A purpose statement of one paragraph, glossed element by element against the bounded problem, beside a rejected draft that drifted: DBAX 9101 asks for that in its sixth week. Searches like "dbax 9101 week 6 assignment example", "dbax9101 week 6 sample" and "dbax 9101 week 6 example" land here.
What a finished DBAX 9101 Week 6 purpose statement looks like
About two pages. The purpose statement sits at the top in a single paragraph, modeled on Creswell's scripted form: the intent of the study, its central phenomenon, the participants and the site. Here it reads as an intent to understand how owners of independent hotels under a hundred rooms decide how much of their inventory to release to online travel agencies, in two neighboring coastal counties. Beneath it, a gloss table takes each element and points to the problem sentence it answers. A second exhibit shows an earlier draft, struck through, that promised to identify strategies for increasing direct bookings, and a paragraph explains why that draft failed: the problem concerns an allocation decision, and a purpose aimed at marketing tactics would have produced a different study.
How a DBAX 9101 Week 6 example is structured
The statement leads, unadorned, because it is the sentence later chapters will be checked against. The gloss follows as a table of four rows, one per element, each quoting the words of the problem sentence that justify it. Anything in the purpose with no matching words in the problem is flagged, and here nothing is flagged, as the exercise intends. A section on the verb comes next: understand, describe, examine and determine each commit the study to a different kind of answer, and the paragraph explains why understand is held for now and what would change it once a design is chosen. The rejected draft then appears with its fault named. The closing paragraph lists the future sections the purpose will govern, the question, the framework and the significance claims among them, so a reader knows where to test it.
The statement, alone at the top
One paragraph naming intent, phenomenon, participants and site. Nothing precedes it on the page, because every later section of Stage 1 will be read against its wording, and a reader should meet that wording first.
Every element traced to the problem
The gloss quotes the problem sentence beside each part of the purpose. Owners, independent hotels under a hundred rooms, the allocation decision and the two counties all appear in both, so nothing in the purpose arrives from nowhere.
A verb held provisionally
Understand, examine and determine promise different answers, and the choice among them belongs partly to the design. The statement uses understand, says why, and names the design decision that could replace it in the next stage.
The draft that drifted
A struck-through version aimed at strategies for direct bookings sits below, labeled with its fault. Marketing tactics answer a different problem from inventory allocation, and the exhibit shows how quietly a purpose can change subjects.
What the purpose will govern
The question, the framework and the significance claims each have to stay inside the statement. Listing them now gives later readers a checklist, and gives the author a reason to reopen the purpose if any of them strains against it.
Where marks go in DBAX 9101 Week 6
Alignment between purpose and problem is the substance of the grade. A purpose statement that reads well but introduces a population, outcome or setting absent from the problem sentence has changed the study without saying so, and graders read the two side by side precisely to catch that. The gloss table earns credit because it makes the check visible instead of leaving it to the reader. Verb choice is judged next: a purpose to determine causes, attached to a problem that describes an unexplained decision, promises a kind of answer the study is unlikely to deliver. The rejected draft counts for more than its size implies, because a drift shown beside its correction is the kind of judgment the week is testing. Long purpose statements that restate the significance argument lose focus and some credit.
Get a DBAX 9101 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Share the Week 6 instructions and rubric, your current problem sentence, and any purpose draft already written. A glossed purpose statement for a parallel problem, with a struck draft and a note on the verb, comes back in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Tracing it against your own problem sentence is the check only you can run.
DBAX 9101 Week 6 questions, answered
Should the purpose statement name the research design?
Creswell's scripts include it, and many templates ask for it. At Stage 1 the design is often unsettled, so the example names the intended approach tentatively and flags it for the next stage. What the statement must not do is choose a verb that commits to a design the problem cannot support, such as determining causes of a decision nobody has yet described.
How long should a purpose statement be?
Usually a short paragraph, often three or four sentences. The first carries the purpose itself; the others define the central phenomenon, name the population and setting, or state the intended contribution briefly. Longer statements tend to absorb material from the significance argument, which blurs the one sentence a reader needs to find quickly. If your template sets a length, follow it.
What if the purpose no longer fits the problem after revision?
Then one of them has to move, and the document says which. A purpose that outgrows its problem usually means the author has found a more interesting study, which is fine if the problem and evidence are rewritten to match. Keeping an old problem with a new purpose produces exactly the mismatch the gloss table is designed to expose.