| Course | MMHA 6540 Population Health Management Applications |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 1 |
| Paper type | Population scoping memo |
| Length | About 910 words, 5 pages |
| Format | Memo, APA 7 citations |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MMHA 6540 Week 1
Memorandum
To: Director of Population Health, Prairie Gate Health Plan
From: Population Health Analyst (MMHA student)
Date: Month Day, Year
Re: Scope for this year's population health initiative: members 65 and older in our three counties
Working Definition
For this initiative, population health management means five steps: define a group, identify its members from data the plan holds, sort them by need, offer each subgroup a program matched to that need, and measure results over time. The definition is deliberately practical. Population health, in the broad sense Kindig and Stoddart (2003) describe, concerns the outcomes of a whole group and how those outcomes are distributed within it. A health plan can influence only part of that picture, through its members and the services it pays for, so its population health work must start with a group it can identify and reach.
Scope
This memo proposes that the initiative focus on Prairie Gate's members aged 65 and older, most enrolled through the plan's Medicare Advantage product, in the three counties the plan serves. Table 1 shows the scope in round, illustrative figures.
Table 1
Residents and Plan Members Aged 65 and Older by County (Illustrative)
| County | Residents 65 and older | Prairie Gate members 65 and older | Members as share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindon (metro) | 58,000 | 14,000 | 24% |
| Ash (rural) | 18,000 | 3,500 | 19% |
| Corley (rural) | 14,000 | 2,500 | 18% |
| Total | 90,000 | 20,000 | 22% |
Resident counts are rounded from census estimates; member counts from the plan's enrollment file.
What the Scope Shows
Most members live in Lindon County, the metro county, but the two rural counties hold an older and more isolated share of the plan's members. In Ash and Corley, a larger proportion of members are over 80, more live alone, and clinics and hospitals are farther away. A program designed only around the metro county's services would miss the members likely to face the greatest barriers. The plan covers about one in five older residents in the three counties, so whatever it does will reach only part of the older population; partners serving all residents, such as the area agency on aging, will matter for both reach and design.
Why the Triple Aim Frames the Choice
The Triple Aim holds that health systems should chase three aims together rather than one at a time: healthier populations, better care as patients experience it, and lower cost per person (Berwick et al., 2008). Its strength is that it keeps cost from becoming the only goal or being ignored. For scoping, the third aim is the most useful constraint. Prairie Gate is paid a fixed amount per member each month, so per capita cost is not abstract: a program that improves health but raises costs per member beyond what the plan can sustain will not last. The initiative should therefore look for a need where better health and lower avoidable cost point in the same direction, such as a condition that causes expensive emergency visits and admissions that a program could prevent.
What Is In and Out of Scope
In scope: plan members aged 65 and older living in the three counties, including members in assisted living. Out of scope for this initiative: members living long term in nursing homes, whose care is organized differently and who are better served by the facilities' own programs; members under 65, including younger members with disabilities, who deserve their own initiative; and residents who are not plan members, though partners may serve them. These boundaries can be revisited after the first year.
Next Steps
If you agree with this scope, the next steps are to identify candidate needs for this population, profile the burden of the leading candidates using public and plan data, rank them against criteria agreed in advance, and assess which community partners are ready to help. I propose to bring a ranking to you within six weeks. Falls among older adults are a likely candidate, given their frequency and cost, but the ranking should be done before the plan commits to any single need. Medical spending on falls among older adults is substantial nationally (Florence et al., 2018), and much of it comes from emergency visits and admissions that a plan pays for directly, which is why falls fit the Triple Aim test described above.
Three other candidates should be profiled alongside falls so that the ranking is a real comparison: social isolation, which is common among older adults living alone and has measurable health effects (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2020); medication burden, since many older members take numerous prescriptions with risks of interactions and falls; and food insecurity, which the plan's care managers report in a growing share of assessments. Each candidate will be profiled with the same sources, so that differences reflect the needs rather than the data available.
Data and Partners the Initiative Will Need
Scoping already shows what the initiative will need. On the data side, the plan's claims and enrollment files identify members and their emergency visits and admissions; county emergency medical services agencies hold records of calls that never reach a hospital; and public sources such as state hospital discharge data and federal injury statistics describe the wider community. On the partner side, the area agency on aging serves all older residents and runs community programs; home repair and transportation nonprofits operate in the metro county and, more thinly, in the rural counties; and network primary care practices see most members at least once a year. The initiative's design will depend on which of these partners are ready to work with the plan, which is why a readiness assessment is part of the work plan.
References
Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
Florence, C. S., Bergen, G., Atherly, A., Burns, E., Stevens, J., & Drake, C. (2018). Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(4), 693-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15304
Kindig, D., & Stoddart, G. (2003). What is population health? American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 380-383. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.3.380
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25663
The Walden MMHA 6540 Week 1 instructions
Scoping memos at the start of a population health course ask you to define the group your initiative will serve before choosing what to do. Begin with a working definition of population health management in practical steps. Then show the population in numbers, separating the wider community from the people your organization can identify and reach, and break it down by place. Interpret the numbers: where are members concentrated, and where are they most vulnerable? Use a framework to narrow the choice, explaining which part of it constrains your decision most. State plainly what is in and out of scope. Close with the candidate needs you will compare, the data and partners the work will require, and the next steps with a timeline.
How the MMHA 6540 Week 1 example is put together
The memo opens with a five-step definition and cites Kindig and Stoddart. Table 1 sets residents and members aged 65 and older side by side for three counties. A section reads the table, noting rural members' older and more isolated profile and the plan's one-in-five share of older residents. A Triple Aim paragraph, citing Berwick and colleagues, uses cost per person to narrow the search to needs where health and avoidable spending align. A boundaries section lists inclusions and exclusions. Next steps name falls, isolation, medication burden and food insecurity, citing Florence and colleagues and the National Academies. A final section lists claims, ambulance and public data and the partners the work will need.
MMHA 6540 Week 1 rubric: what earns full marks
Scoping memos are judged first on precision about the population. A table that distinguishes the community from the organization's own members, broken down by place, earns the first block of credit. Interpretation that finds where need concentrates earns the next. Use of a framework to narrow choices is assessed for whether the student explains how it constrains the decision, rather than simply naming it. Clear inclusions and exclusions show discipline. Naming several candidate needs, rather than announcing an answer, demonstrates openness to evidence. Identifying data and partners early shows foresight. Memo format and concise paragraphs are expected. References placed where they support claims carry the final points.
MMHA 6540 Week 1 help: mistakes that cost marks
Scoping memos often jump straight to a favorite program. Hold back and define the group first. Separate the people your organization serves from the wider community, because you can act directly only on the first. Look at geography and age, since need is rarely spread evenly. Choose one framework and show how it narrows your options; the Triple Aim's cost goal does that well for plans paid per member. Write down who is out of scope and why. List more than one candidate need so the later ranking is real. Note the data and partners you will need. We can draft a scoping memo for a population your organization wants to serve.
Get a MMHA 6540 Week 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 1 prompt and rubric, and say whether your section assigns a community or a covered population; a scoping memo with a definition, a round-number table and named exclusions returns in 24-48h, and a first memo is free. Membership counts and county lines are illustrative; no such plan exists.
More MMHA 6540 papers and MHA samples
- MMHA 6540 Week 2: SDOH Lever Post
- MMHA 6540 Week 3: Falls Burden Profile
- MMHA 6540 Week 4: Need Ranking Matrix
- MMHA 6540 Week 5: Partner Readiness Map
- MMHA 6540 Week 6: Falls Intervention Blueprint
- MMHA 6540 Week 7: PMPM Staffing Budget
- MMHA 6540 Week 8: Payer ROI Brief
- MMHA 6540 Week 9: Baseline and Target Framework
- MMHA 6540 Week 10: Integrated Initiative Draft
- MMHA 6540 Week 11: Falls Prevention Plan
- MMHA 6530 Week 1: Prevention Tier Map
- MMHA 6520 Week 1: Information Flow Map
- MMHA 6501 Week 1: Adaptive-Technical Framing Brief
- MMHA 6475 Week 1: Program Lifecycle Post
MMHA 6540 Week 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MMHA 6540 Week 1 sample paper?
The scoping memo, county table included, is free to read on this page.
How does the MMHA 6540 Week 1 memo define population health management?
Define a group, identify it from plan data, sort by need, offer matched programs and measure results over time.
Whom does the initiative cover?
Plan members aged 65 and older across three counties, excluding nursing home residents and members under 65.
How does the Triple Aim narrow the scope?
Its cost-per-person goal points the plan toward needs where better health and lower avoidable spending coincide.
Which needs will be compared next?
Falls, social isolation, medication burden and food insecurity.