Five sources get screened for Week 4 of NURS 6001 in this scholarly source screen example, each judged on identical criteria and handed a keep, qualify or reject verdict. Searches like "nurs 6001 week 4 assignment example", "nurs6001 week 4 sample" and "nurs 6001 week 4 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 6001 Week 4 scholarly source screen looks like
Topic comes first, fatigue among nurses working consecutive twelve-hour shifts, followed by a screening table with five rows and six columns. The columns apply the CRAAP criteria, currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose, plus a sixth asking whether the source is peer reviewed and how that was confirmed. Every cell holds a short judgment rather than a checkmark, so the reasoning behind each rating is on the page. A paragraph per source then defends its verdict. The trade feature is kept only as background, the fact sheet is kept for definitions, the blog is rejected for undisclosed sponsorship, the textbook chapter is qualified as dated, and the trial is kept as primary evidence. What the author still needs, a source type none of the five supplies, is named at the close.
How a NURS 6001 Week 4 example is structured
Comparison happens in the table and judgment in the prose, and the two are kept apart on purpose. Placing all five sources in one grid lets a reader scan a single criterion down the column, which is how differences in authority or currency become obvious. The paragraphs afterward follow the same row order, so each verdict can be matched to its line of the table without searching. Verification gets its own column instead of a footnote because claims that an article is peer reviewed are the ones markers most often check; the example names the method used, the journal's editorial policy or a serials directory. Its last paragraph looks forward rather than summarizing. Naming the missing source type, a systematic review in this case, shows the screen producing a decision about the next search.
One topic, five candidates
Mixing source types on a single topic is deliberate. The contrast between a blog and a trial is only instructive when both claim to answer the same question.
Criteria applied in a grid
Currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose each get a column, and every cell carries a phrase of reasoning. Checkmarks would hide the judgment the week is testing.
Peer review, verified
A dedicated column records how peer-reviewed status was confirmed. Assuming it from a journal's name is the shortcut this column exists to prevent.
Keep, qualify or reject
Three verdicts rather than two let useful but limited material stay in play. The fact sheet survives for definitions even though it cannot carry an argument.
What the screen still lacks
The missing evidence type, and why it matters, closes the piece. That forward step turns an evaluation exercise into a working research decision.
Where marks go in NURS 6001 Week 4
A screen is judged by its verdicts, and verdicts only count when the reasoning under them is visible. The example earns the evaluation row by writing a justification in every cell instead of rating sources on a scale, which lets faculty disagree with a judgment while still crediting how it was reached. Distinguishing scholarly from popular sources is the second row, and the three-verdict system handles gray cases that a keep-or-reject split would force into error. Currency is often misread: the example ties its window to when shift practice last changed rather than to an arbitrary five years. Deductions typically land on screens that treat any .gov or .edu address as authoritative, and on screens that rate a trial highly while overlooking that every participant was drawn from one hospital unit.
Get a NURS 6001 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Hand over your Week 4 instructions and rubric, and list any sources your instructor supplied or ones you are already weighing. Those get screened, not invented ones, against the criteria your course uses. Free the first time, turned around in 24 to 48 hours, with every verdict reasoned so you can test your own judgment against it.
NURS 6001 Week 4 questions, answered
What is the CRAAP test the example uses?
It is a widely taught checklist for judging sources on currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose, developed by librarians at California State University, Chico. The example uses it because many nursing instructors recognize it, though some sections prefer their own criteria or a library rubric. Whichever set your course names, the screen written for you applies that set and shows reasoning in every cell.
Can a government website ever be a scholarly source?
Rarely as a primary study, often as an authority for definitions, surveillance data or policy. The example keeps its fact sheet for exactly that narrow use and says so. What loses credit is treating a government page as peer-reviewed research. Your rubric may allow a set number of non-scholarly sources, and the sample respects that limit while keeping each one in its proper role.
Is Week 4 of NURS 6001 always a source screen?
Not in every version. Course versions differ, and the week labels on this shelf follow the order these skills usually arrive in rather than a published syllabus. Some sections fold source evaluation into the library week or into the research analysis that follows. Whatever your classroom lists for Week 4 governs the sample, and the screening grid adapts to that task.