NURS 4106 Week 7 Cause-Linked Intervention Plan Example

Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 4106 Week 7 cause-linked intervention plan example answers the cause analysis of medication administration errors on a composite 28-bed medical unit, which found interruptions during the medication pass in 11 of 17 reviewed events: phone calls to the nurse, questions from colleagues and call lights. The intervention is a protected medication pass with a visible signal, rerouted phone calls and a no-interruption zone at the cabinet, each component tied to an identified cause. The first PDSA cycle is small on purpose, one hall on one shift for one week, with interruptions counted before and after. A section explains why this size: small tests learn fast and fail cheaply. Walden NURS 4106, Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, scores RN to BSN intervention plans on alignment with causes. Sources include Westbrook's study of interruptions and medication errors, the IHI Model for Improvement and research on no-interruption vests.

CourseNURS 4106 Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
WeekWeek 7
Paper typeIntervention plan
LengthAbout 530 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 4106 Week 7

1

Cause-Linked Intervention Plan: A Protected Medication Pass Tested on One Hall, One Shift, One PDSA Cycle

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 4106: Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title ties the intervention to its cause and states how small the first test is. Plans that jump from a cause analysis to a unit-wide change skip the step this week grades.
2

Cause-Linked Intervention Plan: A Protected Medication Pass Tested on One Hall, One Shift, One PDSA Cycle

The Link to the Cause Analysis

The project's cause analysis of medication administration errors on a composite 28-bed medical unit found that interruptions during the medication pass were the most frequent contributing factor, cited in 11 of 17 reviewed events: phone calls to the nurse, questions from colleagues, and call lights answered mid-pass. The intervention therefore targets interruptions and nothing broader. The link is supported by research: in an observational study of medication administrations in two hospitals, interruptions occurred in just over half of administrations, and each interruption was associated with about a 12.7% increase in clinical errors (Westbrook et al., 2010).

The Intervention

A protected medication pass has three parts. First, a visible signal: the nurse wears a bright vest while preparing and giving the 09:00 medications, which tells colleagues and visitors not to interrupt except for emergencies. Second, calls redirected: the unit clerk holds phone calls for the nurse and takes messages, and a designated "float" nurse answers call lights on that hall during the pass. Third, a quiet preparation space: medications are prepared at the dispensing cabinet with a sign asking others to wait. The evidence for such bundles is modest. A systematic review found weak evidence that interventions reduce interruption rates and very limited evidence that they reduce medication errors, largely because studies were uncontrolled and combined several changes at once (Raban & Westbrook, 2014). That weakness is the reason to test small before spreading.

What this page is doingThe evidence for the intervention is stated honestly as weak, and that weakness is used as the reason for a small test rather than hidden.
3

The First PDSA Cycle

Plan: test the protected pass for the 09:00 medication pass on the east hall, 14 beds, day shift only, for 2 weeks. Predict that interruptions per medication pass will fall by at least half and that nurses will find the vest acceptable. Assign the unit clerk and one float nurse, and brief the east hall staff and the physicians who round there (Langley et al., 2009).

Do: an observer from the unit's quality team shadows the 09:00 pass on 6 of the 10 days and counts interruptions per pass, recording the source of each. Nurses record any problem on a card.

Study: compare interruptions per pass during the test with a 1-week baseline observed the same way on the same hall. Review the cards for unintended effects, such as delayed responses to calls or physicians unable to reach a nurse.

Act: if interruptions fall and no serious problem appears, adapt and extend to the west hall for a second cycle; if interruptions do not fall, look at which sources persisted before changing anything else; if a new problem appears, fix it before spreading. Medication error rates are tracked but not used to judge this first cycle, because errors are too infrequent to change detectably in 2 weeks.

Why This Size

One hall, one shift, and one medication pass keep the test small enough to observe closely, cheap enough to stop, and fast enough to learn from before the next cycle. A unit-wide launch would make it impossible to tell whether the vest, the redirected calls, or simply the attention of the project was responsible for any change.

References

Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Raban, M. Z., & Westbrook, J. I. (2014). Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective? A systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(5), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118

Westbrook, J. I., Woods, A., Rob, M. I., Dunsmuir, W. T. M., & Day, R. O. (2010). Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65

NURS 4106 Week 7 instructions, in plain terms

The seventh NURS 4106 week usually asks for an intervention plan tied to an earlier cause analysis. You link each intervention component to a cause, describe the intervention concretely and plan a first PDSA cycle with scope, measures and timing. Faculty score alignment above all, so education for all staff with no link to a cause loses marks. Cite evidence and the Model for Improvement in APA 7. The first cycle should be small. Not every contributing factor needs a component, but the main ones should. Education can be part of a plan if it addresses a cause. NURS 4106 faculty want a short table linking each component to a cause. Define the first cycle's scope, measure and dates.

Inside the NURS 4106 Week 7 example

Three to four pages under template headings. A linkage table opens the section: each of three contributing factors from the earlier analysis sits in one column, and the intervention component answering it sits beside it. Interruptions by phone calls map to call redirection through the unit clerk; interruptions by colleagues map to a visible signal worn during the pass; interruptions at the dispensing cabinet map to a marked quiet zone. The narrative then describes the intervention in operational detail: who does what, when, and with what materials. A PDSA section lays out the first cycle around the Model for Improvement's aim, measure and change questions, covering the aim, the measure of success and the change itself. Evidence from the prior stage supports each component.

Where the marks sit in the NURS 4106 Week 7 rubric

Intervention rows are scored on alignment above all: does each part of the plan answer a cause identified earlier? Plans that propose education for all staff, unrelated to the specific factors found, tend to lose points even when well written. The sample's linkage table makes that alignment checkable at a glance. Feasibility is the next consideration, and a small first test with defined roles reads as realistic. PDSA structure is often scored element by element, and predictions in the Plan phase are a frequent gap in submissions. Evidence support matters, and carrying the appraised sources forward shows the project hanging together. Acknowledging an unaddressed cause demonstrates judgment. Clarity and template adherence cover the remaining rows, and a missing heading costs points even when its content appears somewhere else.

NURS 4106 Week 7 help from the desk

Intervention plans lose the most when they propose education for all staff without tying it to a cause. Link every component. Testing on the whole unit for a month is another common mistake. Start with one hall and one shift. Writers also skip baseline measurement. Count interruptions before. Avoid tools with no evidence. Cite interruption studies. Name who runs the cycle. Close with what result would lead to the next cycle. Writers also forget patients' needs during the protected pass, such as call lights. Plan who answers them. Another frequent slip is no plan for the second cycle. Sketch it.

Get a NURS 4106 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Include your cause analysis with the intervention template and rubric, since the plan has to answer the factors it found. The desk writes a custom intervention plan linked factor by factor, with a first PDSA cycle scaled to one unit. First one free, delivered in 24-48h, predictions already written into the Plan phase.

More NURS 4106 papers and BSN samples

NURS 4106 Week 7 questions, answered

Why is the first PDSA cycle so small?

Because the point of a first cycle is learning, not proof. Testing on one hall for one shift limits disruption, makes problems visible quickly, and lets the team adjust before spreading the change. The Model for Improvement treats small tests as the normal path to larger change. Plans that start with a hospital-wide rollout skip the testing logic that PDSA exists to provide.

Does every contributing factor need an intervention component?

Every factor the plan addresses needs one, and the plan should say which factors it leaves aside. The sample addresses three and names staffing as outside its scope. Trying to answer every factor produces an unfocused plan. Explaining why some are excluded, whether for feasibility or control, shows the prioritization instructors look for in this stage.

Is education ever a valid intervention?

Yes, when the cause analysis identified a knowledge gap. Education is weak against system causes like interruptions, because knowing about the problem does not stop the phone from ringing. The sample includes brief staff orientation to the new process as support rather than as the intervention itself. Rubrics tend to question plans in which education is the only component.

Where can I find a free NURS 4106 Week 7 sample paper?

The protected medication pass plan is printed here with each component linked to a cause and the one-hall, one-shift PDSA cycle.

What cause does the NURS 4106 Week 7 plan target?

Interruptions during the medication pass, found in 11 of 17 reviewed error events.