INHE 1005 Week 3 Term Audit Example

Foundations of Integrative Health Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Eight everyday uses of "complementary" and "alternative" are ruled on in this INHE 1005 Week 3 term audit example, each against one criterion written before any usage was read: together with conventional care, or instead of it. Walden INHE 1005 sets this audit because the two words travel as one phrase in ordinary speech while meaning nearly opposite things in the course glossary. The table labels each usage, rules on it and gives a reason, overturning a friend's "alternative" peppermint oil as complementary and excluding a studio's free class. Two rulings are undecidable, a news headline and an insurance category, and each is defended at length. BS in Integrative Health students will see a fair audit hold to its criterion even when a ruling cannot be made.

CourseINHE 1005 Foundations of Integrative Health
WeekWeek 3
Paper typeTerm audit
LengthAbout 770 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Integrative Health
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for INHE 1005 Week 3

1

Together With or Instead Of: A Term Audit Ruling on Eight Everyday Uses of "Complementary" and "Alternative" Against One Criterion Set in Advance

Student Name

Walden University

INHE 1005: Foundations of Integrative Health

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe four words that open the title are the audit's whole criterion, which is why it can be applied to every usage the same way.
2

Together With or Instead Of: A Term Audit Ruling on Eight Everyday Uses of "Complementary" and "Alternative" Against One Criterion Set in Advance

The Criterion, Stated First

In everyday speech, "complementary and alternative" works as a single phrase. In the glossary used for this course, the two words mean nearly opposite things. The federal center's glossary labels a nonmainstream practice complementary if it accompanies conventional medicine and alternative if it substitutes for it (National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health [NCCIH], 2021). My criterion follows that distinction exactly: a usage is ruled complementary if the practice described runs together with conventional care, alternative if it replaces conventional care, and undecidable if the sentence does not say which. I wrote this criterion down before reading any of the eight usages, so that no ruling could shape it.

What this page is doingFixing the criterion before reading the evidence is the step that makes an audit fair.
3

The Eight Usages

The usages below were collected over one week from a hospital website, a supplement label, news coverage, a conversation, an insurance summary, a clinical note in a course case study, a fitness studio flyer and a textbook. Each is paraphrased, not quoted, and none is attributed to a named source.

Table 1

Usages, the label each used, and the ruling under the criterion

No.Usage, paraphrasedLabel usedRulingReason |
1A cancer center offers massage and music therapy to patients during chemotherapyComplementaryComplementaryPractice runs alongside chemotherapy |
2A supplement label calls its herbal blend a natural alternative to prescription sleep aidsAlternativeAlternativeProduct is presented as a replacement |
3A friend uses "alternative medicine," peppermint oil on her temples, while still taking her prescribed migraine drugAlternativeComplementaryUsed together with the prescription, whatever she calls it |
4A case-study note says a patient declined surgery to pursue alternative treatment for a breast lumpAlternativeAlternativeConventional care was declined |
5A news story reports rising use of "complementary and alternative medicine"BothUndecidableThe phrase joins the two and gives no use |
6An insurance summary lists chiropractic under "alternative treatments"AlternativeUndecidableThe label names a type of practice, not how it is used |
7A fitness studio offers a complementary first classComplementaryExcludedMeans free of charge; not a health use |
8A textbook chapter refers throughout to "CAM"BothComplementary in practiceChapter's examples all involve use with conventional care |

Rulings follow the criterion above; usage 7 is excluded because the word is used in an unrelated sense.

What this page is doingParaphrasing usages without naming sources keeps the audit about words, not about criticizing publishers.
4

The Two Undecidable Rulings

Usage 5 cannot be ruled because the phrase "complementary and alternative medicine" bundles the two meanings. A survey that counts "CAM use" counts people who use yoga alongside their medications and people who refuse chemotherapy for herbal remedies in one figure. The national center itself moved away from the bundled phrase, and its renamed title in 2014 replaced "alternative" with "integrative" (NCCIH, 2021). Calling usage 5 complementary because most such use is in fact combined with conventional care would be a guess about the population behind the headline, and the criterion asks about the sentence, not the population.

Usage 6 is undecidable for a different reason. The insurer uses "alternative" as a category of practice, chiropractic, not as a description of how a member uses it. A member who sees a chiropractor while also under a physician's care is using it as a complementary approach; a member who uses it instead of seeing a physician is using it as an alternative. The summary cannot tell which. National survey data show that chiropractic is one of the more commonly used approaches among U.S. adults (Nahin et al., 2024), so the ambiguity in insurance wording affects many people. I leave the ruling undecidable because forcing it would mean ruling on the member, not the words.

What this page is doingDefending each undecidable ruling at length shows the audit refused to force an answer the criterion could not give.
5

What the Audit Shows

Three of the eight speakers used a label that the criterion overturned or could not confirm. The most telling is usage 3, where the speaker called her practice alternative but used it in exactly the way the glossary calls complementary. Labels in everyday speech often describe how unfamiliar a practice seems rather than how it is used. More than vocabulary is at stake. Using a practice instead of conventional care can carry indirect risks, such as a delayed diagnosis, that come from the decision rather than from the practice itself (Wardle & Adams, 2014), which is why usage 4 is the one ruling in this audit with clear health consequences. For this course, the audit suggests a working rule: describe how a practice is used before naming it, and avoid the bundled phrase in my own writing.

References

Nahin, R. L., Rhee, A., & Stussman, B. (2024). Use of complementary health approaches overall and for pain management by US adults. JAMA, 331(7), 613-615. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.26775

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2021). Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: What's in a name? https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name

Wardle, J., & Adams, J. (2014). Indirect and non-health risks associated with complementary and alternative medicine use: An integrative review. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 6(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2014.01.001

The Walden INHE 1005 Week 3 instructions

Term audits in this course ask students to collect real uses of key terms and judge them against a definition. Prompts usually ask for a set number of usages from varied sources, a stated criterion, a ruling on each and an explanation of any that could not be ruled. Some ask students to reflect on what the audit reveals about how the terms are used outside the field. Instructors want to see that the criterion came first and was applied consistently. Audits that adjust the criterion to fit each example, or that skip hard cases, generally score lower than those that hold the line. Usages are often expected to come from different kinds of sources, such as websites, labels, conversations and coursework, so that the audit samples everyday language rather than a single genre.

How this INHE 1005 Week 3 example is built

The audit opens by stating its criterion and its source, noting that the criterion was fixed before reading any usage. Eight usages, paraphrased from varied everyday sources, appear in a table with the label each used, the ruling and the reason. One is excluded because it uses the word in an unrelated sense. Two sections defend the undecidable rulings: the bundled phrase in a news story and an insurer's practice category. A final section draws a lesson from the overturned labels and notes, with a source, that replacing conventional care carries indirect risks. Every usage is paraphrased and left unattributed, which keeps the audit focused on the words rather than on criticizing any publisher or person.

INHE 1005 Week 3 rubric: what earns full marks

Instructors usually check first that the criterion was stated before the evidence and applied the same way every time. Rulings with reasons earn a substantial share. Handling hard cases openly is where audits are separated: the two undecidable rulings here are defended at length rather than forced, and that earns credit. Excluding an unrelated sense of the word shows care with language. Accurate use of the federal center's definitions supports the criterion. The closing lesson, that everyday labels often describe unfamiliarity rather than use, shows the audit produced an insight. APA format and citation quality complete the evaluation. Paraphrasing instead of quoting named sources is also noticed, since it avoids turning a language exercise into a critique of particular organizations.

Common INHE 1005 Week 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Write your criterion down before you collect anything, and do not change it. Gather usages from different kinds of sources. For each, record the label the speaker used, your ruling and a one-line reason. When a usage cannot be ruled, explain exactly why instead of guessing. Leave out uses of the word in unrelated senses, and say so. If your rulings keep shifting as you go, we can prepare a sample audit with your collected usages. Paraphrase usages rather than quoting named sources, unless your prompt asks for citations to them.

Get a INHE 1005 Week 3 example written to your instructions

Forward the audit prompt, the number of items your section wants and any source list it names, and a completed audit in this shape comes back. First custom piece is free, turned around in 24 to 48 hours. If the assignment wants usages gathered at a site you work for, that collecting stays yours.

Request this week free All INHE 1005 weeks Finished samples

More INHE 1005 papers and BS in Integrative Health samples

INHE 1005 Week 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free INHE 1005 Week 3 sample paper?

The full Week 3 term audit is above, ruling on eight usages of complementary and alternative.

What criterion does the audit use?

Whether the practice runs together with conventional care or replaces it.

Why is "complementary and alternative medicine" undecidable?

The bundled phrase joins both meanings and says nothing about how a practice is used.

Can someone call a practice alternative when it is really complementary?

Yes. One usage here does exactly that, and the audit overturns the label.

Why was one usage excluded?

It used "complementary" to mean free of charge, not a health practice.