| Course | MRKT 4504 Global Marketing |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 10 |
| Paper type | Campaign adaptation |
| Length | About 780 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MRKT 4504 Week 10
The Promise Holds, the Wrapping Changes: Adapting a Barbecue Sauce Campaign for a Composite Southeast Asian Market by Keeping One Claim Fixed, Rebuilding Scene, Tagline and Media, and Back-Translating the Result
Student Name
Walden University
MRKT 4504: Global Marketing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Promise Holds, the Wrapping Changes: Adapting a Barbecue Sauce Campaign for a Composite Southeast Asian Market by Keeping One Claim Fixed, Rebuilding Scene, Tagline and Media, and Back-Translating the Result
The Home Campaign
In the United States, Ember County Smokehouse's campaign sells one promise: smokehouse flavor without spending hours at a smoker. The television and online spots show a backyard grill, a crowd of friends at a tailgate before a college football game and a father brushing sauce onto ribs. The tagline reads "All the pit. None of the wait." The campaign runs on regional television during football season, in grocery store circulars with a dollar-off coupon and on social media in the weeks before summer holidays.
What Holds and What Changes
In Market A, the promise can hold: shoppers there also want rich, smoky flavor without long cooking. Almost everything around the promise cannot. Few households grill, football tailgates mean nothing, and the cultural analysis found that bottled sauces are used as table condiments for shared meals. Okazaki et al. (2006) found that advertising standardization can improve performance when the market conditions and consumer responses are similar, but the home campaign's scenes rest on habits Market A does not share. The core claim stays; the scene, tagline and media change.
Table 1
Home Campaign and Adapted Campaign
| Element | Home version | Adapted version for Market A | |
|---|---|---|
| Core claim | Smokehouse flavor without the hours | Unchanged | |
| Scene | Backyard grill, tailgate crowd | Weeknight family dinner with several shared dishes; the sauce passed around the table with roast chicken and rice | |
| Tagline | "All the pit. None of the wait." | Transcreated local-language line meaning roughly "Smokehouse flavor, right at your table" | |
| Media | Regional television, grocery circulars, social media before holidays | In-store tastings at partner supermarkets, short social videos, recipe content with food creators | |
| Offer | Dollar-off coupon | Free tasting and a small bottle sample with purchase of rice or meat at partner stores | |
Composite company and market.
The Tagline
The home tagline depends on English wordplay and on knowing what a barbecue pit is. Translated word for word, it would be meaningless or confusing. The adapted tagline was transcreated: a local copywriter wrote a new line in the local language that carries the same claim, smoky flavor without the effort, in words that fit the table-condiment use. To check that the claim survived, an independent translator back-translated the new line into English without seeing the original. The back-translation read "Smokehouse taste, right at your dinner table." That keeps the claim, smoky flavor delivered easily, while dropping the grill. Brislin (1970) proposed back-translation as a check on meaning across languages, and Douglas and Craig (2007) recommended pairing it with discussion between translators and the marketer, which the importer's bilingual staff provided.
Checking Claims Against Advertising Rules
Every claim in the adapted campaign was rechecked against Market A's composite advertising rules, which, like many countries' rules, require that food claims be substantiated and that flavorings not be presented as natural processes. "Smokehouse taste" is acceptable because it describes flavor. Any wording suggesting the sauce is smoked over wood was removed, since the regulatory note found that the smoke flavor comes from added smoke flavoring. The product shots show the sauce on a table, not near a fire.
Media Choices
Television is dropped, which also frees most of the budget the home campaign spends on airtime. A barbecue sauce new to most shoppers will not be bought because of a television spot; it will be bought after someone tastes it. The adapted campaign therefore starts in stores, with tastings at the supermarket outlets chosen in the channel comparison, supported by short social videos showing the sauce at family meals and recipe posts by local food creators. De Mooij argues that communication in higher-context cultures relies more on images and settings than on explicit claims (de Mooij, 2019), which supports building the campaign on scenes of shared meals rather than on product claims.
Budget and Measures
The adapted campaign's first-year budget is about $40,000, roughly half for tastings and half for social content and creators. It will be judged on two measures: trial-to-purchase conversion at tastings, meaning how many tasters buy a bottle, and repeat purchase through the partner chains' loyalty data, where available. Cateora et al. (2020) note that new imported foods often need trial before advertising can work; these measures test whether trial is turning into regular use. If tasters buy but do not return, the problem is likely the bottle size or price, which the adaptation brief already plans to address; if tasters do not buy at all, the scene and tagline need another look before more money is spent on content.
References
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Cateora, P. R., Money, R. B., Gilly, M. C., & Graham, J. L. (2020). International marketing (18th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
de Mooij, M. (2019). Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising (3rd ed.). Sage.
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.1.030
Okazaki, S., Taylor, C. R., & Zou, S. (2006). Advertising standardization's positive impact on the bottom line: A model of when and how standardization improves financial and strategic performance. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350302
What the MRKT 4504 Week 10 instructions ask for
Week 10 asks you to adapt one marketing campaign for your target market. Describe the home campaign first. Identify the core claim that should stay fixed and explain why. Show what changes in scene, tagline, media and offer, setting the two versions side by side. If the tagline does not translate, explain how it was transcreated and how you checked that the claim survived, for example through back-translation. Recheck every claim against the market's advertising and labeling rules. Choose media that fit how customers in the market will first meet the product, and close with a budget and measures that would show whether the campaign is turning trial into regular purchase.
How the MRKT 4504 Week 10 example is put together
The paper opens with the home campaign's grill, tailgate, tagline and coupons. A section explains that the promise holds while the scenes do not, citing Okazaki and colleagues on when standardization pays. A table sets the two versions side by side on claim, scene, tagline, media and offer. A section explains transcreation and back-translation of the tagline, citing Brislin and Douglas and Craig. A section rechecks claims against composite advertising rules and removes any suggestion of wood smoking. A section explains the move from television to tastings and social content, citing de Mooij. A closing section sets a $40,000 budget and two measures, citing Cateora and colleagues. Each change in the table is tied back to an earlier finding, from the cultural habit to the regulatory note.
Where the marks sit in the MRKT 4504 Week 10 rubric
Campaign adaptations earn credit for holding the right element fixed and changing the rest with reasons. Identifying and keeping the core claim is weighted heavily. Side-by-side versions make the changes clear. Transcreation with a back-translation check shows command of cross-cultural communication. Rechecking claims against local rules shows responsibility. Media choices linked to how customers first meet the product show strategic thinking. A budget with measures of trial and repeat purchase makes the campaign accountable. Adaptations that translate a tagline word for word, keep culturally specific scenes or ignore advertising rules score lower. Pairing home and adapted elements in one table makes each change easy to follow. Media choices justified by how shoppers first meet the product are valued over media chosen because the home campaign used them.
MRKT 4504 Week 10 help from the desk
Write down the single promise your home campaign makes, in one sentence. Then list everything else in the campaign: the setting, the people, the jokes, the tagline, the media. For each, ask whether a customer in the new market would understand it and relate to it. Keep the promise; rebuild whatever does not travel. If your tagline relies on wordplay, have a local writer create a new one and check it by back-translation. Students often translate the home ad directly, which can produce lines that make no sense or mean something unintended. Another common gap is ignoring local advertising rules. For help organizing a back-translation, our writers can draft the steps for your language pair.
Get a MRKT 4504 Week 10 example written to your instructions
Forward the campaign adaptation prompt for Week 10 with its rubric and the home campaign being adapted; a rebuilt version holding one claim constant, back-translation included, returns in 24 to 48 hours, the opening request free. Without a home campaign to work from, the sample reworks a composite sauce advertisement.
More MRKT 4504 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MRKT 4504 Week 1: Export Motives Discussion Post
- MRKT 4504 Week 2: CAGE Country Screening
- MRKT 4504 Week 3: Cultural Analysis Paper
- MRKT 4504 Week 4: Food Label Regulatory Note
- MRKT 4504 Week 5: International Research Memo
- MRKT 4504 Week 6: Market Entry Mode Case
- MRKT 4504 Week 7: Product Adaptation Brief
- MRKT 4504 Week 8: International Channel Comparison
- MRKT 4504 Week 9: Export Pricing Note
- MRKT 4504 Week 11: International Entry Plan
- BUSI 2001 Week 10: Gateway Case Comparison
- MRKT 4503 Week 10: Services Pricing Note
- BUSI 3010 Week 10: Process Improvement Proposal
- MRKT 4501 Week 10: Marketing Control Plan
MRKT 4504 Week 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MRKT 4504 Week 10 sample paper?
The campaign adaptation, with both versions side by side, appears below at no cost.
What claim stays fixed in the MRKT 4504 Week 10 campaign?
Smokehouse flavor without spending hours cooking.
What replaces the backyard grill scene?
A weeknight family dinner of shared dishes with the sauce passed around the table.
How was the tagline checked?
An independent translator back-translated it as "Smokehouse taste, right at your dinner table."
Why is television dropped?
Shoppers need to taste an unfamiliar sauce before advertising can persuade them.