| Course | HLTH 6207 Grant Writing |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 4 |
| Paper type | Objectives draft |
| Length | About 660 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Health Education and Promotion |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 6207 Week 4
One Goal and Four Objectives a Report Could Answer Yes or No: Who Changes, What Changes, by How Much and by When in the Aitkin County Carbon Monoxide Alarm Project
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 6207: Grant Writing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
One Goal and Four Objectives a Report Could Answer Yes or No: Who Changes, What Changes, by How Much and by When in the Aitkin County Carbon Monoxide Alarm Project
Goal
Fewer older Aitkin County residents are exposed to undetected carbon monoxide in their own homes.
Objectives
Objective 1: Alarms in Place
By the end of month 15, the project will install or replace carbon monoxide alarms so that 600 owner-occupied homes in Aitkin County with at least one resident aged 62 or older and a fuel-burning heat source have a working alarm, still inside its printed replacement date, no farther than ten feet from each bedroom, as verified by a home safety visitor at the visit.
Six hundred homes is about one in five of the county's 3,053 owner households headed by someone 65 or older (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025), a share two visitors working three-quarter time can reach in 15 months. The ten-foot distance is the placement Minnesota law already requires (Minn. Stat. § 299F.51), so the objective measures compliance with a standard residents are already bound by, not a new one.
Objective 2: Residents Can Test and Date Their Alarms
By the end of month 15, in at least 90% of the 600 visited homes, a household member will demonstrate pressing the alarm's test button and will read aloud the replacement date written on the alarm, as recorded on the visit checklist.
The objective has two observable parts because federal guidance separates them: the test button checks the circuitry, while the manufacturer's replacement age governs whether the sensor can still be trusted (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission [CPSC], n.d.). A resident who can do only the first may keep an expired alarm on the wall for years.
Objective 3: Alarms Still Working a Year Later
By the end of month 24, among a random sample of 300 homes rechecked 9 to 12 months after their first visit, at least 85% will have every alarm installed by the project still mounted in its original location and passing a test-button check.
This is the objective that separates installing alarms from protecting people. The target of 85% allows for alarms removed after nuisance chirps, moved during remodeling or taken down by residents who disliked them, which the rechecks will record by reason.
Objective 4: Community Reach Beyond the Visited Homes
By the end of month 12, the project will deliver 16 presentations of 30 minutes at senior centers, congregate meal sites, churches and fire department events in Aitkin County, reaching at least 400 adults aged 62 or older, as counted by sign-in sheets.
Presentations are where most homes would first hear of the visits, so this objective is both outreach and recruitment. It counts people reached rather than claiming changes in knowledge, because a 30-minute talk without a follow-up measure cannot support that claim.
What the Objectives Do Not Promise
None of the objectives promises a drop in poisonings or deaths. County poisoning counts are too small to show a change over two years, and a national analysis found no protective effect from state alarm laws on accidental deaths (Hampson, 2023), so the project measures what it can deliver: alarms in place, residents able to maintain them and alarms still working a year on. Each number is a target the project sets, not a claim about current conditions; the share of homes already compliant at the first visit is unknown and will be reported as a baseline.
The verbs are chosen to be observable: install, demonstrate, read, pass, deliver. A reviewer reading the final report two years from now can check each objective against the visit checklists and sign-in sheets and answer yes or no.
Fit With the Announcement
The objectives answer the FEMA program's emphasis on activities aimed at "high-risk target groups" (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2025) by naming the group in every line: residents aged 62 or older in homes that burn fuel for heat.
References
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2025). Fiscal year 2024 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant Program (Opportunity No. DHS-24-GPD-044-00-97) [Notice of funding opportunity]. Grants.gov. https://www.grants.gov/search-results-detail/359058
Hampson, N. B. (2023). Carbon monoxide poisoning mortality in the United States from 2015-2021. Clinical Toxicology, 61(7), 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2023.2237667
Requirements for carbon monoxide alarms, Minn. Stat. § 299F.51 (2025).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020-2024 [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. (n.d.). Carbon monoxide questions and answers. https://www.cpsc.gov/Safety-Education/Safety-Education-Centers/Carbon-Monoxide-Information-Center/Carbon-Monoxide-Questions-and-Answers
The Walden HLTH 6207 Week 4 instructions
The fourth week asks students to draft the goal and measurable objectives for their proposal. The goal is one general sentence. Three or four objectives follow, each containing the same four elements in the same order: the population, the change, the amount and the deadline. Numbers are targets the project sets, not claims about current conditions. Verbs should describe actions someone could observe, such as install, complete, enroll or demonstrate, rather than understand or improve. Many instructors want a short note under each objective explaining where its number came from and how it will be verified. Objectives should match the funder's stated priorities and be achievable with the staff and time the project proposes. Students should avoid promising changes in outcomes that cannot be measured within the project period. Sources support any figures used to set targets.
How the HLTH 6207 Week 4 example is put together
The sample states a one-sentence goal about undetected carbon monoxide in older residents' homes. Objective 1 counts 600 homes with alarms placed to Minnesota's ten-foot standard, and its note links 600 to about a fifth of older owner households and to the visitors' capacity. Objective 2 requires a resident to press the test button and read the printed date, with a note explaining why federal guidance makes both parts necessary. Objective 3 sets an 85% target for alarms still mounted and working at a 9 to 12 month recheck of 300 random homes, allowing for removals. Objective 4 counts presentation reach rather than knowledge change. A final section explains why no objective promises fewer poisonings, cites the national finding on alarm laws, and lists the observable verbs used. A last paragraph ties the objectives to FEMA's high-risk group emphasis.
HLTH 6207 Week 4 rubric: what earns full marks
Objectives are graded on whether a reviewer could check them. Each one should name a population, a change, an amount and a deadline, and missing any element costs marks. Observable verbs earn credit; vague verbs such as improve or increase awareness lose it. Faculty look for targets that are ambitious but achievable given the proposed staff and timeline, so a note explaining each number helps. Alignment with the funder's priorities is weighed, especially when the announcement names a target group. Restraint is rewarded: objectives that promise reductions in rare outcomes over a short period read as unrealistic. Consistent terms across objectives make later evaluation easier. Clear formatting, with one objective per entry, aids review. Citations for any data used to set targets complete the expectations.
HLTH 6207 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Objectives drafts are often returned because they describe activities rather than changes, such as "hold eight workshops" written as if it were an outcome. Another frequent problem is leaving out the deadline or the amount, which makes the objective impossible to score. Many students also promise to reduce deaths or hospitalizations in two years, which no evaluation could show. To write stronger objectives, list your population, change, amount and deadline for each before writing the sentence. Pick verbs you could watch someone do. Explain each target in a sentence. Check that your staffing could reach the numbers. Drop any outcome you cannot measure in the project period. If you would like objectives written for your own proposal and funder, our writers can draft a set that fits your logic model.
Get a HLTH 6207 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 4 instructions along with the rubric your classroom uses, and the first custom sample comes back free within 24-48h. Prompts that fix the number of objectives, or that require them tied to a specific announcement's headings, produce a sample built to that shape. Nothing here drafts objectives for a proposal an organization intends to submit.
More HLTH 6207 papers and MS in Health Education and Promotion samples
- HLTH 6207 Week 1: Federal Funding Opportunity Search
- HLTH 6207 Week 2: Funder Choice Discussion Post
- HLTH 6207 Week 3: Carbon Monoxide Need Statement
- HLTH 6207 Week 5: Grant Project Logic Model
- HLTH 6207 Week 6: Grant Method Narrative
- HLTH 6207 Week 7: Grant Budget Justification
- HLTH 6207 Week 8: Grant Evaluation Plan
- HLTH 6207 Week 9: Grant Draft Peer Review
- HLTH 6207 Week 10: Grant Sustainability Plan
- HLTH 6207 Week 11: Full Grant Proposal
- HLTH 6205 Week 4: County Binge Drinking Comparison
- HLTH 6112 Week 4: Two Jurisdiction Licensing Analysis
- HLTH 6110 Week 4: Artifact Narrative Paper
- HLTH 6051 Week 4: Rights Analysis Paper
HLTH 6207 Week 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 6207 Week 4 sample paper?
A full Week 4 objectives draft, one goal and four measurable objectives with explanatory notes and five references, sits on this page.
What are the four objectives in the HLTH 6207 Week 4 example?
Alarms in place in 600 homes by month 15, residents in 90% of homes able to test and date alarms, 85% of 300 rechecked homes still protected at a year, and 400 adults reached by 16 presentations.
Why does the sample avoid promising fewer poisonings?
County poisoning counts are too small to show change in two years, and a national analysis found no protective effect from state alarm laws on accidental deaths.
Where does the ten-foot placement standard come from?
State law already sets the rule, an approved, operating alarm no more than ten feet from any bedroom, so the objective measures compliance with an existing requirement.
Why does Objective 2 require reading the replacement date?
Federal guidance says the test button checks the circuitry, not the sensor, so residents also need to know when the alarm itself must be replaced.