Revised against the term, NURS 6002 Week 11's philosophy and goals revision example sets earlier sentences beside their replacements, reasons through Driscoll's model, and keeps one belief unchanged on purpose. Searches like "nurs 6002 week 11 assignment example", "nurs6002 week 11 sample" and "nurs 6002 week 11 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 6002 Week 11 philosophy and goals revision looks like
The revision opens with a short introduction naming the two source documents and the term's main influences: course readings, a new organization membership and conversations with a mentor. A two-column table follows for the philosophy, original sentences on the left and revised sentences on the right, with unchanged sentences marked as kept. A second table does the same for the goal statement, where one five-year goal has narrowed and another has moved later. After the tables, three reflective sections apply Driscoll's model: what changed, why it matters for the author's practice, and what the author will now do differently. A final paragraph defends the one belief left untouched, that patient refusal deserves respect, explaining that the term tested it and it held. Both revised documents appear in full in appendices.
How a NURS 6002 Week 11 example is structured
Evidence of change comes before explanation of change, so the tables precede the reflection. A reader who sees the edits first can judge whether the reflective sections describe them accurately, which keeps the reflection honest. The philosophy table comes before the goals table because beliefs shape goals and the revised goals partly follow from the revised beliefs. Driscoll's three questions give the reflective sections their order, moving from description to meaning to action, and each question gets its own heading so the model is visibly applied rather than merely named. The paragraph on the unchanged belief is placed last on purpose: after so much revision, a deliberate decision to keep something shows judgment rather than a habit of changing everything. Appendices hold the clean revised documents, ready for use in later courses.
Two documents, three influences
The introduction names the goal statement and philosophy under revision and the readings, membership and mentoring conversations that shaped the changes.
Sentence-level tables
Originals and revisions sit side by side, and kept sentences are labeled. The reader sees precisely what moved and what stayed.
What, so what, now what
Driscoll's reflective model structures the discussion under three headings. Each change is described, interpreted for practice and turned into a next action.
The belief that held
Respect for patient refusal is kept word for word. The paragraph explains which part of the term tested it and why it survived.
Clean copies for later
Both revised documents appear in full as appendices, formatted in APA 7, so they can be carried into later MSN courses.
Where marks go in NURS 6002 Week 11
Real revision, backed by specific reasons, is what earns credit at the close. Cosmetic edits dressed up as growth score poorly, so the example shows sentence-level changes that alter meaning, a narrowed goal and a reframed belief, and ties each to a named influence from the term. Reflective depth is typically a separate row, and Driscoll's model supplies visible structure for it without turning the piece into a template exercise. The kept belief earns credit many revisions miss, because it demonstrates that change was evaluated rather than assumed. APA formatting of the tables and appendices matters in a final submission. Weak revisions claim transformation without showing edits, name the course itself as the influence, or revise goals so broadly that they commit to nothing.
Get a NURS 6002 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Send your original goal statement and philosophy, anything your instructor noted on them, and the Week 11 prompt and rubric. Both are revised against what this term actually changed for you. A first sample comes at no cost, returned within 24 to 48 hours with tables that show every edit beside the sentence it replaced.
NURS 6002 Week 11 questions, answered
What is Driscoll's reflective model?
John Driscoll's model builds reflection on a short run of questions asking what occurred, why it matters and what follows, carrying an account from description through interpretation to a next action. Nursing programs teach it widely for that forward pull. The example uses the three questions as headings. Gibbs' reflective cycle is the other common choice, and a course that prefers it gets a revision organized on its stages.
Is it acceptable to keep parts of the original philosophy unchanged?
Yes, and the example argues that keeping something deliberately is a sign of mature reflection. Faculty generally want evidence that each part was reconsidered, not that everything changed. The key is explaining why a belief survived the term. Your revision can keep as much of your original as genuinely still holds, provided each kept section is defended briefly.
Can the revision draw on NURS 6002 assignments from earlier weeks?
It should. The strongest revisions trace changes to specific work, such as the ethics commitment or the membership case, instead of to the term as a whole. The example cites its own earlier weeks as influences. Your previous submissions can be referenced directly if you share them, which makes the account of change concrete and easy for your instructor to follow.