This INHE 4001 search documentation logs databases, terms, filters, and result counts for the yoga question so that anyone can rerun the search exactly. Searches like "inhe 4001 week 3 assignment example", "inhe4001 week 3 sample" and "inhe 4001 week 3 example" land here.
What a finished INHE 4001 Week 3 search documentation looks like
The record is mostly tables, spread across three pages. A short paragraph opens it by restating the question and breaking it into three concept groups: the condition, the intervention, and the study designs sought. A term table lists each group's controlled vocabulary, such as the MeSH headings for yoga and low back pain, alongside free-text synonyms and truncated forms. A search log follows, one row per database: PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and AMED, which indexes complementary medicine. Each row gives the date, the exact search string, the filters applied for language, dates, and adult populations, and the count after each step. A closing paragraph explains which results were removed as duplicates or off-topic and states the final number carried into next week's table.
How a INHE 4001 Week 3 example is structured
Reproducibility is the organizing aim, and every part serves it. Concept groups come before terms because the groups determine how terms combine: synonyms within a group are joined with OR, and the groups are joined with AND. Controlled vocabulary and free text appear side by side, since relying on subject headings alone misses recent articles not yet indexed. The log records exact strings rather than descriptions of them, because a paraphrased search cannot be rerun. Filters are listed in the order applied, with a count after each, making visible which choice removed the most results. Every exclusion is accounted for by reason in the last paragraph. Nothing in the record evaluates study quality yet; screening for relevance is separated from appraisal, which begins with the evidence table.
Concept groups first
The question is split into condition, intervention, and design before any term is chosen. The groups tell the reader how the Boolean operators will combine everything that follows.
Headings and free text together
Subject headings catch well-indexed articles; free-text terms catch recent ones and those indexed inconsistently. Listing both shows the search was built to miss as little as possible.
Exact strings
Each database row reproduces the search string character for character. A description such as searched for yoga and back pain cannot be rerun by anyone else.
A count at every step
Result numbers after each filter show where the set shrank and why. A reader can then judge whether a filter was too aggressive.
Exclusions with reasons
Duplicates and off-topic results are counted and explained. The final number carried forward matches the log arithmetic exactly.
Where marks go in INHE 4001 Week 3
Reproducibility is weighted above coverage. A record that lists databases and a few keywords but omits exact strings, filters, or counts cannot be rerun, and it loses most of the documentation criterion regardless of how good the final set is. Fit between the search and the question comes next: the condition and intervention must both be represented, and any concept deliberately left out, such as the outcome, should be explained. Graders check Boolean logic for errors, such as groups joined with OR that should use AND. Database choice is read for relevance, and a search of a single general database draws comment. Points also drop for counts that do not add up, filters applied without explanation, and exclusions made on quality before appraisal has begun.
Get a INHE 4001 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Your search may need different databases, such as PsycINFO for a mind-body question or a nursing index your library licenses, and the record is built around the ones your course names. Send the prompt, rubric and your question; the record returns in 24-48h, with the first free. Note any required flow diagram.
INHE 4001 Week 3 questions, answered
Which databases, and how many?
Three or four is common for this course, chosen for fit with the question. A general biomedical database, a nursing or allied health index, and a source of systematic reviews make a sound core. For integrative practices, a database that indexes complementary medicine often turns up studies the others miss.
Do I need to report the number of results at each step?
Most rubrics expect it, because the counts are what make the search checkable. A final number alone hides where results were lost. Logging the count after each filter also helps you see whether a filter removed relevant studies, which is worth knowing before the evidence table is built.
Should I include a PRISMA flow diagram?
Include one if the prompt asks, and consider it even when optional for a larger search. A flow diagram summarizes identification, screening, and inclusion in a form graders recognize quickly. For a small search, a clear paragraph accounting for each exclusion can do the same work in less space.