NURS 8210 · Week 8

NURS 8210 Week 8 technology business case example

Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Executives rarely reject a technology because it is a bad idea; they reject cases that hide the cost or cannot say what success would look like. The business case below proposes virtual nursing for the medical-surgical units of a composite health network and accounts for its full cost, from cameras and licensing to the remote nurses themselves, before declaring the measures that would justify a second phase.

What this page holds

Written for an executive team, the NURS 8210 Week 8 technology business case example weighs a virtual nursing program by total cost, expected benefit and declared measures, then recommends phasing. Searches like "nurs 8210 week 8 assignment example", "nurs8210 week 8 sample" and "nurs 8210 week 8 example" land here.

What a finished NURS 8210 Week 8 technology business case looks like

Nine pages with an executive summary on the first and a cost model in an appendix. Request, recommendation and decision date all fit in that summary, in under a page. Pressures on the composite system are described in organizational terms, admission and discharge workload concentrated on bedside nurses and a less experienced workforce, citing workforce literature rather than inventing local figures. Three options are compared: status quo, a two-unit pilot, and system-wide rollout. The cost model lists every category of total cost of ownership, including hardware, room retrofits, licensing, integration with the record, virtual nurse salaries, training and ongoing support, with values left for finance to supply and a sensitivity layout identifying the assumptions most likely to change the answer. Benefits are separated into measurable and strategic. Measures, risks and stop criteria close the case.

How a NURS 8210 Week 8 example is structured

The case is built for a reader who may read only the first page, so the executive summary carries the whole argument in miniature and each later section expands one of its sentences. Options are presented before costs because a cost model means little until the options it prices have been laid out, and the status quo is costed too, since doing nothing has its own expense in turnover and overtime. A comparison table holds every option to the same criteria, which keeps the recommendation from looking predetermined. The measures section declares outcome, process and balancing measures separately, with the data source for each, and names the result at which the pilot stops. Risks are paired with owners and mitigations. The appendix holds the cost model so the body can stay readable while finance checks the arithmetic.

One page for the executive team

Request, recommendation, cost range to be confirmed by finance, and a decision date, all on one page. An executive could act on it without reading further.

Three options, one table

Status quo, pilot and full rollout judged against identical criteria. Costing the status quo keeps the comparison honest.

Total cost of ownership, category by category

Hardware, retrofits, licensing, integration, staffing, training and support. Values are left for finance, but no category is left out.

Benefits sorted by how they can be shown

Measurable benefits get a data source; strategic ones, such as recruitment appeal, are labeled as such and not dressed up as returns.

Measures with a stop point

Outcome, process and balancing measures, each tied to a data source, and the pilot result at which the program halts before expansion.

Risks with owners

Camera acceptance by patients, bedside nurse skepticism and integration delays, each assigned to a role with a mitigation.

Where marks go in NURS 8210 Week 8

An executive should be able to decide on this document, and the grade follows from whether one could. Cost completeness is checked first: a case that prices the software and forgets integration, retrofits or the virtual nurses' salaries has understated the investment, and doctoral rubrics treat that as an analytic failure rather than an oversight. Declared measures are the second pillar, especially the stop point, which signals that the author is proposing an evaluable decision rather than advocating a purchase. Options analysis earns when the status quo is costed honestly. Benefits claimed without a source or a method lose ground quickly. The executive summary is judged on its own, as executives would read it. Evidence should come from peer-reviewed implementation and economic evaluation literature.

Get a NURS 8210 Week 8 example written to your instructions

Send the technology your section assigned or a technology under consideration at work, described in general terms, with the prompt and rubric. A custom business case is ready in 24-48h, first free, with the cost model as a spreadsheet whose categories stay fixed while your finance team supplies the numbers.

NURS 8210 Week 8 questions, answered

Why does the cost model leave the values blank?

Because invented prices for a composite system would be fiction presented as analysis, and doctoral readers spot that immediately. The model's value lies in its completeness and structure, every category named and every assumption flagged, so an actual finance team could populate it. If a prompt insists on illustrative figures, they appear clearly labeled as hypothetical, with the source of each estimate stated.

Is virtual nursing supported by strong evidence?

The published evidence is still early, and the business case says so rather than overstating it. That candor is part of why the recommendation is a pilot with stop criteria instead of a system-wide purchase. Where evidence is limited, a well-designed pilot becomes the organization's way of generating its own, which the case presents as a benefit of phasing.

Can the business case be written for a technology other than virtual nursing?

Yes; the structure is technology-neutral. Executive summary, options, total cost, benefits by type, declared measures and risks apply equally to a nurse call upgrade, a clinical communication platform or a predictive analytics license. What changes are the cost categories and the measures, both of which follow from the problem the technology is meant to solve, not from the vendor's feature list.