Ownership assigned to roles, routines built into existing structures and RE-AIM maintenance defined: the substance of NURS 8600 Week 8's DNP sustainment handoff plan example for a fictional clinic. Searches like "nurs 8600 week 8 assignment example", "nurs8600 week 8 sample" and "nurs 8600 week 8 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 8600 Week 8 DNP sustainment handoff plan looks like
The plan opens by listing, in one paragraph, what is being handed over: the rooming screen, the scripted brief intervention, the provider option on phone-coverage days and the counselor introduction. An ownership table follows, assigning each element to a role: the nurse manager for the workflow overall, the lead medical assistant for rooming, the record-system analyst for the monthly report. Routines are described next, with the report reviewed at an existing monthly staff meeting, the workflow added to new-staff orientation and fidelity reviews reduced to a quarterly sample. A section on warning signs defines what would indicate decline, such as screening documentation falling below the baseline median for consecutive months, and the response each would trigger. RE-AIM frames maintenance at the setting level. A closing page lists open risks, including medical assistant turnover and a planned record-system upgrade.
How a NURS 8600 Week 8 example is structured
The handover summary comes first so every later section refers to a fixed list of elements; a sustainability plan that is vague about what is being sustained cannot assign it. Ownership precedes routines because a routine without an owner is only a hope. Routines are placed inside existing structures, the staff meeting and orientation, rather than new ones, and the reasoning is given: new meetings rarely outlast the person who created them. Warning signs use the same run chart logic the evaluation used, which lets the clinic apply the author's method without the author. RE-AIM appears after the practical sections so the framework organizes the definition of success instead of dictating the plan's shape. Open risks close the document, since a sustainment plan claiming no risks invites the reader to supply them.
What is being handed over
Four workflow elements listed plainly, so the plan and its readers agree on exactly what the clinic is keeping.
Owners by role
Nurse manager, lead medical assistant and analyst each own a named element, with backup roles identified for absences.
Routines that already exist
The monthly staff meeting, new-staff orientation and a quarterly fidelity sample carry the work without new structures.
Signs of decline
Run chart signals below the baseline median trigger a defined response, from a huddle reminder to a refresher session.
Maintenance and open risks
RE-AIM's maintenance dimension frames setting-level success, and turnover and a system upgrade are named as threats.
Where marks go in NURS 8600 Week 8
Practicality is the deciding quality. Faculty read sustainment plans asking whether the clinic could actually carry them out, and plans depending on new committees, extra staff or the author's continued involvement are marked as unrealistic. Ownership assignments are checked for specificity, because assigning sustainment to the team diffuses responsibility until nobody holds it. Integration with existing routines is weighed favorably. Warning signs earn credit when they are measurable and linked to responses; signs described as staff losing enthusiasm are difficult to detect and harder to act on. RE-AIM is judged by whether maintenance is defined in terms the clinic can observe. Open risks are an expected element, and omitting a foreseeable one, such as turnover in the role performing the screen, suggests the plan was written for an ideal clinic rather than this one.
Get a NURS 8600 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Send the sustainability prompt and rubric along with a summary of your implemented workflow, and a handoff plan assigning each element to a role comes back in 24-48h, the first free. The nurse manager and analyst shown are invented roles in an invented clinic, so the owners in your plan are the positions your practice setting actually has.
NURS 8600 Week 8 questions, answered
Can the sustainment plan assign ongoing work to the author?
Only if you will genuinely remain in the practice setting in a role that includes that work, and even then most faculty prefer ownership held by a position rather than a person. The example assumes the author's involvement ends. A plan under which the workflow would continue unchanged if you left the organization tomorrow is the stronger one.
Is RE-AIM required for a sustainment plan?
Not necessarily. The example uses RE-AIM's maintenance dimension because it offers a clear definition of setting-level continuation. Your program may prefer another framework or none at all. If your evaluation plan already used a framework with a sustainability component, reusing it here keeps your documents consistent, which is something reviewers tend to notice.
How detailed should warning signs be?
Specific enough for a successor to spot them in data the clinic will still collect. The example uses run chart signals against the baseline median because the analyst's monthly report produces those figures. Warning signs in your plan should rely on data that will exist after your project ends, not on reviews only you were conducting.