HRMG 4202 Week 7 Training Delivery Plan Example

Human Resource Development and Change Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HRMG 4202 Week 7 delivery plan example settles four choices for training the front-of-house hosts of seven composite hotels: where, how spaced, who teaches and when. Walden HRMG 4202 asks that each choice be defended against a cheaper option, so the plan sets every decision beside what the finance manager would propose. Sessions run on each hotel's own kiosks because two kiosk models use different resets; four 45-minute sessions are spaced across three weeks, citing Cepeda and colleagues; two peer coaches who have handled stalled guests replace the free vendor trainer; and sessions use the 1:15 to 2 p.m. lull rather than overtime on days off. Where the cheaper option is good enough, a five-minute tablet refresher replaces a fifth session. A table totals about 102 coach and 102 host hours. Grossman and Salas on transfer complete a plan built for the BS in Business Administration.

CourseHRMG 4202 Human Resource Development and Change
WeekWeek 7
Paper typeDelivery plan
LengthAbout 920 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HRMG 4202 Week 7

1

Delivering the Host Training at Larkfield Hotels Decision by Decision: On Each Hotel's Own Kiosks, Four Spaced Sessions, Peer Coaches and the Afternoon Lull, Each Weighed Against the Cheaper Option

Student Name

Walden University

HRMG 4202: Human Resource Development and Change

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title lists the four delivery decisions and promises the comparison with a cheaper option that the prompt asks for.
2

Delivering the Host Training at Larkfield Hotels Decision by Decision: On Each Hotel's Own Kiosks, Four Spaced Sessions, Peer Coaches and the Afternoon Lull, Each Weighed Against the Cheaper Option

How the Plan Is Organized

The four-session design for Larkfield's 34 hosts, spread across seven composite hotels whose lobbies lost their counters in the spring, now needs a delivery plan. This plan takes four decisions in turn: where training happens, how sessions are spaced, who delivers them and when. Each decision is set against the cheaper option the group's finance manager would propose, with what that option would save and what it would give up. The plan accepts the cheaper option where it genuinely suffices.

What this page is doingOrganizing by decision rather than by session lets each choice be defended on its own terms.
3

Decision 1: On Each Hotel's Own Kiosks

Training will run at each hotel, using that hotel's kiosks, tablets and doors. The cheaper option is a single workshop for all 34 hosts at the group's office in Columbus, which would save coach travel of about 20 hours across the rollout. It would give up something essential. The seven hotels run two kiosk models, installed in different years, and the service screens differ: the reset for an encoding error takes three steps on the newer model and five on the older. A workshop on one model would teach some hosts the wrong reset. Training at each hotel also lets session 4 happen on the real lobby floor, which a central room cannot provide. Salas et al. (2012) note that transfer is strongest when the training setting resembles the work setting; here the resemblance is exact.

What this page is doingFormat comes first because it constrains every other choice.
4

Decision 2: Four Short Sessions, Spaced Over Three Weeks

Each session will last 45 minutes, spaced across three weeks: sessions 1 and 2 in the first week, session 3 in the second and session 4 in the third. The cheaper option is a single three-hour block, which would save coach travel between visits. A single block would give up retention. Cepeda et al. (2006) reviewed hundreds of experiments and found that practice spread across sessions is remembered better than the same practice massed into one, with longer gaps helping for longer retention. Hosts who learn the encoding reset once may meet the error only every few days; spaced practice makes it likelier they remember the steps when it happens. Short sessions also fit the lull described below, which a three-hour block would not.

Decision 3: Peer Coaches Who Have Handled Stalls

Two hosts from the three hotels that changed first in March will deliver every session, each paid a coaching rate for the hours involved. The cheaper option is a session delivered by the kiosk vendor's trainer, which is included in the contract at no extra cost. The vendor trainer knows the software well but has never worked a hotel lobby during an evening peak. The peer coaches have cleared these errors with real guests waiting and have approached stalled guests hundreds of times; they can answer the question every host asks, "What do I say when I walk up?" Their credibility also matters for the resistance the change has met: hosts are more likely to accept a method from a colleague who has used it than from an outsider. The plan does use the vendor trainer for one thing, a two-hour briefing for the coaches on the service screens of both kiosk models, where the vendor's knowledge is genuinely better.

What this page is doingThe plan values floor experience above polish, and says what that trade costs.
5

Decision 4: The Afternoon Lull

Sessions will run from 1:15 p.m. to 2 p.m., the quietest period in the lobby, after app checkouts finish and before arrivals begin. The cheaper option is running sessions on hosts' days off with overtime pay, which would avoid any floor coverage question but cost time and a half and ask hosts to come in on a rest day. In the lull, one host can cover the floor while the others train, so no hotel goes unstaffed and no one is paid overtime. Grossman and Salas (2011) identify an organization's visible support for training, including making time for it during work, as an influence on whether skills transfer.

Where the Cheaper Option Wins

After session 4, hosts will get a five-minute video refresher on their tablets in week five, showing the three fixes again. The more expensive option, a fifth in-person session, would add little: by then hosts will have practiced each fix several times and used them on the floor. The refresher costs nothing beyond the time to record it.

What this page is doingAccepting the cheaper option where it suffices shows the plan was judged rather than padded.
6

Cost in Staff Hours

In total, the plan uses about 102 coach hours and 102 host hours (34 hosts at three hours each), plus two hours of vendor time. That is more than the cheapest possible plan, but each added hour buys something the evidence suggests the training needs (Noe, 2020).

Table 1

Delivery Decisions Against the Cheaper Option

DecisionChosen optionCheaper optionHours saved by cheaper optionWhat the cheaper option gives up |
WhereEach hotel's own kiosksOne workshop in ColumbusAbout 20 coach travel hoursThe correct reset for each kiosk model; floor practice |
SpacingFour 45-minute sessions over three weeksOne three-hour blockAbout 14 coach travel hoursRetention through spaced practice |
WhoTwo peer coachesVendor trainer, included in contractAbout 100 paid coaching hoursFloor experience and credibility with hosts |
When1:15 to 2 p.m. lullDays off, at overtimeNone; overtime would cost moreRest days, and visible support from managers |
RefresherFive-minute tablet videoFifth live sessionCheaper option chosenLittle |

Composite organization; 34 hosts across seven hotels.

References

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354

Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x

Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661

HRMG 4202 Week 7 instructions, in plain terms

Week 7 turns a session design into a delivery plan. Organize it by decision, not by session: where training happens, how sessions are spaced, who delivers them and when they run. For every decision, name the cheaper option a finance office would actually propose, say what it would save and say what it would give up. Use evidence, such as research on spacing or transfer, to explain why the trade is worth it. Accept the cheaper option where it truly suffices, since that shows judgment. Give costs in staff hours as well as money, and total them at the end. A summary table that sets each chosen option beside the one you rejected lets a reader check your reasoning in a minute.

How this HRMG 4202 Week 7 example is built

An opening paragraph explains why the plan is organized by decision. The format section rejects a central workshop because the older kiosk model's reset differs, citing Salas and colleagues on matching training to work settings. The spacing section rejects a three-hour block, citing Cepeda and colleagues. The trainer section weighs peer coaches against the vendor's free trainer and keeps the vendor for a coach briefing only. The timing section prefers the afternoon lull to overtime, citing Grossman and Salas on visible support. A short section accepts a tablet video refresher over a fifth session. A table compares each decision with its rejected option, and a closing paragraph totals hours, citing Noe.

Reading the HRMG 4202 Week 7 rubric

Each delivery choice is scored against its cheaper rival. A plan that picks in-person training because it is more engaging, without saying what the cheaper option would lose, has stated a preference rather than made a case. The comparison table holds much of the credit, especially the column naming what the cheaper option gives up. Evidence from research on spacing, transfer or setting should support the choices. Costs in staff hours, not just dollars, show awareness of operational limits. Accepting a cheaper option where it suffices earns credit for honesty. A plan that ignores floor coverage or overtime misses the strongest operational objection. APA tables and citations should be accurate.

Common HRMG 4202 Week 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them

List the four or five decisions any delivery plan must make. For each, imagine the finance manager's question: why not the cheaper way? Write that cheaper way down and give it a fair hearing, including what it would save in hours. Then name the specific thing it would lose, using evidence where you can. If the loss is small, choose the cheaper option and say so. Convert everything into staff hours, because managers think in coverage as much as in dollars. A frequent shortfall is a plan that never mentions who covers the work while people train. If your training is for a hospital unit or a call center with round-the-clock coverage, we can help you work out the timing.

Get a HRMG 4202 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Tell us the sessions you have designed, or send the design itself, along with the prompt and rubric; the plan settles format, length, trainer and timing and defends each. First custom sample, no charge, in 24 to 48 hours. No finance office or peer coach in this plan exists outside it, and the eleven branches are fiction too.

More HRMG 4202 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

HRMG 4202 Week 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HRMG 4202 Week 7 sample paper?

The delivery plan, with every decision and its rejected cheaper option, is published here and costs nothing.

Why does the HRMG 4202 Week 7 plan train at each hotel?

The group runs two kiosk models with different reset steps, so a central workshop would teach some hosts the wrong reset.

Why four short sessions instead of one block?

Spaced practice is remembered better than massed practice, according to the review by Cepeda and colleagues.

Why peer coaches rather than the vendor trainer?

The coaches have cleared these errors with real guests waiting and can answer what to say when walking up.

Where does the cheaper option win?

A five-minute tablet video refresher replaces a fifth live session, which would add little.