| Course | MGMT 8910M Dissertation Development Process |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | Writing plan |
| Length | About 580 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | PhD in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGMT 8910M Week 2
A Plan Set From the Pace I Actually Keep: A Writing Plan for a Dissertation on Schedule Flexibility and Turnover Intention Among Utility Call-Center Agents, With a Week-by-Week Table, Two Flagged Dependencies, a Missed-Week Rule and an Empty Buffer Week
Student Name
Walden University
MGMT 8910M: Dissertation Development Process
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
A Plan Set From the Pace I Actually Keep: A Writing Plan for a Dissertation on Schedule Flexibility and Turnover Intention Among Utility Call-Center Agents, With a Week-by-Week Table, Two Flagged Dependencies, a Missed-Week Rule and an Empty Buffer Week
The Pace Behind the Targets
Over the past four weeks I produced 11 pages of new draft text, an average of just under 3 pages a week, in four one-hour sessions each week. I had planned for 5 pages a week. The targets below are set at 3 pages a week, the pace I actually kept, not the pace I hoped for. Buehler et al. (1994) found that people predict their own completion times optimistically even when they remember that similar tasks ran late, so the plan uses the record, not the estimate.
The dissertation asks whether flexible scheduling options reduce turnover intention among call-center agents at investor-owned electric utilities.
The Schedule
Table 1
Writing Plan, Weeks 3 to 11
| Week | Task | Expected output | Can proceed alone? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Literature review: schedule flexibility and control over working time | 3 pages | Yes |
| 4 | Literature review: turnover intention and its antecedents | 3 pages | Yes |
| 5 | Literature review: history of utility call-center staffing | 3 pages | Yes |
| 6 | Revise problem and purpose after committee comments on the prospectus | 2 pages revised | No: waits on committee comments |
| 7 | Method chapter: survey design and measures | 3 pages | Yes |
| 8 | Method chapter: sampling and access at the partner utility | 3 pages | No: waits on permission to survey agents |
| 9 | Buffer week | Nothing assigned | Yes |
| 10 | Literature review: synthesis and gap | 3 pages | Yes |
| 11 | Assemble chapters two and three; list open items | Assembled draft | Yes |
Page targets equal the author's measured average of about three pages a week. Revision weeks carry lower targets because revision is slower per page.
The Dependency Note
Two rows depend on other people. Committee comments on the prospectus are expected by the end of Week 5, but the committee has not committed to a date. Permission to survey agents at the partner utility depends on its human resources office and its labor relations staff, since agents are represented by a union. Neither can be hurried by more writing. Each flagged row has an unflagged task that can replace it if the gate has not opened: Week 10's synthesis can move into Week 6, and Week 7's measures can be extended into Week 8.
The Missed-Week Rule
If I produce less than half a week's target, the shortfall moves into the buffer week and no later week's target changes. If I miss a second week before Week 9, the lowest-priority remaining task, the history of call-center staffing, is cut to one page and the plan is reset from that week forward.
Why the Buffer Is Empty
Week 9 has nothing assigned so that it can absorb one missed week or one late gate without pushing everything after it. Silvia (2007) argued that productive academic writers protect a regular schedule rather than waiting for free time; an empty week protects that schedule from the one or two weeks that always go wrong. Locke and Latham (2002) report that hard, specific goals raise performance, provided the person is committed and can see how the work is going; the weekly target is specific, the record of actual pages is the feedback, and setting the target at my real pace is meant to keep it challenging without making it a goal I have already shown I will not meet.
References
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Silvia, P. J. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. American Psychological Association.
MGMT 8910M Week 2 instructions, in plain terms
For Week 2, produce a writing plan of two to three pages covering the rest of the term. Build a table with one row per week, giving the task, its expected output in pages and a flag showing whether it can proceed without anyone else. Set page targets from your actual pace over recent weeks and state that pace in the plan. Add a short note on each flagged dependency, naming what you will work on if the gate has not opened. Write a missed-week rule as two if-then sentences. Leave one week with nothing assigned as a buffer, and explain why. Cite research where it supports a choice, such as how you set targets or why you protect a schedule.
How this MGMT 8910M Week 2 example is built
The utility call-center plan states the measured pace first and sets targets at about three pages a week. The table runs from a literature subsection on schedule flexibility in Week 3 to assembling chapters two and three in Week 11, with committee comments flagged in Week 6, survey permission flagged in Week 8 and Week 9 empty. The dependency note names the unflagged tasks that can swap in for each gate. The missed-week rule moves shortfalls into the buffer and cuts the lowest-priority subsection on a second miss. A closing section uses Silvia on protected schedules and Locke and Latham on specific, challenging goals with feedback to explain the buffer and the targets.
Where the marks sit in the MGMT 8910M Week 2 rubric
The plan is judged mainly on realism. Targets set from a stated, measured pace earn credit; targets that reflect hope rather than record do not. The dependency flags should identify every task that waits on another person, with a substitute task for each. Graders look for a missed-week rule that removes the need for judgment in a bad week. A buffer week shows foresight, and explaining it earns more. Research should support specific planning choices rather than decorate the plan. Plans that list weeks without page targets, that ignore committee or access gates, or that leave no slack for the inevitable slipped week fall into the middle range, as do rules stated as intentions rather than conditions.
MGMT 8910M Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
Count your actual pages over the last three or four weeks before setting any target; use dated versions of your files to be exact. Divide by weeks and use that number. List every task that depends on someone else, such as committee feedback, site permission or data access, and flag it. For each, pick a task you could do instead. Write your missed-week rule in the form "If X, then Y," twice. Leave one week empty and resist filling it. Keep the plan to a page of table and a page of notes. If you would like help setting realistic targets, a tutor can look at your record with you, and the call-center plan above lays out each part.
Get a MGMT 8910M Week 2 example written to your instructions
Attach the Week 2 prompt and rubric and describe the chapters in front of you, plus anything that depends on someone else's approval. A dated plan with its dependency note and missed-week rule returns in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Its study is made up, so the weeks on your own calendar are still yours to fill.
More MGMT 8910M papers and PhD in Management samples
- MGMT 8910M Week 1: Discussion Post
- MGMT 8910M Week 3: Chapter Outline
- MGMT 8910M Week 4: Draft Section
- MGMT 8910M Week 5: Progress Memo
- MGMT 8910M Week 6: Feedback Log
- MGMT 8910M Week 7: Revision Pass
- MGMT 8910M Week 8: Reference Audit
- MGMT 8910M Week 9: Reader Test
- MGMT 8910M Week 10: Assembly Check
- MGMT 8910M Week 11: Forward Plan
- MGMT 8900M Week 2: Topic Memo
- MGMT 8825M Week 2: Principles Brief
- MGMT 8003M Week 2: Search Strategy Memo
- MGMT 8815M Week 2: Problem Framing Brief
MGMT 8910M Week 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MGMT 8910M Week 2 sample paper?
Read the utility call-center writing plan above, schedule table and missed-week rule included.
How are targets set in the MGMT 8910M Week 2 sample?
From the author's measured pace of about three pages a week, not the hoped-for five.
Which rows are flagged as waiting?
Committee comments on the prospectus and permission to survey agents at the partner utility.
What is the missed-week rule?
A shortfall moves into the buffer week; a second miss cuts the lowest-priority task and resets the plan.
Why is Week 9 left empty?
To absorb one missed week or late gate without pushing every later task back.