NURS 6002 Week 11 Philosophy and Goals Revision Example

Perspectives on Graduate Study Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 6002 Week 11 philosophy and goals revision example revises two earlier pieces, the philosophy of nursing and the five-year goal statement, at the end of the term. Three influences shaped the revisions: course readings, new membership in a professional organization and three conversations with a nurse practitioner mentor. Each piece is shown in its original and revised form with sentence-level changes. Driscoll's reflective model, what, so what and now what, structures the analysis of what changed and why. A section names the belief the writer kept unchanged, that patients should be known as people, and appendices hold the full revised documents. Walden NURS 6002, Perspectives on Graduate Study, credits real MSN revision backed by specific reasons. Sources include Driscoll's 2007 model, the ANA Code of Ethics and the writer's own earlier assignments.

CourseNURS 6002 Perspectives on Graduate Study
WeekWeek 11
Paper typeRevision paper
LengthAbout 720 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing (MSN)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 6002 Week 11

1

Revising My Philosophy of Nursing and Five-Year Goals at the End of the Term

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 6002: Perspectives on Graduate Study

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingRevised sentences sit beside the originals, so the reader sees exactly what the term changed and what it left alone.
2

Revising My Philosophy of Nursing and Five-Year Goals at the End of the Term

Early in this course I wrote a philosophy of nursing and a five-year goal statement. This paper revises both. Three influences shaped the revisions: the course readings, my new membership in a professional organization, and three conversations with a nurse practitioner mentor I met through that organization. The reasoning follows the three reflective questions of Driscoll (2007): what happened, so what does it mean, and now what will I do.

Philosophy: Original and Revised

Table 1

Philosophy Sentences Before and After Revision

OriginalRevised
Nursing is caring for patients with skill and kindness.Nursing helps people live through illness on their own terms, joining technical safety with attention to the person.
Health means being free of disease as much as possible.Health is the capacity to live in a way the person values, which chronic illness narrows but does not erase.
The environment is the hospital room and its equipment.The environment includes the people, routines and community around the patient, and extends past discharge.
Patient refusal deserves respect.Kept unchanged.

Goals: Original and Revised

Table 2

Goal Statements Before and After Revision

OriginalRevised
Work as a nurse practitioner in primary care within five years.Within five years, practice as an FNP in a rural clinic, caring mainly for adults with chronic disease.
Lead a quality project in my first year of practice.Lead a quality project in year three, after a first year focused on learning the provider role.
Precept students as soon as possible.Kept, but moved to year five.

One goal narrowed and one moved later. The practice goal narrowed from primary care in general to rural chronic disease care. The quality project moved from year one to year three.

What this page is doingUnchanged sentences are marked as kept, which shows the revision was selective rather than a rewrite for its own sake.
3

What Changed

The philosophy changed mostly in its account of health and environment. My first draft treated health as the absence of disease and the environment as the hospital room, which is how a medical-surgical nurse sees the world from the bedside. The goals changed in focus and timing. My first draft named primary care in general and put a quality project in my first year.

So What

Two influences explain the changes. The course's readings on nursing's metaparadigm pushed me to define health and environment in terms that fit people living with chronic illness outside the hospital, which is where I intend to practice. My mentor, a nurse practitioner in a rural clinic, told me that her first year as a provider was consumed by learning to make decisions alone, and that she would not have been ready to lead improvement work until her third year. Her account moved the quality project later. Rural practices have been relying more and more on nurse practitioners (Barnes et al., 2018), and hearing one describe that work made my goal concrete enough to narrow.

These changes matter for my practice now, not only later. If health is the capacity to live as a person values, then my discharge teaching should start from what the patient wants to be able to do, and I have begun asking that question on my unit.

Now What

I will do three things differently. I will choose practicum placements in rural clinics wherever possible, to test the narrowed goal early. I will keep a short log of decisions I find hard as a nurse, as practice for the provider role my mentor described. And I will revisit both documents at the end of each program year, using the same three questions.

The Belief I Kept

One belief stands exactly as I first wrote it: patient refusal deserves respect. The term tested it. A reading on ethics asked whether respecting refusal can become an excuse for not trying to persuade, and in one shift this term I cared for a man whose refusal of dialysis troubled the whole team. What I concluded is that respecting refusal does not mean staying silent; it means making sure the person understands, then honoring what they decide. The ANA Code of Ethics supports that position by grounding nursing in respect for each person's dignity and right to self-determination (American Nurses Association, 2015). The belief held, so I kept it.

Appendices

Appendix A: Revised philosophy of nursing in full. Appendix B: Revised five-year goal statement in full. Both are attached to the submitted paper.

References

American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Nursesbooks.org.

Barnes, H., Richards, M. R., McHugh, M. D., & Martsolf, G. (2018). Rural and nonrural primary care physician practices increasingly rely on nurse practitioners. Health Affairs, 37(6), 908-914. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1158

Driscoll, J. (2007). Practising clinical supervision: A reflective approach for healthcare professionals (2nd ed.). Baillière Tindall Elsevier.

Reading the NURS 6002 Week 11 instructions

The final NURS 6002 week usually asks you to revise earlier work, such as your philosophy and goals, and reflect on the changes. You show original and revised versions, explain what influenced the changes, analyze them with a reflective model and note what stayed the same. Faculty credit real revision with specific reasons, not cosmetic edits. Cite the reflective model and influences in APA 7. Keeping parts unchanged is acceptable if explained. Earlier course assignments are the natural source material. Appendices can hold the full revised documents. NURS 6002 faculty want each revised sentence shown beside its original with the reason for the change. Name the three influences specifically.

How the NURS 6002 Week 11 example is put together

The revision opens with a short introduction naming the two source documents and the term's main influences: course readings, a new organization membership and conversations with a mentor. A two-column table follows for the philosophy, original sentences on the left and revised sentences on the right, with unchanged sentences marked as kept. A second table does the same for the goal statement, where one five-year goal has narrowed and another has moved later. After the tables, three reflective sections apply Driscoll's model: what changed, why it matters for the author's practice, and what the author will now do differently. A final paragraph defends the one belief left untouched, that patient refusal deserves respect, explaining that the term tested it and it held. Both revised documents appear in full in appendices.

NURS 6002 Week 11 rubric: what earns full marks

Real revision, backed by specific reasons, is what earns credit at the close. Cosmetic edits dressed up as growth score poorly, so the example shows sentence-level changes that alter meaning, a narrowed goal and a reframed belief, and ties each to a named influence from the term. Reflective depth is typically a separate row, and Driscoll's model supplies visible structure for it without turning the piece into a template exercise. The kept belief earns credit many revisions miss, because it demonstrates that change was evaluated rather than assumed. APA formatting of the tables and appendices matters in a final submission. Weak revisions claim transformation without showing edits, name the course itself as the influence, or revise goals so broadly that they commit to nothing.

NURS 6002 Week 11 help: mistakes that cost marks

Revision papers lose credit when edits are cosmetic, such as changing a few words. Show sentence-level changes with reasons. Another common gap is naming influences vaguely. Point to a reading, the organization and the mentor conversations. Writers also skip what stayed the same. Name it and explain why. Avoid summarizing the course. Use Driscoll's three questions. Keep original and revised versions side by side. Close with how the revised goals will guide the next term. Writers also forget to update goals to match the revised philosophy. Check that they fit. Another frequent slip is appendices that do not match the text. Compare them. Keep the reflection honest about what did not change.

Get a NURS 6002 Week 11 example written to your instructions

Send your original goal statement and philosophy, anything your instructor noted on them, and the Week 11 prompt and rubric. Both are revised against what this term actually changed for you. A first sample comes at no cost, returned within 24 to 48 hours with tables that show every edit beside the sentence it replaced.

More NURS 6002 papers and MSN samples

NURS 6002 Week 11 questions, answered

What is Driscoll's reflective model?

John Driscoll's model builds reflection on a short run of questions asking what occurred, why it matters and what follows, carrying an account from description through interpretation to a next action. Nursing programs teach it widely for that forward pull. The example uses the three questions as headings. Gibbs' reflective cycle is the other common choice, and a course that prefers it gets a revision organized on its stages.

Is it acceptable to keep parts of the original philosophy unchanged?

Yes, and the example argues that keeping something deliberately is a sign of mature reflection. Faculty generally want evidence that each part was reconsidered, not that everything changed. The key is explaining why a belief survived the term. Your revision can keep as much of your original as genuinely still holds, provided each kept section is defended briefly.

Can the revision draw on NURS 6002 assignments from earlier weeks?

It should. The strongest revisions trace changes to specific work, such as the ethics commitment or the membership case, instead of to the term as a whole. The example cites its own earlier weeks as influences. Your previous submissions can be referenced directly if you share them, which makes the account of change concrete and easy for your instructor to follow.

Where can I find a free NURS 6002 Week 11 sample paper?

The philosophy and goals revision is reproduced here with original and revised versions, Driscoll's three questions and the belief kept.

What shaped the revisions in NURS 6002 Week 11?

Course readings, new membership in a professional organization and three conversations with a mentor.