| Course | DBAX 9101 Business Research Project Stage 1 |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 1 |
| Paper type | Opening discussion |
| Length | About 550 words, 3 pages |
| Format | Discussion post, APA 7 citations |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBAX 9101 Week 1
Week 1 Discussion: From Topic to Business Problem
Waiting Ninety Days for a Check: Turning a Topic Into a Business Problem, From Construction Payment in General to What Small Subcontractors Lack When General Contractors Pay Late
My Topic
My topic is late payment in construction. For twelve years I have worked as an estimator for a mechanical subcontractor in central Ohio, and I have watched invoices for completed work sit unpaid for sixty, ninety and sometimes 120 days while our firm paid its own workers and suppliers on time. I find the subject interesting, and I could read about it for months. That is exactly why I need to be careful: interest makes a topic, not a problem.
From Topic to Problem
A business problem, as I understand this week's reading, is something that costs someone, that the people affected cannot yet solve and that research could help with. My first attempt at a problem: small specialty trade subcontractors, such as plumbing, electrical and mechanical firms, often wait far longer to be paid than their contracts say, and some fail as a result. Peters et al. (2019) review the causes of late payment in U.S. construction, including pay-when-paid clauses and disputes over changes, and describe how delays pass down the contracting chain to the firms with the least cash.
That statement names a cost, but not yet what is missing. A sharper version: some owners of small subcontracting firms have no reliable way to handle slow-paying general contractors, while others in the same market survive it. The difference between those two groups is something a study could examine.
Where I Am Unsure
I am not sure yet whether the problem is a lack of strategies or a lack of bargaining power that no strategy can fix. Murfin and Njoroge (2015) found that small suppliers paid slowly by large customers cut their own investment, which suggests the cost is real, but it does not show that small firms can do anything about it. Petersen and Rajan (1997) found that firms with better access to bank credit tend to extend more trade credit to their customers, which hints that a subcontractor's own banking relationships may decide how long it can afford to wait.
Who Would Use the Answer
The people who would act on a study like this are owners of small mechanical, plumbing and electrical firms, along with the bankers and surety agents who decide how much risk those owners can carry. If a study found that surviving firms shared a handful of habits, such as checking a general contractor's payment record before bidding or negotiating shorter terms up front, other owners could adopt them without waiting for the law to change. That practical audience is what makes this a business problem rather than an interest.
Question for Classmates
Where in your own topic is the line between what interests you and what is costing someone money right now?
Reply to Keisha
Keisha, your topic of employee wellness programs is broad. Who, specifically, is losing money or performance because those programs fail, and who would act on what you found?
Reply to Arturo
Arturo, you framed your problem as "the lack of research on family business succession." Is the gap in the literature, or in what owners know how to do? A DBA study usually needs the second.
References
Murfin, J., & Njoroge, K. (2015). The implicit costs of trade credit borrowing by large firms. Review of Financial Studies, 28(1), 112-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu051
Peters, E., Subar, K., & Martin, H. (2019). Late payment and nonpayment within the construction industry: Causes, effects, and solutions. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(3), Article 04519013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000314
Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1997). Trade credit: Theories and evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 10(3), 661-691. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.3.661
DBAX 9101 Week 1 instructions, in plain terms
Week 1 asks you to name your research topic and then show how it becomes a business problem. Explain the difference in your own words: a topic interests you, while a problem costs a definable group something that they cannot yet solve and that research could help with. Write a first version of the problem, then a sharper one that names who lacks what. Cite at least one source showing the cost is real. Say what you are still unsure about, since that uncertainty gives classmates something to respond to. Name who would use the answer. Close by asking classmates where their own line between interest and cost falls, and answer two of them with a question that pushes their framing toward a practical audience.
How this DBAX 9101 Week 1 example is built
The post names late payment in construction as the topic and admits that twelve years of watching it only makes it interesting. A section drafts a first problem, then sharpens it to owners who lack strategies while others in the same market survive, citing Peters and colleagues. A section voices doubt about whether the issue is strategy or bargaining power, citing Murfin and Njoroge and Petersen and Rajan. A short section names owners, bankers and surety agents as the people who would act on findings. A question invites classmates' views. One reply asks a classmate who is losing money from failed wellness programs; the other asks whether a family business gap lies in the literature or in owners' practice.
Where the marks sit in the DBAX 9101 Week 1 rubric
Faculty look first for a clear distinction between topic and problem, and for a problem that names a cost borne by a definable group. A sharpened version that states who lacks what earns the most weight, since the DBA problem statement grows from it. Citing evidence that the cost exists, not only that the topic is discussed, shows early scholarly habits. Naming a practical audience demonstrates that the work is applied. Admitting uncertainty is valued over false confidence. Replies are valued when they push a classmate toward a narrower, practice-facing framing. Posts that dwell on a topic yet never name a cost, frame the problem as a gap in the literature alone or offer replies that simply agree draw lower scores in this opening week.
Common DBAX 9101 Week 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Write your topic in a few words, then ask who loses money, time or performance because of it and what they cannot yet do about it. That answer is the start of your problem. Draft it, then cut it until it names a group and a missing capability. Look for one published source that shows the cost exists beyond your workplace. Many students begin with a gap in the literature, which a DBA committee will ask you to restate as a gap in practice. Others pick a topic so broad that no single study could touch it. Keep the post brief, and admit what remains unclear to you. Sharpening a first problem statement is easier with a second reader, and our writers can play that role.
Get a DBAX 9101 Week 1 example written to your instructions
Send the opening prompt with its rubric, the topic you keep coming back to, and the number of replies your section wants. A post cutting that topic down to a researchable problem, replies included, returns in 24-48h, and the first one is free. It settles on a neighboring problem, leaving the choice of your own untouched.
More DBAX 9101 papers and DBA samples
- DBAX 9101 Week 2: Problem Candidates Comparison
- DBAX 9101 Week 3: Problem Evidence Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 4: Study Boundary Statement
- DBAX 9101 Week 5: Significance Argument Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 6: Purpose Statement Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 7: Research Question Draft
- DBAX 9101 Week 8: Framework Fit Paper
- DBAX 9101 Week 9: Study Feasibility Sketch
- DBAX 9101 Week 10: Stage 1 Peer Critique
- DBAX 9101 Week 11: Assembled Stage 1 Document
- DBAX 8151 Week 1: Personal Leadership Theory Post
- DBAX 8101 Week 1: Project Status Discussion Post
- DBAX 8006 Week 1: Currency Test Discussion Post
DBAX 9101 Week 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBAX 9101 Week 1 sample paper?
Read the whole post and its pair of replies below; nothing is charged.
What topic does the DBAX 9101 Week 1 post start from?
Late payment in construction, seen by an estimator at a mechanical subcontractor.
How is the problem sharpened?
To owners of small specialty subcontractors who lack strategies to manage late payment from general contractors.
What is the author unsure about?
Whether the issue is a lack of strategies or a lack of bargaining power.
Who would use the answer?
Owners of small trade firms, their bankers and surety agents.