NURS 3030 Week 7 Advocacy Plan Draft Example

Advocating for Diversity Equity and Inclusion in Healthcare Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 3030 Week 7 advocacy plan draft example addresses uncontrolled blood pressure among Black adults in a composite primary care practice with about 1,800 adults with diagnosed hypertension. The quality dashboard shows that a smaller share of Black patients than White patients have their most recent reading below 140/90, and the gap has not narrowed. Three sections are finished: the problem, the evidence, including trials of team-based care and home blood pressure monitoring, and the proposed action, a nurse-led home monitoring program with loaned cuffs. Two sections are outlined for later weeks, stakeholders and evaluation, so the draft's trajectory is clear. Walden NURS 3030, Advocating for Diversity Equity and Inclusion in Healthcare, reads RN to BSN draft weeks for trajectory as much as polish. Sources include the AHA/ACC hypertension guideline, the Target: BP initiative and Victor's barbershop trial.

CourseNURS 3030 Advocating for Diversity Equity and Inclusion in Healthcare
WeekWeek 7
Paper typeAdvocacy plan draft
LengthAbout 500 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 3030 Week 7

1

Advocacy Plan Draft: Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Among Black Adults in One Primary Care Panel

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 3030: Advocating for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title marks this as a draft on one issue in one panel. Three sections are finished and two are honest outlines, which is what a draft week asks for.
2

Advocacy Plan Draft: Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Among Black Adults in One Primary Care Panel

Section 1: Problem (Finished)

In a composite primary care practice with about 1,800 adults with diagnosed hypertension, the practice's quality dashboard shows that a smaller share of Black patients than White patients have their most recent blood pressure below 140/90, and the gap has not narrowed in 2 years. The pattern mirrors national data. In national surveys of U.S. adults, control among U.S. adults with hypertension improved through the 2000s and then fell from 53.8% in 2013-2014 to 43.7% in 2017-2018, and control was less likely among non-Hispanic Black adults than among non-Hispanic White adults (Muntner et al., 2020). The problem for this plan is narrow on purpose: Black adults in this panel whose last two clinic readings were above target.

Section 2: Evidence (Finished)

Two bodies of evidence support a change. The first is guideline evidence that blood pressure measured outside the office, by the patient at home, gives a better picture of control than clinic readings and supports treatment decisions, and that team-based care, including nurses and pharmacists, improves control (Whelton et al., 2018). The second is evidence that moving care closer to where people are can close the gap. In a cluster-randomized trial in Black-owned barbershops, Black men with uncontrolled hypertension whose barbers linked them to pharmacists who prescribed medication in the shop saw their systolic pressure fall by 27.0 mm Hg on average over 6 months, compared with 9.3 mm Hg with barber encouragement alone, and about 64% reached a pressure below 130/80 (Victor et al., 2018). The lesson for this practice is not to open a barbershop program, but that bringing measurement and medication adjustment to patients, rather than waiting for clinic visits, can produce large changes.

What this page is doingThe evidence is used to justify one design choice: moving measurement and adjustment closer to the patient. A draft that lists studies without saying what they justify would lose marks here.
3

Section 3: Proposed Action (Finished)

The plan asks for one change: a nurse-led home blood pressure program for patients in the problem group. Each patient receives a validated upper-arm home monitor on loan, is taught to record paired readings at breakfast and bedtime during the week before each call, and reports readings to a registered nurse by phone or portal every 2 weeks. Under a practice protocol signed by the medical director, the nurse sends averages above target to the patient's clinician with a request for medication review within 1 week, rather than waiting for the next routine visit.

Section 4: Stakeholders (Outline, to Be Completed in Week 9)

Patients in the problem group and their families; registered nurses who would run the calls; clinicians who would receive titration requests; the medical director who would sign the protocol; the practice manager who controls monitor purchasing; community partners, possibly local churches, for outreach.

Section 5: Evaluation (Outline, to Be Completed in Week 10)

Primary measure: the proportion of Black patients in the panel with controlled blood pressure, compared with White patients, at 6 and 12 months. Process measures: monitors issued, calls completed, titration requests acted on within 1 week. Balancing measure: nurse time per patient.

References

Muntner, P., Hardy, S. T., Fine, L. J., Jaeger, B. C., Wozniak, G., Levitan, E. B., & Colantonio, L. D. (2020). Trends in blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA, 324(12), 1190-1200. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.14545

Victor, R. G., Lynch, K., Li, N., Blyler, C., Muhammad, E., Handler, J., Brettler, J., Rashid, M., Hsu, B., Foxx-Drew, D., Moy, N., Reid, A. E., & Elashoff, R. M. (2018). A cluster-randomized trial of blood-pressure reduction in black barbershops. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(14), 1291-1301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1717250

Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Jr., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., MacLaughlin, E. J., Muntner, P., Ovbiagele, B., Smith, S. C., Jr., Spencer, C. C., Stafford, R. S., Taler, S. J., Thomas, R. J., Williams, K. A., Sr., . . . Wright, J. T., Jr. (2018). 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Hypertension, 71(6), e13-e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065

NURS 3030 Week 7 instructions, in plain terms

Week 7 of NURS 3030 usually asks for a draft of your advocacy plan with some sections complete and others outlined. You finish the problem, evidence and proposed action, and outline sections due in later weeks. Faculty read for trajectory as well as polish. Cite disparity data and intervention evidence in APA 7. Outlined sections should say what they will contain and when. The project can address any disparity approved by your instructor. Data can be composite if real clinic data cannot be shared. NURS 3030 faculty want the finished sections to be complete and the outlined ones to list their planned contents. State the measure behind the disparity. Tie the action to evidence. Name who the plan will reach first.

How the NURS 3030 Week 7 example is put together

The document is visibly a work in progress, and that visibility is part of its design. A title block names the issue and the intended audience, a clinic quality committee. The problem section defines the population, Black adults with diagnosed hypertension in one primary care panel, and the gap the author suspects, lower control rates than among white adults in the same panel, framed as a comparison the clinic can run with its own registry rather than as a number the author supplies. Evidence follows in a short synthesis. The action section proposes stratifying the control measure by race and adding a nurse-led follow-up contact for patients above target. Stakeholder and evaluation headings come after, each holding a bulleted outline and a note marking the week it will be completed.

Where the marks sit in the NURS 3030 Week 7 rubric

Instructors reading a draft week look for trajectory as much as polish, and the example makes its trajectory legible. Finished sections earn full credit on their own terms: the problem is narrow, the evidence is synthesized, the action is concrete enough to question. Outlined sections usually earn a smaller share for showing a plan, and bullets with a target week satisfy that share where blank headings would not. Feedback potential is quietly rewarded in many draft rubrics, because a draft that can be critiqued is more useful than one that is merely long. Losses cluster around three habits: drafts attempting every section thinly, problems described for all minority populations at once, and actions phrased as awareness campaigns that no committee could approve, fund or measure. Formatting counts even in a draft, and headings must match the final template.

NURS 3030 Week 7 help from the desk

Drafts lose credit when outlined sections are empty headings. Say what each will contain. Another common gap is evidence that does not support the specific action. Cite trials of the action you propose. Writers also state the disparity without a measure. Use the dashboard metric and its definition. Avoid proposing several actions at once. Pick one. Keep the numbers composite unless permission exists. Name the stakeholders you will analyze next. Close with the next step for Week 9. Writers also forget patient voice in the plan, such as asking what makes home monitoring hard. Include it. Another frequent slip is evidence from a very different setting with no comment on fit. Say why it applies.

Get a NURS 3030 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Pass along the Week 7 instructions, the rubric and a sentence on the issue your final project will carry; the sections your classroom expects this week get drafted and the rest outlined. No charge for the first sample, returned inside 24-48 hours, built so later weeks can extend it rather than rewrite it.

Request this week free All NURS 3030 weeks Finished samples

More NURS 3030 papers and BSN samples

NURS 3030 Week 7 questions, answered

Why are some sections only outlined in the example?

Because most sections assign this week as a draft and grade later weeks on development. A draft finishing everything early leaves nothing to revise and can read as rushed. The outlined sections show a plan, which many draft rubrics reward. If your prompt requires every section in full this week, a custom sample writes each of them out completely.

Can my advocacy project use a different disparity?

Yes. Blood pressure control is used here because clinics already track it, which makes the ask checkable. Diabetes control, cancer screening, vaccination uptake and pain management all support the same draft structure. An issue drawn from your own practice tends to hold up best, and a sample built to your prompt carries whichever disparity you name through problem, evidence and action.

Does the example describe a real clinic's data?

It does not. The panel is a composite, and the draft deliberately leaves the gap for the clinic's own registry to confirm rather than quoting figures. That keeps the example free of any organization's internal data. A sample written for you follows the same principle, keeping your setting generic and pointing to the measure rather than reproducing numbers you may not be free to share.

Where can I find a free NURS 3030 Week 7 sample paper?

The blood pressure advocacy draft is reproduced here with the finished problem, evidence and action sections and the outlined stakeholder and evaluation sections.

Which gap does the NURS 3030 Week 7 plan address?

Fewer Black than White patients in the practice have their latest blood pressure below 140/90, a gap that has not narrowed.