| Course | MHRM 6901 Capstone: Strategic Human Resource Management |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 9 |
| Paper type | Appendix set |
| Length | About 550 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Human Resource Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MHRM 6901 Week 9
The Capstone's Appendix Set Under One Rule: An Appendix Stays Only if a Named Section Sends the Reader to It, With Five Kept, Each Cited, and a List of What Was Cut
Student Name
Walden University
MHRM 6901: Capstone: Strategic Human Resource Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Capstone's Appendix Set Under One Rule: An Appendix Stays Only if a Named Section Sends the Reader to It, With Five Kept, Each Cited, and a List of What Was Cut
The Rule
Over nine weeks, the Hartwell Baking Company capstone accumulated fourteen pieces of supporting material: tables, interview notes, survey extracts, cost workings and drafts of options later dropped. Left unexamined, all fourteen would end up as appendices. This set applies one rule instead: an appendix stays only if a named section of the final paper sends the reader to it for something the section needs but cannot hold. APA style treats appendices as material that supports the text but would distract if placed within it (American Psychological Association, 2020); the rule adds that the text must actually call on it.
Appendices Kept
Each kept appendix answers a question a reader of the named section would ask: where did that number come from? Minto (2009) argues that supporting detail belongs below the point it supports, available to a reader who wants it and out of the way of one who does not.
Table 1
Appendices Retained and the Sections That Cite Them
| Appendix | Content | Cited by | What the section needs from it | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Register of numbered facts, F1 to F21 | Every section | The source for each fact cited by number | |
| B | Technician demand and supply calculations by year and option | Workforce section | The arithmetic behind the year-one shortfall | |
| C | Pay comparison with illustrative market data and cost workings | Rewards section | How the $370,000 figure was built | |
| D | Apprenticeship design and cost estimate | Recommendation section | The basis for the $250,000 net figure | |
| E | Consistency table between workforce and rewards sections | Reconciliation section | The evidence that the sections now agree | |
Composite organization.
What Was Cut
Table 2
Material Removed and Why
| Material | Reason removed | |
|---|---|
| Full interview notes with two plant managers | No section cites them; the facts used are in the register | |
| January production schedule | Background only; no section relies on it | |
| Draft option to outsource all maintenance to a vendor | Dropped in Week 4; mentioned in one sentence of the workforce section | |
| Exit interview extracts | Summarized in the rewards section; individual extracts raise privacy concerns | |
| Organizational chart | The profile describes structure in words; the chart adds nothing a section uses | |
| Second market survey's raw tables | Superseded by the illustrative figures in Appendix C | |
| Peer workshop comments | Process material; changes they prompted are already in the sections | |
| Photographs of the Janesville floor | Illustrative only; no section refers to them | |
| Customer's proposed schedule in full | Commercially sensitive; the relevant dates are in the register | |
Composite organization.
Checking the Rule
After the cut, every remaining appendix was traced back to at least one sentence in the final paper that names it. Two sections that referred to an appendix later cut, the interview notes, were revised to cite the fact register instead. Booth et al. (2016) note that readers trust a report more when every piece of evidence has a visible place in the argument, and a short, fully cited appendix set serves that trust better than a long one.
Effect on Length
The appendix set fell from about thirty pages to eleven, and the paper's reader no longer has to wonder which appendices matter.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., Williams, J. M., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. T. (2016). The craft of research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Minto, B. (2009). The pyramid principle: Logic in writing and thinking (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
What the MHRM 6901 Week 9 instructions ask for
Week 9 asks you to assemble your capstone's appendices. Gather every piece of supporting material you have produced. Apply a clear rule for keeping material, such as requiring that a named section cite each appendix. List what you keep, which section cites it and what the reader gets from it. Publish what you cut and why, including privacy or confidentiality reasons. Check that every kept appendix is actually cited and that no section points to material you removed. Note the effect on length. Keep each appendix to the material its citing section needs, label the appendices in the order the paper first mentions them, and give every table inside them a number and a title so a reader can find a figure quickly.
How the MHRM 6901 Week 9 example is put together
The brief opens with fourteen candidate items and the rule, citing APA guidance. A table keeps five appendices: the fact register, demand and supply calculations, pay workings, apprenticeship costs and the consistency table, each with its citing section. A paragraph cites Minto on supporting detail. A table lists nine removed items with reasons. A section describes tracing each appendix to a sentence in the paper and revising two sections that cited removed interview notes, citing Booth and colleagues. A final line reports the drop from thirty pages to eleven. The two tables sit side by side in spirit: one shows what the paper now relies on, the other shows what an instructor will not find and the reason, so nothing disappears silently between drafts.
MHRM 6901 Week 9 rubric: what earns full marks
Appendix sets are graded on discipline and traceability. A clear inclusion rule applied consistently earns credit. A table linking each appendix to the section that cites it is weighted heavily. Publishing what was cut, with reasons, shows the removal was deliberate. Attention to privacy and commercial sensitivity demonstrates professional judgment. Checking for broken references shows care. Appendix sets that include everything produced during the course, or appendices no section mentions, receive lower marks. Instructors also notice whether appendix letters follow the order of first mention and whether each can be taken in at a glance, because a reader sent to a twelve-page attachment rarely returns to the argument.
MHRM 6901 Week 9 help: mistakes that cost marks
List everything you have produced for your capstone that is not in the main text. For each item, search your paper for a sentence that sends the reader to it. If none exists, either add a sentence that genuinely needs it or cut the item. Record what you cut and why. Check privacy: interview notes and individual records usually should not appear. Then confirm that every appendix letter mentioned in your paper still exists. Many capstones end with appendices nobody is told to read. If you want help deciding what to keep, send us your list. Students often keep survey extracts because they took effort to gather, yet effort is not a reason a reader needs them; keep the summary figure in the text and cut the raw material.
Get a MHRM 6901 Week 9 example written to your instructions
Attach the appendix instructions and rubric with the capstone body your appendices serve, so every citation can be matched. An index, appendices that each answer a question some section raises, and a record of the material cut arrive in 24 to 48 hours, with a first set free. The register, pay tables and apprenticeship outline describe an imaginary employer.
More MHRM 6901 papers and MS in Human Resource Management samples
- MHRM 6901 Week 1: Capstone Scope Proposal
- MHRM 6901 Week 2: Capstone Organizational Profile
- MHRM 6901 Week 3: Stated Versus Actual Gap Analysis
- MHRM 6901 Week 4: Workforce Planning Section Draft
- MHRM 6901 Week 5: Capstone Peer Workshop
- MHRM 6901 Week 6: Rewards Section Draft
- MHRM 6901 Week 7: Section Reconciliation Memo
- MHRM 6901 Week 8: Capstone Executive Summary
- MHRM 6901 Week 10: Capstone Revision Pass
- MHRM 6901 Week 11: Strategic HR Capstone Paper
- MHRM 6801 Week 9: Organizational Diagnostic Report
- MHRM 6751 Week 9: Virtual Team Norms Memo
- MHRM 6701 Week 9: Departure Counting Objection Memo
- MHRM 6101 Week 9: Reporting Line Peer Reply
MHRM 6901 Week 9 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MHRM 6901 Week 9 sample paper?
The full appendix brief, both tables included, is free to read right here.
What rule does the MHRM 6901 Week 9 set apply?
An appendix stays only if a named section of the paper sends the reader to it.
How many appendices are kept?
Five, each cited by a specific section.
What kinds of material were cut?
Interview notes, a dropped option, exit interview extracts, photographs and commercially sensitive schedules, among others.
How did the appendix set change in length?
It fell from about thirty pages to eleven.