MRKT 4503 Week 4 Customer Listening Study Example

Strategic Services Marketing Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MRKT 4503 Week 4 listening study example sets out how a composite driving school could hear unhappy learners who never complain. Walden MRKT 4503 asks students to design ways of listening to customers, so the study starts from a complaint log with only 23 entries from about 1,400 learners and Voorhees, Brady and Horowitz's finding that silent dissatisfied customers are numerous and often leave. A first table lists five channels, from public reviews to a mystery booking, with what each hears, who it misses and what it takes to run. A second table codes a composite sample of forty comments against SERVQUAL's five dimensions, showing reliability as the most frequent concern. A closing section names who stays unheard, parents who never ride along among them. Services research supports the design, a typical BS in Business Administration exercise.

CourseMRKT 4503 Strategic Services Marketing
WeekWeek 4
Paper typeListening study
LengthAbout 780 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MRKT 4503 Week 4

1

Hearing the Learners Who Never Call: A Listening Study Setting Out Five Channels for a Driving School, Coding What Each Captures Against SERVQUAL's Five Dimensions and Naming Who Stays Unheard

Student Name

Walden University

MRKT 4503: Strategic Services Marketing

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the study's target, the unhappy buyers who leave without complaining.
2

Hearing the Learners Who Never Call: A Listening Study Setting Out Five Channels for a Driving School, Coding What Each Captures Against SERVQUAL's Five Dimensions and Naming Who Stays Unheard

The Problem of Silence

Unhappy learners at Steady Wheel Driving School rarely phone the office. They finish a package without comment, or stop halfway, and book a road test or more lessons elsewhere. The school's complaint log recorded only 23 complaints last year from roughly 1,400 learners, which almost certainly understates dissatisfaction. Voorhees et al. (2006) studied customers who experienced service problems and did not complain, and found that this silent group was large and that many of them reduced their patronage or switched providers anyway. The school needs ways of hearing them. This study sets out five listening channels, codes a composite sample of what each would capture and names who would still go unheard.

What this page is doingThe study opens with who it is trying to hear, because most dissatisfied service customers never complain.
3

Five Listening Channels

Table 1

Listening Channels for the School

ChannelWhat it hearsWho it missesWhat it takes to run |
Public reviews on search and map listingsStrong views, often at the end of a packageModerately unhappy learners who move on quietlyWeekly reading by a manager, about one hour |
Two-question text after each lessonImmediate reactions to a specific lessonLearners who ignore texts; parentsText tool already in booking system; one hour weekly to review |
Calls to learners who stopped before their package endedReasons for leavingLearners who will not answerAbout ten calls a month by an office manager |
Instructors' end-of-day notesWhat instructors noticed: nerves, missed practice, confusionWhat learners would not say to the instructorFive minutes per instructor per day |
Mystery booking by a colleague from another branchBooking, pickup and lesson experience as a new learner sees itLong-term experience across a packageOne booking per branch per quarter |

Composite school.

Coding a Sample

Parasuraman et al. (1988) built SERVQUAL on five dimensions, running from the look of facilities and staff (tangibles) through dependability, promptness and competence to individual care. A composite sample of forty comments, paraphrased from what each channel would plausibly capture in a month, was coded against them.

Table 2

Composite Sample of Forty Comments by SERVQUAL Dimension and Channel

DimensionReviewsLesson textsExit callsInstructor notesMystery bookingTotal |
Tangibles: cars, office210025 |
Reliability: on time, as promised4331112 |
Responsiveness: rescheduling, replies212027 |
Assurance: competence, calm, trust3223010 |
Empathy: understanding the learner112206 |

Composite and illustrative. Comments are paraphrased, not quotations from real customers.

What this page is doingA sample of comments is sorted under SERVQUAL's dimensions, so the school can see which aspects of service each channel reveals.
4

What the Coding Shows

Reliability is the most frequent concern across channels, chiefly late pickups and the gap between the six-lesson promise and readiness. Assurance comes next, centered on how calm and competent instructors seem in traffic. The two channels differ in what they reveal. Exit calls and instructor notes surface empathy concerns that reviews and texts rarely do: a learner who felt rushed, a parent who did not understand why extra lessons were suggested. The mystery booking is the only channel that captures the experience of booking and arranging a first pickup, where responsiveness and tangibles problems appear.

No single channel captures everything. Reviews favor strong views, texts favor immediate reactions and exit calls favor reasons for leaving. Run side by side, the channels fill one another's blind spots. Zeithaml et al. (2018) recommend a mix of listening methods for exactly this reason, since each samples a different group of customers at a different moment.

Who Is Still Unheard

Three groups remain largely unheard. Parents who pay but never ride along rarely receive the lesson texts and are not reached by exit calls, which go to learners. Adult learners who are embarrassed about learning late may not say what bothers them, even when asked. And learners who failed their road test at another testing center after leaving Steady Wheel are invisible to the school. The study recommends adding a short text to parents after the third and sixth lessons, which would reach the first group at little cost. The other two groups may stay partly unheard; the school should acknowledge that its picture is incomplete rather than treat silence as satisfaction.

Costs and First Steps

All five channels can run with existing staff and tools, at a total of about six hours a week across the three branches. The study recommends starting with the lesson texts and exit calls, which address the reliability and empathy concerns most directly, and adding the mystery booking at the end of the first quarter.

References

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., & Horowitz, D. M. (2006). A voice from the silent masses: An exploratory and comparative analysis of noncomplainers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 514-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306288762

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Reading the MRKT 4503 Week 4 instructions

Week 4 asks you to design a listening program for your organization. Explain why complaints alone understate dissatisfaction, using research on customers who do not complain. Propose several listening channels, and for each state what it would hear, which customers it would miss and what it would take to run. Code a sample of what the channels would capture against a recognized framework, such as SERVQUAL's dimensions, and explain what the coding shows about which channels reveal which concerns. Name the customers who would still go unheard and suggest a low-cost way to reach at least one group. Close with costs and a first step the organization could take this month.

How the MRKT 4503 Week 4 example is put together

The study opens with the thin complaint log and cites Voorhees and colleagues on noncomplainers. A table lists five listening channels with what each hears, misses and costs. A section introduces SERVQUAL, citing Parasuraman and colleagues, and a second table codes forty composite comments by dimension and channel. A section explains that reliability is the most frequent concern and that exit calls and instructor notes reveal empathy issues other channels miss, citing Zeithaml and colleagues. A section names three groups still unheard and proposes texts to parents. A final section estimates six hours a week and names a first step. Each channel's cost is stated in staff hours, which keeps the plan grounded.

Where the marks sit in the MRKT 4503 Week 4 rubric

Listening studies are evaluated on breadth and honesty. Explaining why complaints understate problems, with research, earns credit. Several channels with what each hears, misses and costs are weighted heavily. Coding a sample against a recognized framework shows analytical rigor. Interpreting the coding to show which channels reveal which concerns demonstrates insight. Naming who remains unheard, rather than claiming complete coverage, shows integrity. Costs and a first step make the plan practical. Studies that propose a single survey, ignore costs or treat silence as satisfaction tend to receive lower marks. Short, labeled tables help instructors follow the argument quickly, and marks reward that clarity. Proposing a first step for this month is also valued.

MRKT 4503 Week 4 help from the desk

List every way your organization currently hears from customers, then ask who never uses any of those routes. That group is your target. Propose channels that reach them, and for each be honest about who it still misses. Write down a handful of realistic comments each channel would pick up, then sort them by a framework such as SERVQUAL to see which concerns each channel surfaces. Students often propose a satisfaction survey alone, which reaches mostly satisfied customers. Another frequent gap is forgetting the cost in staff time. Name a first step you could start this month. If you are unsure how to code comments, our writers can work through a sample with you and show how to label each one.

Get a MRKT 4503 Week 4 example written to your instructions

Attach the Week 4 listening prompt to its rubric and send both; the study, channels and coded table included, returns in 24 to 48 hours, and the first is free. If your service has public reviews, point to where they sit so the coding draws on them. The fallback is a made-up school's composite comments.

More MRKT 4503 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MRKT 4503 Week 4 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MRKT 4503 Week 4 sample paper?

The listening study is printed below with both tables, free of charge.

Why does the MRKT 4503 Week 4 study start from silence?

The complaint log holds only 23 entries from about 1,400 learners.

Which five channels are proposed?

Public reviews, post-lesson texts, exit calls, instructor notes and a mystery booking.

Which SERVQUAL dimension appears most often?

Reliability, mainly late pickups and the gap between promise and readiness.

Who stays unheard?

Parents who never ride along, embarrassed adult learners and those who leave for another school.