version C is a paraphrase in fact, which markers test by comparing sentence skeletons, not word lists. APA mechanics carry their own weight: the quotation needs its locator, the paraphrase needs its citation, and both reference entries must match the in-text credit. Pieces lose ground when the paraphrase simply reorders clauses, when the similarity paragraph treats a low percentage as proof of originality, or when the chosen source is a website rather than a scholarly nursing article. A brief closing rule on quoting is inexpensive to include and shows the lesson transferring beyond the exercise.

Get a NURS 6001 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Share the Week 2 task and the rubric from your section, plus the source passage if your instructor supplied one, and a comparison set gets written on that text. It costs nothing the first time and comes back within 24 to 48 hours, every annotation included so the reasoning behind each version stays visible.

NURS 6001 Week 2 questions, answered

Which source does the example use for its passage?

A short excerpt from a peer-reviewed nursing article on interruptions during medication administration, chosen because the topic is familiar to most practicing RNs. Any passage your instructor supplies or approves can replace it. What matters for the rubric is that the source is scholarly and the passage is dense enough that a careless paraphrase would visibly fail.

Is patchwriting treated as a form of plagiarism?

Faculty generally treat it as improper borrowing, because the sentence structure belongs to the original author even when every word has changed. The example stays out of policy interpretation and shows the pattern instead, so it can be recognized on sight. For the rules that govern your own submission, the academic integrity policy published by the university is the authority, and the sample sits inside it.

Does a paraphrase still need a citation?

Always. A paraphrase changes the words and structure, but the idea still belongs to its source, so APA 7 requires the author and year in text and a matching reference entry. Page or paragraph locators are encouraged for paraphrase and required for quotation. The example includes both kinds of citation so the difference is visible in one place, and your version adopts whichever emphasis your instructor sets.