| Course | MGMT 8725M Human Resource Talent Management |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | Role definition |
| Length | About 790 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | PhD in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGMT 8725M Week 2
A Role Specification That Described the Last Three Holders: A Role Definition Sorting Every Requirement for a Grocery Distributor's Regional Operations Manager by Origin, Keeping What the Work Demands, Removing What Former Holders Left Behind and Pricing the Wider Door
Student Name
Walden University
MGMT 8725M: Human Resource Talent Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
A Role Specification That Described the Last Three Holders: A Role Definition Sorting Every Requirement for a Grocery Distributor's Regional Operations Manager by Origin, Keeping What the Work Demands, Removing What Former Holders Left Behind and Pricing the Wider Door
The Specification, Quoted Whole
Fenwick Markets' distribution division has three regional operations manager roles, each overseeing a distribution center of about 400 employees and the outbound fleet serving roughly 32 stores. The specification used for the last three appointments reads, in full: ten years of continuous service with Fenwick; a bachelor's degree in business or logistics; at least three years as a shift manager at the Macon distribution center; willingness to relocate on four weeks' notice; demonstrated ability to manage budgets above $20 million; experience leading a warehouse management system implementation; and strong communication skills.
The Origin of Each Requirement
[after]
A requirement counts as work-derived only if the role's actual duties, as recorded in the last two years of the role's job reviews and the regional managers' calendars, require it.
Table 1
Current Requirements for Regional Operations Manager, Sorted by Origin
| Requirement as written | Origin | Keep, rewrite or remove |
|---|---|---|
| Ten years of continuous Fenwick service | Profile of former holders | Remove |
| Bachelor's degree in business or logistics | Profile of former holders | Remove |
| Three years as shift manager at Macon | Profile of former holders | Rewrite as experience running a high-volume shift |
| Relocation on four weeks' notice | Profile of former holders | Remove; the role is site-based |
| Manages budgets above $20 million | The work itself | Keep, as accountability for a site budget |
| Led a warehouse system implementation | Profile of one former holder | Remove; implementations are rare |
| Strong communication skills | The work itself, stated vaguely | Rewrite as specific tasks |
A Test for Work-Derived Requirements
The test asks one question of each line: would someone without this attribute be unable to do the work the role now involves? The budget accountability passes, since each manager owns a site budget near $24 million. Running a high-volume shift passes in its rewritten form, since the role involves managing several shifts. Nothing in the role's duties requires a degree, a decade of tenure, a particular center or readiness to move.
Requirements That Describe Former Holders
Each removed requirement traces to a person. All three recent holders had ten or more years at Fenwick and had run shifts at Macon, the company's oldest and largest center. One led the 2019 warehouse system rollout, which was added to the specification the following year. The relocation requirement dates from a period when regional managers rotated among centers, a practice that ended in 2018. Schmidt and Hunter (1998), summarizing decades of selection research, found years of job experience a weak predictor of performance compared with work samples and structured interviews, and Sackett et al. (2022), revisiting those estimates, confirmed that structured interviews and job knowledge tests remain among the stronger predictors while many others had been overstated.
Characteristics, Not a Roster
Gallardo-Gallardo et al. (2013) distinguished treating talent as characteristics, abilities and commitments a role requires, from treating it as particular people already designated. Fenwick's old specification did the second while appearing to do the first: its requirements read like characteristics, but together they described the three people who had held the job.
The Rewritten Specification
Accountability for a site operating budget of about $24 million; experience running a distribution or production shift of at least 80 people; demonstrated ability to plan labor against volume forecasts; experience resolving safety incidents and leading an investigation; and the ability to run weekly performance reviews with shift managers and store operations leaders.
The Wider Door, Priced
Under the old specification, Fenwick's internal candidate pool for the role was seven people, all at Macon. Under the rewritten one, a review of current roles finds 31 internal candidates across the three centers, including shift managers with eight years or less of service and two transportation managers. Widening the door has a cost: assessing 31 candidates properly, with a structured interview and a scheduling exercise, would take about 90 hours of senior manager time per vacancy, against about 20 hours now. It also has a benefit: the last two vacancies stayed open an average of five months, during which a deputy covered the role.
What the Rewrite Does Not Settle
The rewritten specification widens the pool but does not decide who should get the role. That still depends on how the 31 candidates are assessed, and an assessment that quietly rewards Macon experience or long tenure would rebuild the old specification under a new name. The next step is therefore to design the structured interview and the scheduling exercise around the five rewritten requirements alone, and to check after the first appointment whether candidates from outside Macon were scored fairly against those requirements.
References
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013). What is the meaning of 'talent' in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040-2068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
MGMT 8725M Week 2 instructions, in plain terms
Week 2 asks you to define one role your organization struggles to fill, by what the work requires rather than by who has done it. Quote the current specification in full before judging it. Sort each requirement by origin, the work itself or the profile of past holders, and decide whether to keep, rewrite or remove it. Explain the test you used to decide that a requirement is work-derived. Rewrite the specification from the work alone. Then estimate how the change affects the candidate pool, and set its costs, such as assessment time, against its benefits. Cite selection research on what predicts performance and at least one source on how talent is defined. Expect around five pages including a requirements table.
How the MGMT 8725M Week 2 example is put together
The sample quotes Fenwick's seven-line specification for regional operations manager and places each line in a table by origin. A section sets out the test: could someone without this attribute do the work the role now involves? Only budget accountability and shift leadership pass. A section traces each removed line to former holders, including a warehouse system rollout added after one holder led it. Schmidt and Hunter's review and Sackett and colleagues' revision show that experience in years predicts performance weakly. Gallardo-Gallardo and colleagues' distinction between talent as characteristics and talent as particular people explains how the old specification disguised a roster. A rewritten five-part specification follows, and a closing section prices the wider pool in senior manager hours and adds what the rewrite leaves unsettled.
Where the marks sit in the MGMT 8725M Week 2 rubric
Most credit goes to the sorting itself: every requirement placed by origin, with a stated reason. Graders look for a test of work-derived requirements that another reader could apply and reach the same result. Requirements traced to named past holders, or to practices that have ended, show the analysis is grounded rather than assumed. Use of selection research should be accurate about what predicts performance and how strongly. The rewritten specification must follow from the sorting; adding new requirements without justification costs marks. Estimating the change in the pool, with costs and benefits stated in hours or money, distinguishes strong papers. Definitions that simply list desirable traits without examining where they came from score low, as do references that do not support their claims.
MGMT 8725M Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often criticize a specification without quoting it, which leaves the reader unable to check the critique. Copy it word for word first. For each line, ask when it was added and who held the role at the time; old job postings and promotion records help. Look at what the role actually involves day to day, using calendars or job reviews, and test each requirement against that record. Be careful with experience requirements, since the evidence on years of experience is weaker than many managers assume. When you estimate the new pool, count real people in feeder roles. A tutor can help you locate selection research and set up the requirements table, and the Fenwick definition above works through each step.
Get a MGMT 8725M Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the role your case centers on, or ask for a public posting to be chosen, with the Week 2 instructions and marking sheet attached. Within 24 to 48 hours the origin table, the rewritten specification and a population estimate come back, free on a first order. Any posting quoted is one already public.
More MGMT 8725M papers and PhD in Management samples
- MGMT 8725M Week 1: Discussion Post
- MGMT 8725M Week 3: Capability Audit
- MGMT 8725M Week 4: Supply Analysis
- MGMT 8725M Week 5: Sourcing Plan
- MGMT 8725M Week 6: Peer Reply
- MGMT 8725M Week 7: Selection Critique
- MGMT 8725M Week 8: Development Case
- MGMT 8725M Week 9: Retention Analysis
- MGMT 8725M Week 10: Succession Memo
- MGMT 8725M Week 11: Final Talent Paper
- MGMT 8705M Week 2: Construct Brief
- MGMT 8625M Week 2: Structure Diagnosis
- MGMT 8615M Week 2: Disclosure Critique
- MGMT 8003M Week 2: Search Strategy Memo
MGMT 8725M Week 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MGMT 8725M Week 2 sample paper?
The Fenwick regional operations manager role definition above is the complete Week 2 sample.
Which requirements does the sample remove?
Ten years of service, the degree requirement, relocation on short notice and leading a warehouse system implementation.
How does the sample decide a requirement is work-derived?
It asks whether someone without the attribute would be unable to do the work the role now involves.
How much does the candidate pool grow?
From seven internal candidates, all at one center, to thirty-one across three centers.
What does the wider pool cost?
About ninety hours of senior manager assessment time per vacancy, against twenty under the old specification.