| Course | MMHA 6501 Leadership Within the Healthcare Sector |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 7 |
| Paper type | Emotional intelligence incident analysis |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MMHA 6501 Week 7
Ten Minutes at the Nurses' Station: An Emotional Intelligence Analysis of a Family Complaint on the Long-Stay Unit
Student Name
Walden University
MMHA 6501: Leadership Within the Healthcare Sector
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Ten Minutes at the Nurses' Station: An Emotional Intelligence Analysis of a Family Complaint on the Long-Stay Unit
The Incident
On a weekday afternoon on the long-stay unit of Maple Terrace, a fictional 120-bed skilled nursing facility, the daughter of a resident arrived to find her mother sitting in a wet brief, having pressed her call light about twenty minutes earlier. The daughter walked to the nurses' station and, in a raised voice, said that this was the third time this month and that she wanted to know who was responsible. The unit manager, a registered nurse, was at the station reviewing medication records. Two certified nursing assistants were nearby, and a resident in a wheelchair was parked by the station waiting to go to activities. The next ten minutes are reconstructed below from the unit manager's own account and the CNAs' recollections. The resident and her family are composites.
Timeline
Table 1 breaks the ten minutes into five moments and records what the unit manager said or did in each.
Table 1
Five Moments in the Encounter
| Moment | Time | What the unit manager said or did |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 to 1 minute | Looked up, felt her face flush, set down her pen and said, "I hear you. Give me one second." Paused before speaking further. |
| 2 | 1 to 3 minutes | Said, "Our policy is to answer call lights within fifteen minutes, and we are short one aide today." |
| 3 | 3 to 5 minutes | Daughter said, louder, that she did not care about policy. Unit manager stated again that the unit was short-staffed and that she would write up the delay. |
| 4 | 5 to 8 minutes | Noticed the resident by the station watching and the CNAs standing still. Asked one CNA to take the waiting resident to activities and the other to go to the mother's room now. Invited the daughter to sit in the small family room. |
| 5 | 8 to 10 minutes | In the family room, said, "Your mother waited too long, and I'm sorry. Tell me about the other two times." Listened, took notes and agreed to call the daughter the next day with what she learned. |
Reading the Moments Against Goleman's Domains
Goleman (1998) describes emotional intelligence as a set of five capacities, running from knowing one's own reactions and governing them, through drive, to reading other people and handling relationships. The analysis below uses four of these, since each moment of the encounter tests a different one. Leadership research treats these capacities as especially important when a leader must manage conflict in front of others (Northouse, 2021).
Moment 1: self-awareness and self-regulation held. The unit manager noticed her own physical reaction, a flush of embarrassment and defensiveness, and paused before speaking. Her first words acknowledged the daughter without arguing. This was the encounter's strongest moment of self-regulation: she did not respond in kind to a raised voice.
Moment 2: empathy came out as a policy explanation. Her second response cited the fifteen-minute standard and the staffing shortage. Both facts were true, and from her side they were an explanation. From the daughter's side, they sounded like an excuse, and possibly like a claim that twenty minutes was close enough. Empathy in Goleman's sense means sensing what the other person is feeling and responding to that. The daughter was frightened and angry about her mother's dignity, not asking about policy.
Moment 3: the explanation repeated. When the daughter escalated, the unit manager restated the staffing explanation. Repeating a response that has already failed is a common sign that self-regulation is under strain: the manager was defending rather than listening, and the conversation was escalating in front of staff and a resident.
Moment 4: social skill recovered the situation. The unit manager noticed the audience, gave the CNAs clear tasks, attended to the waiting resident and moved the conversation to a private room. This combined awareness of the social setting with practical action, and it addressed the immediate need, the mother's care, before continuing the discussion.
Moment 5: empathy arrived. In private, she named what had happened plainly, apologized without qualification and asked to hear more. This is the response the daughter needed at moment 2.
Alternative Behaviors
At moment 2: instead of explaining policy, say what the daughter is seeing and feeling: "Your mother has been waiting and she's wet. That's not okay. I'm sending someone right now." Then send a CNA immediately. The staffing explanation can come later, if at all.
At moment 3: when a response fails, change it rather than repeat it. A useful internal cue is to notice the urge to explain again and instead ask a question, such as "What happened the other times?"
At moment 4, earlier: the move to a private room was right but came five minutes late. A unit manager can make it a habit to invite any upset visitor to sit down somewhere private within the first minute, after first sending help to the resident.
Why This Matters for the Unit
A unit manager's response to an angry family member teaches the CNAs who watch it how the unit treats complaints. If the lesson is that complaints are met with policy, staff will learn to explain rather than listen. If the lesson is that the resident comes first and complaints are taken seriously, staff will copy that. Leaders shape culture through how they react to critical incidents, which members watch closely for clues about what really matters (Schein & Schein, 2017). The CNAs who were standing still during moments 2 and 3 were waiting to see what to do, and they did nothing until they were given a task. The same incident is also information: three delays in a month for one resident may indicate a pattern on that hall, which the unit manager should review with the CNAs rather than treat as one family's grievance.
One Behavior to Practice
The behavior the unit manager will practice is to respond to the feeling before the facts: in the first sentence to an upset family member or resident, name what they are experiencing and say what she will do now, before offering any explanation. She will practice it in the morning huddle, using short role plays with the charge nurses once a week for a month, and in real encounters. A colleague would notice the change by listening to her first sentence in such encounters; the director of nursing has agreed to observe two family conversations over the next month and tell her whether her first sentence named the person's concern or the unit's policy. Emotional intelligence competencies can be learned with practice and feedback over time (Goleman, 1998), which is why the plan relies on repetition rather than a single insight.
References
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
The Walden MMHA 6501 Week 7 instructions
Critical incident analyses ask you to examine a specific leadership moment in enough detail to learn from it. Describe the incident first in neutral terms: who was present, what happened and what was said, without judgment. Break the encounter into moments, ideally in a timeline, so each decision point is visible. Read each moment against the framework's domains, noting honestly where the leader did well as well as where the response slipped. For each slip, write a specific alternative behavior, phrased so it could be used next time. Connect the incident to the wider unit, since staff learn from what they watch. End with one behavior to practice and a concrete way a colleague would notice whether it is happening.
How this MMHA 6501 Week 7 example is built
The incident section describes the daughter, the unit manager, the two CNAs and the waiting resident. Table 1 lists five moments over ten minutes with what the manager said or did. The analysis introduces Goleman's capacities, cites Northouse on conflict before others, and reads each moment: a pause that held, a policy explanation that missed the feeling, a repeated explanation, a recovery through tasks and a private room, and a plain apology. Alternatives are given for moments 2, 3 and 4. A section on the unit cites Schein and Schein on how leaders' reactions teach staff. The final section commits to naming the person's concern first and asks the director of nursing to observe two conversations.
Reading the MMHA 6501 Week 7 rubric
Incident analyses are graded on precision and honesty. A neutral description and a timeline that separates moments earn the first share. Accurate application of the emotional intelligence framework to each moment earns the largest share, and graders look for balance: recognizing what went well as well as what did not. Alternative behaviors must be concrete enough to use. Linking the incident to its effect on staff and culture shows insight. A single, observable practice behavior with a named observer distinguishes strong work from general resolutions. Structure and APA references count for a little. Instructors also notice whether the student names who was watching and what they likely learned, since leadership behavior is always public. A reflective rather than defensive tone is expected throughout.
MMHA 6501 Week 7 help from the desk
Many incident papers either defend the leader or condemn her. Do neither. Describe what happened as a camera would, then examine each moment on its own terms. Use the framework's domains specifically, and say which one each moment tests. When a response slipped, write the sentence you would say instead. Notice who else was watching, because their lesson matters. Choose one behavior to practice, not five, and name someone who will tell you honestly whether it is happening. Keep the tone reflective rather than confessional. We can write an emotional intelligence analysis of a leadership incident from your own workplace, with names and details changed.
Get a MMHA 6501 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Say whether your section wants an emotional intelligence or a communication focus, and attach the Week 7 prompt and rubric; the incident analysis is ready in 24-48 hours at no cost the first time. Describe a different role or setting if you prefer, and the incident is placed there.
More MMHA 6501 papers and MHA samples
- MMHA 6501 Week 1: Adaptive-Technical Framing Brief
- MMHA 6501 Week 2: Leadership Theory Discussion Post
- MMHA 6501 Week 3: Organizational Culture Diagnosis
- MMHA 6501 Week 4: Change Management Memo
- MMHA 6501 Week 5: Dyad Leadership Memo
- MMHA 6501 Week 6: Staff Retention Analysis
- MMHA 6501 Week 8: Just Culture Position Paper
- MMHA 6501 Week 9: Leadership Development Plan
- MMHA 6501 Week 10: Reliability Dashboard Synthesis
- MMHA 6501 Week 11: Capstone Recommendation Memo
- MMHA 6475 Week 7: Program Operating Budget
- MMHA 6452 Week 7: Volunteer Role Description
- MMHA 6451 Week 7: Stakeholder Impact Table
- MMHA 6400 Week 7: Flexible Budget Variance Report
MMHA 6501 Week 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MMHA 6501 Week 7 sample paper?
The critical incident analysis, timeline included, is free to read here.
What incident does the MMHA 6501 Week 7 paper analyze?
A daughter confronting a unit manager at the nurses' station after finding her mother waiting in a wet brief.
Where did empathy slip?
When the manager explained the call-light policy and staffing instead of responding to the daughter's fear and anger.
What recovered the situation?
Giving the CNAs clear tasks, attending to the waiting resident and moving the conversation to a private room.
What behavior will the manager practice?
Naming the person's concern first, before any explanation, observed by the director of nursing.