MGMT 8910M Week 7 Revision Pass Example

Course	MGMT 8910M Dissertation Development Process
Week	Week 7
Paper type	Revision pass
Length	About 590 words, 5 pages
Format	APA 7 student paper
School	Walden University
Program	PhD in Management
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for MGMT 8910M Week 7

One Paragraph, Rewritten and Traced Downstream: A Revision Pass on the Sampling Section of a Dissertation About How Independent Pharmacy Owners Handle Reimbursement Disputes, Setting the Original Beside the Rewrite, Giving Each Change a Reason and Listing Every Passage It Touches

Student Name

Walden University

MGMT 8910M: Dissertation Development Process

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the paragraph revised and the three parts of the pass: side-by-side texts, reasons and the downstream list.

The Two Versions

Table 1

Original and Revised Sampling Paragraph

Original	Rewrite
Twelve pharmacy owners will be recruited through the state pharmacy association.	[1] Twelve owners of independent community pharmacies will be recruited through the state pharmacy association's member list.
(No criteria stated.)	[2] Each owner must meet three criteria: the pharmacy is independently owned, not part of a chain or franchise; it has operated for at least five years; and it has had a documented dispute with a pharmacy benefit manager over reimbursement or an audit recoupment in the past two years.
(No rationale stated.)	[3] These criteria select owners who are, in Patton's term, information-rich: people who have recently been through the decision the study asks about and can describe it in detail.
(No mention of location.)	[4] The sample will include both rural and urban pharmacies, about half of each, because reimbursement pressures may differ where a pharmacy is the only one in a town.
(No mention of exclusions.)	[5] Chain and franchise pharmacies are excluded. Their owners or managers usually do not negotiate or dispute reimbursement themselves, so including them would add accounts of a different decision. The design gives up any comparison between independent and chain pharmacies.

Bracketed numbers mark each difference between the two versions; reasons for each follow.

What this page is doingThe original and the rewrite sit side by side, with numbered markers, so a reader sees each change in place before reading why it was made.

Reasons for Each Change

1. "Independent community pharmacies" replaces "pharmacy owners" so the population matches the problem statement, which concerns independent owners.

2. The criteria are stated because the original gave the reader no way to know who would qualify. Each criterion follows from the research question: how owners decide whether to contest a reimbursement decision.

3. The rationale names purposeful sampling. Patton (2015) describes it as selecting cases that yield the most insight into the question, rather than cases that represent a population statistically.

4. Location is included because rural pharmacies serve as the only access point in some towns, which may change how an owner weighs a dispute.

5. The exclusion is stated with what it costs, since Robinson (2014) argues that a sampling plan should make its boundaries and their consequences explicit.

Why the Criteria Matter

The original paragraph told the reader how owners would be found but not why these owners and not others. Without criteria, the sample could have included owners who had never disputed a reimbursement decision, whose accounts would say little about how such decisions are made. Palinkas et al. (2015) note that purposeful sampling requires the researcher to state the criteria that make participants suitable and to choose a strategy that fits the study's aim. The three criteria here, independence, five years of operation and a recent dispute, each narrow the sample to owners who have faced the decision in conditions the study cares about.

What this page is doingThe pass explains the logic of the criteria in prose, because a list of criteria without a reason reads as arbitrary to a committee.

Downstream List

Table 2

Passages Affected by the Rewrite

Passage	Change needed	Status
Chapter one, delimitations	Add the three criteria and the exclusion of chains	Updated
Appendix B, recruitment script	Add a screening question on disputes in the past two years	Updated
Chapter three, limitations	Add a sentence on what excluding chains gives up	Scheduled for the Week 9 pass
Chapter one, definitions	Define "reimbursement dispute" to include audit recoupments	Scheduled for the Week 9 pass

Updated means the change has been made in the current draft; scheduled means it is logged for the next revision pass.

References

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543

MGMT 8910M Week 7 instructions, in plain terms

Week 7 asks you to revise one paragraph thoroughly and trace the consequences. Choose a paragraph that matters to your design, such as sampling or data collection. Set the original and the rewrite side by side, marking each difference with a number. Beneath, give each numbered change a one-line reason. Then list every other passage in the dissertation that the rewrite affects, such as definitions, delimitations, appendices or limitations, and mark each one updated or scheduled for a later pass. Cite methods sources that justify the substantive changes. The pass should run two to three pages. Revise for content and logic, not only for style; a paragraph that reads better but says the same thing does not meet the assignment.

How the MGMT 8910M Week 7 example is put together

The pharmacy revision pass sets five original lines beside five rewritten ones in a table, the first four originals empty because the old paragraph never stated criteria, rationale, location or exclusions. Numbered reasons follow, tying the population term to the problem statement, the criteria to the research question, the rationale to Patton's purposeful sampling and the exclusion to Robinson's call for explicit boundaries. A prose section explains why criteria matter, citing Palinkas and colleagues. The downstream table lists four passages, two updated and two scheduled for the Week 9 pass, including a new screening question in the recruitment script and a definition of reimbursement dispute that covers audit recoupments.

Where the marks sit in the MGMT 8910M Week 7 rubric

A full downstream list matters a great deal here, because it proves the writer can see one paragraph's change binding others. A rewrite with no downstream entries almost always means the search was skipped. Graders check that every numbered change has a reason and that reasons connect to the research question or design. The rewrite should improve substance, for example by stating criteria and rationale, not only wording. Each cited source should justify a particular change. The side-by-side layout should make every difference visible. Passes that revise only style, that list no downstream effects, or that give reasons such as "clearer" without saying why fall into the middle range, as do rewrites that introduce new inconsistencies with other chapters.

MGMT 8910M Week 7 help from the desk

Choose a paragraph a committee member would scrutinize, often sampling, because it determines whose voices the study includes. Before rewriting, list what the paragraph should tell a reader: who, how many, why these people, from where and who is left out. Write the rewrite to answer each, then set the two versions side by side and number the differences. For the downstream list, search your document for the population term and any criteria you added; every match is a candidate. Mark each one updated or scheduled. Tutors can check with you whether your criteria follow from your question, and the pharmacy sampling pass above shows the two-column layout and its downstream table.

Get a MGMT 8910M Week 7 example written to your instructions

Include the Week 7 prompt and rubric, the returned passage in outline, and the comment that came back with it. A two-column pass with numbered reasons and a downstream list returns within 24-48h, and a first request is free. The pharmacy paragraph in it is a stand-in; the passage your chair returned is rewritten by you.

More MGMT 8910M papers and PhD in Management samples

MGMT 8910M Week 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MGMT 8910M Week 7 sample paper?

The pharmacy sampling revision pass, both tables included, is posted above.

What paragraph does the MGMT 8910M Week 7 sample revise?

The sampling section of a study of independent pharmacy owners and reimbursement disputes.

What are the three sampling criteria?

Independent ownership, at least five years in operation and a documented dispute in the past two years.

What does information-rich mean?

Patton's term for participants who can offer deep insight into the question because they have lived the decision.

Which passages does the rewrite affect?

The delimitations, the recruitment script, the limitations and the definition of a reimbursement dispute.