| Course | DBAX 9101 Business Research Project Stage 1 |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 6 |
| Paper type | Purpose statement |
| Length | About 760 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBAX 9101 Week 6
The Sentence Every Other Section Must Obey: A Purpose Statement for a Multiple Case Study of How Small Specialty Subcontractors in Central Ohio Manage Late Payment, Tested Against the Problem It Answers
Student Name
Walden University
DBAX 9101: Business Research Project Stage 1
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Sentence Every Other Section Must Obey: A Purpose Statement for a Multiple Case Study of How Small Specialty Subcontractors in Central Ohio Manage Late Payment, Tested Against the Problem It Answers
The Problem the Purpose Must Answer
The general business problem is that late payment from general contractors strains the cash flow of small specialty trade subcontractors, which can force them to cut investment or close. The specific business problem is that some owners of small specialty trade subcontracting firms lack strategies to manage late payment from general contractors. Every element of the purpose statement must trace back to these two sentences.
The Purpose Statement
This qualitative multiple case study's purpose is to explore the strategies owners of small specialty trade subcontracting firms employ to withstand late payment from general contractors. The targeted population consists of owners of four mechanical, plumbing or electrical subcontracting firms in central Ohio, each with fewer than 50 employees and at least five years in business, who have managed periods of late payment without closing or defaulting on obligations. The implications for positive social change include preserving skilled trade jobs in local communities by helping small firms survive payment delays.
Testing the Statement Against the Problem
Table 1
Alignment of Purpose With Problem
| Element of the purpose | Traces to | Check | |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative multiple case study | Specific problem asks what strategies exist, not how much they matter | Aligned; a "what" question about practice suits exploration | |
| Explore strategies | "Lack strategies" in the specific problem | Aligned; same key word | |
| Owners | Owners named in the specific problem | Aligned | |
| Small specialty trade subcontracting firms | Population in both problem statements | Aligned | |
| Late payment from general contractors | Named in both problem statements | Aligned | |
| Four firms in central Ohio, fewer than 50 employees, five years | Boundaries from Week 4 | Aligned | |
| Managed delays without closing | Implies successful strategies exist to study | Aligned; matches "some owners lack" by studying those who do not | |
| Job preservation | Significance argument from Week 5 | Aligned | |
Each row was checked by reading the purpose element and the problem statement side by side.
Where the Problem Statement Gets Its Support
The two problem sentences are not my own invention. Peters et al. (2019) document how late payment travels down the construction contracting chain and lands on the firms with the least cash, which supports the general problem. Murfin and Njoroge (2015) show that when large buyers stretch their payments, the small suppliers carrying that credit end up investing less, which supports the claim that delay strains small firms rather than merely inconveniencing them. The specific problem, that some owners lack strategies, rests on the absence of research on owners' practices identified in Week 3.
Why a Multiple Case Study
Yin (2018) recommends case study research for how and why questions about current events a researcher cannot control, especially where the setting is part of what explains them. Strategies for managing late payment are embedded in each firm's relationships with its general contractors, its bank and its own workforce; separating them from that context would lose much of what explains them. Studying four firms rather than one allows comparison: strategies that appear in several firms are more likely to be transferable than those found in only one.
What the Statement Rules Out
The statement commits the study to a qualitative design, so it will not estimate how much any strategy reduces failure. It commits the study to owners, so the views of bookkeepers, project managers and general contractors will enter only through documents or as context. And it commits the study to successful firms, so it cannot compare them with firms that failed. Each of these limits follows from the purpose and will need to appear in the limitations section.
Revisions Made While Drafting
The first draft said "describe" rather than "explore," which suggested a study that catalogs practices without examining how owners chose them. The second draft named "small businesses," which drifted from the problem's specific population. A third draft named five firms; I reduced the number to four after considering what I could study in depth while working full time. Each revision brought the purpose closer to the problem.
Checking With Others
Before finalizing the statement, I will send it with the two problem sentences to my chair and ask one question: does anything in the purpose fail to trace back to the problem? Alignment errors are easier for a reader to see than for the author, who knows what each phrase was meant to say and reads that meaning into it.
References
Murfin, J., & Njoroge, K. (2015). The implicit costs of trade credit borrowing by large firms. Review of Financial Studies, 28(1), 112-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu051
Peters, E., Subar, K., & Martin, H. (2019). Late payment and nonpayment within the construction industry: Causes, effects, and solutions. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(3), Article 04519013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000314
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Reading the DBAX 9101 Week 6 instructions
Week 6 asks you to write your purpose statement and test it against your problem. Restate the general and specific business problems first. Write the purpose statement in the format your program expects, naming the design, the purpose verb, the population, the location and the implications for social change. In a table, trace each element of the purpose back to the problem and mark whether it aligns. Show where the problem sentences get their support. Justify the design briefly. State what the purpose rules out. Record any revisions you made while drafting and why. Close with a plan to have your chair or a peer check alignment before the statement is final.
Inside the DBAX 9101 Week 6 example
The paper restates both problem sentences. The purpose statement names a qualitative multiple case study, four owners in central Ohio and job preservation as social change. A table traces eight elements to the problem. A section shows support for the problem from Peters and colleagues and Murfin and Njoroge. A section justifies a multiple case design with Yin. A section states that the design excludes measurement of effect size, nonowner views and failed firms. A section records changes from describe to explore, from small businesses to the specific population and from five firms to four. A closing section plans to ask the chair one question about alignment. The alignment table gives a one-word verdict for each row so the chair can scan it.
DBAX 9101 Week 6 rubric: what earns full marks
Alignment is the core of this assignment, and the table tracing each purpose element to the problem carries the most weight. A purpose statement that repeats the problem's key terms exactly shows control. A brief, cited justification of design demonstrates methodological awareness. Stating what the purpose rules out shows that the author understands its commitments. A record of revisions shows reflective drafting. Inviting the chair to check alignment shows professionalism. Statements that change terms between problem and purpose, name a design without justification or set a population the study cannot reach will need revision before the proposal can advance. Purpose statements in this program follow a set pattern, and departures from it, such as omitting the location or the social change sentence, are flagged by reviewers quickly.
Common DBAX 9101 Week 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Put your specific business problem and your draft purpose side by side and underline the key terms in each. Every underlined term in the purpose should appear in the problem, and the reverse. If the problem says owners and the purpose says leaders, fix it now. Check that your purpose verb fits your design: explore suits qualitative work, examine suits quantitative. Count the participants you can actually reach. Many students write a purpose that drifts from the problem by a single word, which committees notice at once. Others promise a design they have not justified. Keep a list of changes as you draft. Line-by-line alignment checks are tedious alone, and our writers can work through yours with you.
Get a DBAX 9101 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Share the Week 6 instructions and rubric, your current problem sentence, and any purpose draft already written. A glossed purpose statement for a parallel problem, with a struck draft and a note on the verb, comes back in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Tracing it against your own problem sentence is the check only you can run.
More DBAX 9101 papers and DBA samples
- DBAX 9101 Week 1: Topic to Problem Discussion
- DBAX 9101 Week 2: Problem Candidates Comparison
- DBAX 9101 Week 3: Problem Evidence Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 4: Study Boundary Statement
- DBAX 9101 Week 5: Significance Argument Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 7: Research Question Draft
- DBAX 9101 Week 8: Framework Fit Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 9: Study Feasibility Sketch
- DBAX 9101 Week 10: Stage 1 Peer Critique
- DBAX 9101 Week 11: Assembled Stage 1 Document
- DBAX 8151 Week 6: Organizational Problem Statement
- DBAX 8101 Week 6: Second Pass Revision
- DBAX 8006 Week 6: Buyback Counterargument
DBAX 9101 Week 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBAX 9101 Week 6 sample paper?
The purpose statement, with its alignment table, is reproduced below for everyone at no charge.
What design does the DBAX 9101 Week 6 purpose name?
A qualitative multiple case study.
Who is the targeted population?
Owners of four small mechanical, plumbing or electrical subcontractors in central Ohio.
How is alignment tested?
Each element of the purpose is traced to the problem in a table.
What revisions were made?
Describe became explore, the population was narrowed and five firms became four.