MMHA 6000 Week 2 Organizational Chart Analysis Example

Foundations of Healthcare Administration Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

An overloaded nursing executive and an infusion pump that needed three signatures are the two findings of this MMHA 6000 Week 2 organizational chart analysis example, which reads a composite 118-bed hospital's chart layer by layer. The chart is summarized as a figure and typed as a functional design with one service line. Reporting lines are traced from the board, spans of control are checked against the similarity of the units, and line functions are separated from staff functions. A stalled purchase shows where decisions climb two reporting lines. Walden MMHA 6000 asks for one structural change, and this paper moves outpatient infusion into the ambulatory service line and states what the new dotted line will cost. MHA students see a chart analyzed for how work moves, not just who reports to whom.

CourseMMHA 6000 Foundations of Healthcare Administration
WeekWeek 2
Paper typeOrganizational analysis paper
LengthAbout 1,070 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Healthcare Administration (MHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MMHA 6000 Week 2

1

Eleven Direct Reports and a Pump That Needs Three Signatures: Reading the Organizational Chart of Calder Ridge Community Hospital Layer by Layer

Student Name

Walden University

MMHA 6000: Foundations of Healthcare Administration

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe two details in the title, an overloaded span and a stalled purchase, are the chart's two main problems.
2

Eleven Direct Reports and a Pump That Needs Three Signatures: Reading the Organizational Chart of Calder Ridge Community Hospital Layer by Layer

The Chart and Its Type

Calder Ridge Community Hospital is a composite 118-bed independent nonprofit hospital with an employed medical group of eight clinics; the organization and its chart are invented for this analysis. Figure 1, summarized below, shows the chart as the hospital publishes it. A volunteer board of trustees sits at the top. The president and chief executive officer reports to the board. Six executives report to the chief executive: the chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief nursing officer, vice president of medical affairs, vice president of ambulatory services and vice president of human resources. Department directors report to these executives, and managers and front-line staff report to the directors.

Table 1

Figure 1 Summary: Executive Reporting Lines and Direct Reports

ExecutiveReports toDirect reportsMain units |
Chief operating officerChief executive7Imaging, laboratory, pharmacy, facilities, food service, environmental services, security |
Chief financial officerChief executive4Finance, revenue cycle, purchasing, information technology |
Chief nursing officerChief executive11Eight nursing units, emergency department, surgical services, outpatient infusion |
Vice president of medical affairsChief executive3Quality, medical staff office, hospitalist program |
Vice president of ambulatory servicesChief executive5Practice administrator, specialty clinics, urgent care, referral center, home care |
Vice president of human resourcesChief executive2Recruitment, benefits and payroll |

Figure 1 is described as a table; the published chart shows the same lines as boxes.

Most of the chart is functional: units are grouped by the kind of work they do, such as nursing, finance or facilities. Ambulatory services is the exception, grouped as a service line that holds everything needed to run outpatient care, from clinic staff to referral coordination. The hospital is therefore a hybrid, mainly functional with one service line. Functional designs build depth of expertise within each discipline, while service line designs make it easier to coordinate everything a patient group needs, and most hospitals mix the two (Burns et al., 2020).

Reporting Lines

Authority runs from the board to the chief executive, who is the only employee the board hires and evaluates. Below the chief executive, lines are mostly clean: each director has one executive. Two exceptions show up on close reading. The emergency department director reports to the chief nursing officer, but the emergency physicians are contracted through the vice president of medical affairs, so the department's two main groups of staff answer to different executives. And outpatient infusion sits under nursing, although the patients it serves are almost all referred from the medical group's oncology clinic, which sits under ambulatory services.

What this page is doingAuthority is traced from the board down in one pass, so every later stall can be located on the chart.
3

Spans of Control

Span of control means how many people answer directly to a single manager. No single number is correct; the right span depends on how similar the units are, how experienced their leaders are and how much coordination they need (Daft, 2021). Two spans on the chart look out of balance. The chief nursing officer has eleven direct reports, more than any other executive, and they are not similar units: inpatient nursing, emergency care, surgery and infusion each face different problems. Directors report that getting time with the chief nursing officer takes weeks. At the other end, the vice president of human resources has two direct reports, which suggests the role is more advisory than operational and could take on more.

Line and Staff Functions

Line functions deliver the hospital's core services: nursing, the emergency department, surgery, imaging, laboratory, pharmacy and the clinics. Staff functions support them: finance, human resources, information technology, purchasing and quality. The chart mixes the two under some executives. The chief operating officer manages both line units, such as imaging and laboratory, and support units, such as facilities and security. That arrangement is common in a hospital this size and keeps the number of executives down, but it means one person divides attention between patient-facing units and building maintenance. Staff functions also hold a quiet form of power over line units: purchasing, information technology and finance can delay a clinical request without ever saying no, simply by placing it in a queue. The pump purchase described next is an example.

Where Decisions Stall

One recent approval shows the cost of the current design. The outpatient infusion clinic asked for a second infusion pump model, at about $40,000 for a set, to reduce wait times for longer treatments. The request started with the infusion nurse manager, went to the chief nursing officer, who controls nursing equipment, then to the vice president of ambulatory services, because the oncology clinic depends on the infusion schedule, and finally to the chief financial officer's capital committee. It needed three executive signatures across two reporting lines and took four months. No one opposed it. It stalled because no single executive owned the outcome, and each waited for the others.

What this page is doingOne real approval path, the pump request, makes the chart's cost visible in a way span counts alone cannot.
4

One Structural Adjustment and Its Cost

The adjustment proposed is to move outpatient infusion from nursing to the ambulatory service line, with a dotted line back to the chief nursing officer for nursing practice standards. The infusion clinic would then share a vice president with the oncology clinic it serves, and requests like the pump purchase would need one operational signature rather than two. The chief nursing officer's span would also drop from eleven to ten.

Two other options were considered and set aside. Raising the infusion manager's purchasing limit would have sped up this one request but left the clinic's daily scheduling split between two executives. Creating a full cancer service line, with its own vice president, would solve the problem more completely, but the hospital sees too few oncology patients to support another executive salary.

The change has costs. Infusion nurses would report operationally to a vice president who is not a nurse, and the dotted line to nursing creates a small matrix, which can confuse staff about whose direction comes first. Galbraith (2002) notes that every structure solves some coordination problems by creating others, and that the choice is which problems the organization would rather manage. Here the trade is worth making, because coordination with oncology happens daily, while coordination with inpatient nursing on practice standards happens monthly. The dotted line will need a written agreement on who decides staffing, competencies and policy, or the clinic will have two managers instead of one.

What this page is doingThe paper proposes a single change and prices it, rather than redrawing the whole chart.
5

References

Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2020). Shortell and Kaluzny's health care management: Organization design and behavior (7th ed.). Cengage.

Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization theory and design (13th ed.). Cengage.

Galbraith, J. R. (2002). Designing organizations: An executive guide to strategy, structure, and process (New and rev. ed.). Jossey-Bass.

What the MMHA 6000 Week 2 instructions ask for

Organizational chart assignments ask students to analyze the structure of a health care organization, often their own or a published one. Prompts usually ask students to identify the structural type, trace reporting relationships, assess spans of control, distinguish line from staff functions and recommend a change. Instructors expect the chart itself to appear as a figure or a clear description. A strong analysis connects structure to how decisions are actually made. Expect four to six pages. Most prompts expect at least two scholarly or textbook sources on organization design. Instructors often accept a composite or published chart when students cannot share their employer's.

How the MMHA 6000 Week 2 example is put together

The paper summarizes the chart in a table of executives, direct reports and units, then names its type as a functional design with an ambulatory service line. A reporting section finds two places where lines cross: the emergency department and outpatient infusion. A span of control section compares the largest and smallest spans. A line and staff section notes the chief operating officer's mixed portfolio. A decision section follows one capital request through three executives over four months. The closing section proposes one change, sets aside two alternatives and names the cost of a dotted-line arrangement. The proposal also notes that the change reduces the nursing executive's span by one.

Reading the MMHA 6000 Week 2 rubric

Graders look for analysis rather than description. Naming the structural type with a reason, not a label, earns credit. Span of control should be judged against the kind of units involved, not a fixed number. Separating line from staff functions accurately is expected. The section most likely to lift a paper is a traced decision that shows the structure's cost in time. A recommendation that admits its own trade-off, rather than presenting a new chart as a fix, shows understanding that every structure creates some coordination problems. Noticing where reporting lines cross, such as a department whose staff answer to two executives, shows close reading of the chart.

Common MMHA 6000 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Get a current chart and redraw it if needed so that every box has one clear line upward. Count direct reports for each executive and ask whether the units under each are similar. Mark which units deliver care and which support it. Then pick one recent decision that took longer than it should have and trace each approval it needed. Propose one change and write down what it will make harder. Our writers can produce a custom sample analysis of a chart you provide if you want to see the method on your own organization. Keep the figure readable; a table of executives and direct reports works when a chart image would be too dense. Ask a director which approvals take longest; the answer usually points to the chart's weak spot.

Get a MMHA 6000 Week 2 example written to your instructions

An MMHA 6000 organizational chart analysis is kept here, a fictional hospital's figure read for spans, staff placement and stalled approvals. No real hospital's chart was redrawn to build it. Send the prompt and the rubric your section posted and the first custom sample comes back free inside 24-48h.

More MMHA 6000 papers and MHA samples

MMHA 6000 Week 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free MMHA 6000 Week 2 sample paper?

The full organizational chart analysis of a composite 118-bed hospital is on this page.

What structural type is the chart?

Mainly functional, with ambulatory services organized as a service line.

Which span of control is too wide?

The chief nursing officer's eleven direct reports, which cover very different units.

Where do decisions stall?

A $40,000 infusion pump request needed three executive signatures across two lines and took four months.

What change does the paper propose?

Moving outpatient infusion under ambulatory services, with a dotted line to nursing for practice standards.