MGMT 8910M Week 2 Writing Plan Example

Dissertation Development Process Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MGMT 8910M Week 2 writing plan example schedules Weeks 3 through 11 for a dissertation on whether flexible scheduling reduces turnover intention among call-center agents at investor-owned electric utilities. Its page targets come from the author's measured pace, 11 pages in four weeks, rather than the five a week once hoped for. The table flags two rows that wait on others: committee comments and permission to survey unionized agents at a partner utility. Walden MGMT 8910M, Dissertation Development Process, expects PhD in Management students to plan for slippage, so the plan adds a two-sentence missed-week rule, leaves Week 9 empty as a buffer and draws on Buehler and colleagues, Silvia, and Locke and Latham.

CourseMGMT 8910M Dissertation Development Process
WeekWeek 2
Paper typeWriting plan
LengthAbout 580 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramPhD in Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MGMT 8910M Week 2

1

A Plan Set From the Pace I Actually Keep: A Writing Plan for a Dissertation on Schedule Flexibility and Turnover Intention Among Utility Call-Center Agents, With a Week-by-Week Table, Two Flagged Dependencies, a Missed-Week Rule and an Empty Buffer Week

Student Name

Walden University

MGMT 8910M: Dissertation Development Process

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the plan's governing choice, targets from real pace, and lists its four parts.
2

A Plan Set From the Pace I Actually Keep: A Writing Plan for a Dissertation on Schedule Flexibility and Turnover Intention Among Utility Call-Center Agents, With a Week-by-Week Table, Two Flagged Dependencies, a Missed-Week Rule and an Empty Buffer Week

The Pace Behind the Targets

Over the past four weeks I produced 11 pages of new draft text, an average of just under 3 pages a week, in four one-hour sessions each week. I had planned for 5 pages a week. The targets below are set at 3 pages a week, the pace I actually kept, not the pace I hoped for. Buehler et al. (1994) found that people predict their own completion times optimistically even when they remember that similar tasks ran late, so the plan uses the record, not the estimate.

The dissertation asks whether flexible scheduling options reduce turnover intention among call-center agents at investor-owned electric utilities.

What this page is doingThe plan states the author's measured pace first, because every page target in the table is derived from it.
3

The Schedule

Table 1

Writing Plan, Weeks 3 to 11

WeekTaskExpected outputCan proceed alone?
3Literature review: schedule flexibility and control over working time3 pagesYes
4Literature review: turnover intention and its antecedents3 pagesYes
5Literature review: history of utility call-center staffing3 pagesYes
6Revise problem and purpose after committee comments on the prospectus2 pages revisedNo: waits on committee comments
7Method chapter: survey design and measures3 pagesYes
8Method chapter: sampling and access at the partner utility3 pagesNo: waits on permission to survey agents
9Buffer weekNothing assignedYes
10Literature review: synthesis and gap3 pagesYes
11Assemble chapters two and three; list open itemsAssembled draftYes

Page targets equal the author's measured average of about three pages a week. Revision weeks carry lower targets because revision is slower per page.

The Dependency Note

Two rows depend on other people. Committee comments on the prospectus are expected by the end of Week 5, but the committee has not committed to a date. Permission to survey agents at the partner utility depends on its human resources office and its labor relations staff, since agents are represented by a union. Neither can be hurried by more writing. Each flagged row has an unflagged task that can replace it if the gate has not opened: Week 10's synthesis can move into Week 6, and Week 7's measures can be extended into Week 8.

The Missed-Week Rule

If I produce less than half a week's target, the shortfall moves into the buffer week and no later week's target changes. If I miss a second week before Week 9, the lowest-priority remaining task, the history of call-center staffing, is cut to one page and the plan is reset from that week forward.

What this page is doingThe rule is written as two if-then sentences, so there is no judgment call to make in a bad week.
4

Why the Buffer Is Empty

Week 9 has nothing assigned so that it can absorb one missed week or one late gate without pushing everything after it. Silvia (2007) argued that productive academic writers protect a regular schedule rather than waiting for free time; an empty week protects that schedule from the one or two weeks that always go wrong. Locke and Latham (2002) report that hard, specific goals raise performance, provided the person is committed and can see how the work is going; the weekly target is specific, the record of actual pages is the feedback, and setting the target at my real pace is meant to keep it challenging without making it a goal I have already shown I will not meet.

References

Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Silvia, P. J. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. American Psychological Association.

MGMT 8910M Week 2 instructions, in plain terms

For Week 2, produce a writing plan of two to three pages covering the rest of the term. Build a table with one row per week, giving the task, its expected output in pages and a flag showing whether it can proceed without anyone else. Set page targets from your actual pace over recent weeks and state that pace in the plan. Add a short note on each flagged dependency, naming what you will work on if the gate has not opened. Write a missed-week rule as two if-then sentences. Leave one week with nothing assigned as a buffer, and explain why. Cite research where it supports a choice, such as how you set targets or why you protect a schedule.

How this MGMT 8910M Week 2 example is built

The utility call-center plan states the measured pace first and sets targets at about three pages a week. The table runs from a literature subsection on schedule flexibility in Week 3 to assembling chapters two and three in Week 11, with committee comments flagged in Week 6, survey permission flagged in Week 8 and Week 9 empty. The dependency note names the unflagged tasks that can swap in for each gate. The missed-week rule moves shortfalls into the buffer and cuts the lowest-priority subsection on a second miss. A closing section uses Silvia on protected schedules and Locke and Latham on specific, challenging goals with feedback to explain the buffer and the targets.

Where the marks sit in the MGMT 8910M Week 2 rubric

The plan is judged mainly on realism. Targets set from a stated, measured pace earn credit; targets that reflect hope rather than record do not. The dependency flags should identify every task that waits on another person, with a substitute task for each. Graders look for a missed-week rule that removes the need for judgment in a bad week. A buffer week shows foresight, and explaining it earns more. Research should support specific planning choices rather than decorate the plan. Plans that list weeks without page targets, that ignore committee or access gates, or that leave no slack for the inevitable slipped week fall into the middle range, as do rules stated as intentions rather than conditions.

MGMT 8910M Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

Count your actual pages over the last three or four weeks before setting any target; use dated versions of your files to be exact. Divide by weeks and use that number. List every task that depends on someone else, such as committee feedback, site permission or data access, and flag it. For each, pick a task you could do instead. Write your missed-week rule in the form "If X, then Y," twice. Leave one week empty and resist filling it. Keep the plan to a page of table and a page of notes. If you would like help setting realistic targets, a tutor can look at your record with you, and the call-center plan above lays out each part.

Get a MGMT 8910M Week 2 example written to your instructions

Attach the Week 2 prompt and rubric and describe the chapters in front of you, plus anything that depends on someone else's approval. A dated plan with its dependency note and missed-week rule returns in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Its study is made up, so the weeks on your own calendar are still yours to fill.

More MGMT 8910M papers and PhD in Management samples

MGMT 8910M Week 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MGMT 8910M Week 2 sample paper?

Read the utility call-center writing plan above, schedule table and missed-week rule included.

How are targets set in the MGMT 8910M Week 2 sample?

From the author's measured pace of about three pages a week, not the hoped-for five.

Which rows are flagged as waiting?

Committee comments on the prospectus and permission to survey agents at the partner utility.

What is the missed-week rule?

A shortfall moves into the buffer week; a second miss cuts the lowest-priority task and resets the plan.

Why is Week 9 left empty?

To absorb one missed week or late gate without pushing every later task back.