Does a referred worker who leaves for better pay count as failure or success? In its ninth week, MHRM 6701's objection memo tests that tension and proposes counting them twice. Searches like "mhrm 6701 week 9 assignment example", "mhrm6701 week 9 sample" and "mhrm 6701 week 9 example" land here.
What a finished MHRM 6701 Week 9 objection memo looks like
Three pages in memo form, addressed to the pilot's sponsor. The objection is stated in the opening paragraph as sharply as a skeptical director would put it: the staffing case needs referred hires to stay on the overnight shift, the social claim promises them rising earnings, and at a plant where overnight production pays near the bottom of the local range, rising earnings may mean leaving. A section tests whether the tension is real, using the plant's pay ladder: two steps above production, maintenance helper and route driver, with few openings a year. Carroll's pyramid frames the stakes, the economic layer serving as the foundation the other responsibilities rest on. The reply proposes two changes: a posted path into maintenance with paid training, and a reporting rule that records departures to higher-paying work separately from other exits.
How a MHRM 6701 Week 9 example is structured
The objection opens the memo in its strongest form, attributed to no one in particular, because the course expects the author to raise the hardest problem unprompted. A factual test follows and decides whether the objection has force: the plant's internal ladder is short, so the tension is real, which the memo admits instead of arguing it away. Carroll enters to explain why the objection matters to a sponsor: an ethical commitment that erodes the economic base will not last, and one that ignores mobility will not meet the program's social change expectation. The reply then works on both sides of the tension at once. Lengthening the ladder lets staying count as mobility; separate reporting stops a good social outcome from being logged as a staffing failure. Its last paragraph concedes what the reply cannot fix, the plant's wage position against the regional market.
The objection, unprompted
Keeping referred hires serves the plant; their advancing elsewhere serves the social claim. The memo raises this itself in the first paragraph, at the strength a skeptical director would use.
Is the tension real here?
Two rungs above production and few openings a year: the plant's own ladder confirms the problem. The memo reports that rather than asserting the two aims align.
Carroll's foundation
Economic responsibility supports the layers above it in Carroll's pyramid. The memo uses that image to show why a social commitment the plant cannot afford would not survive, and why ignoring mobility would hollow the claim.
Two changes, one on each side
A posted path into maintenance with paid training, and exits to higher-paying work recorded apart from other departures. Each change addresses one side of the tension without pretending the other away.
What remains unsolved
Overnight production pay sits low in the regional range, and neither change moves it. The memo names that limit and leaves it for the strategy paper.
Where marks go in MHRM 6701 Week 9
The heaviest weight falls on whether the memo lets the objection land. Memos that state the tension and then dissolve it in a sentence, asserting that engaged workers stay and prosper, have skipped the test this week exists for. The factual check against the plant's own ladder is credited heavily, because it turns an abstract worry into something a sponsor could verify. Carroll earns when the pyramid explains why the tension matters; a paragraph describing all four layers without applying them earns little. Each proposed change is read for which side of the tension it serves. The reporting rule is a small idea that graders tend to reward, since it changes what counts as success. Claiming that both aims are fully met, when the memo's own evidence shows a short ladder, spends the credibility the earlier sections built.
Get a MHRM 6701 Week 9 example written to your instructions
Hand over the objection memo prompt and rubric, and name the objection if your instructor or a classmate supplied one. The memo raises it at full strength, tests it against the scenario's facts and proposes changes on both sides, arriving in 24 to 48 hours with the first free. The plant's pay ladder and its maintenance openings are fictional.
MHRM 6701 Week 9 questions, answered
What is Carroll's pyramid?
Archie Carroll's model of corporate social responsibility arranges a company's responsibilities in four layers: economic at the base, then legal, ethical and philanthropic. The image implies that the upper layers rest on the lower ones. The sample uses it for that single point, that a social commitment undermining the economic base will not last, and does not treat the pyramid as a ranking of importance.
Should the memo conclude that the tension is resolved?
Only if the evidence shows it. The sample's evidence shows a short internal ladder, so it proposes changes that ease the tension and admits what remains, chiefly the plant's low overnight pay. Your memo earns more for an honest partial answer than for a claim of harmony the facts cannot carry, since the week asks whether both aims can hold at once.
Where does the objection come from if nobody raised it?
From the author. The course expects you to find the strongest problem with your own position before a reader does. The sample derives its objection from two claims made earlier in the term, the case for a stable crew and the promise of rising earnings, by asking what each needs the referred workers to do. Where those needs differ, an objection is waiting to be written.