| Course | HLTH 6207 Grant Writing |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 7 |
| Paper type | Budget justification |
| Length | About 670 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Health Education and Promotion |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 6207 Week 7
Budget Justification for a $390,864 Request: Every Cost Named, Its Basis Shown, the Arithmetic Written Out and the Activity That Requires It Identified, for an Older-Adult Alarm Project in Rural Minnesota
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 6207: Grant Writing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Budget Justification for a $390,864 Request: Every Cost Named, Its Basis Shown, the Arithmetic Written Out and the Activity That Requires It Identified, for an Older-Adult Alarm Project in Rural Minnesota
Basis of the Budget
The budget covers a 24-month project period. Salaries come from the Northwoods Home Safety Collaborative's current pay scale, a composite figure for this sample; unit prices for alarms and supplies come from written vendor quotes. Every line below ties to an activity in the method narrative.
Personnel: $194,000
Project coordinator, 0.5 FTE for 24 months at an annual salary of $62,000: $62,000 x 0.5 x 2 = $62,000. The coordinator recruits and trains visitors, schedules all visits, delivers the 16 community presentations, manages alarm inventory and prepares reports.
Home safety visitors, two positions at 0.75 FTE each for 24 months at an annual salary of $44,000: $44,000 x 0.75 x 2 positions x 2 years = $132,000. The visitors conduct 600 first visits and 300 rechecks, install alarms and complete teach-back at every visit.
Fringe Benefits: $54,320
Fringe is charged at 28% of salaries, the collaborative's rate covering payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement contributions: $194,000 x 0.28 = $54,320.
Travel: $19,572
Local mileage only; no out-of-area travel is requested. Visits are to rural addresses spread across the county, and visitors chain four visits a day, so the plan estimates 30 miles per visit including travel between homes: 900 visits x 30 miles = 27,000 miles. Presentations add 16 trips of about 60 miles each, or 960 miles. Total 27,960 miles reimbursed at the collaborative's policy rate of $0.70 per mile: 27,960 x $0.70 = $19,572.
Supplies: $53,040
Carbon monoxide alarms with sealed batteries rated for ten years: 600 homes x 2.5 alarms per home = 1,500 alarms x $32 = $48,000. The 2.5 average reflects the method narrative's projection for homes with two or three sleeping rooms, each needing an alarm within ten feet as state law requires (Minn. Stat. § 299F.51).
Replacement reserve for alarms found missing or failed at recheck: 75 alarms x $32 = $2,400, about a quarter of the 300 rechecked homes losing one alarm.
Printed one-page resident guides: 1,000 copies x $1.20 = $1,200, covering visited homes plus presentation handouts.
Tablets for the visit checklist: 2 x $450 = $900, budgeted as supplies because each unit falls below the federal equipment threshold.
Handheld carbon monoxide meters for visitor safety: 3 x $180 = $540, one per visitor and one spare.
Contractual: $18,000
Evaluation contractor, fixed fee: $18,000. The fee covers design of the recheck sample, data cleaning, and evaluation summaries at months 12 and 24, estimated at 150 hours at $120 an hour. The contractor is procured as a vendor providing a service, not as a subrecipient carrying out part of the program.
Other: $950
Presentation printing for slides and sign-in sheets: $800. Background checks for the two visitors and the coordinator, required before entering residents' homes: 3 x $50 = $150. Meeting space for presentations is donated by host sites and is not charged.
Indirect Costs: $50,982
The collaborative has no negotiated indirect cost rate and elects the federal de minimis rate, 15% applied to modified total direct costs, (2 C.F.R. § 200.414). Modified total direct costs equal all direct costs here, because the budget contains no equipment, rent, participant support or subaward: $339,882 x 0.15 = $50,982.
Summary
The request sits well under the $1.5 million award ceiling in the FEMA program's most recent announcement (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2025). Alarms account for about one dollar in eight; the largest share pays for the visits that make each alarm useful, consistent with evidence that owning an alarm and maintaining it are separate problems (Jarman et al., 2025).
Table 1
Budget Summary, 24 Months
| Category | Amount | |
|---|---|
| Personnel | $194,000 | |
| Fringe benefits | $54,320 | |
| Travel | $19,572 | |
| Supplies | $53,040 | |
| Contractual | $18,000 | |
| Other | $950 | |
| Total direct costs | $339,882 | |
| Indirect costs, 15% de minimis | $50,982 | |
| Total request | $390,864 | |
Figures are the sums of the lines justified above.
References
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2025). Fiscal year 2024 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant Program (Opportunity No. DHS-24-GPD-044-00-97) [Notice of funding opportunity]. Grants.gov. https://www.grants.gov/search-results-detail/359058
Indirect (F&A) costs, 2 C.F.R. § 200.414 (2025).
Jarman, H., Atkinson, R. W., & Machado, M. (2025). Carbon monoxide alarm ownership and maintenance in patients attending the emergency departments: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health, 47(4), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf091
Requirements for carbon monoxide alarms, Minn. Stat. § 299F.51 (2025).
The Walden HLTH 6207 Week 7 instructions
The seventh week asks students to justify each line of their proposed budget in prose organized by category. Personnel usually comes first, with each position named by role, its share of time, the basis for its salary and the tasks that time covers. Fringe follows with the rate source. Travel entries state purpose, distance or trips and who travels. Supplies and contractual entries say what is bought, for which activity, how many and at what unit price. Indirect costs cite a negotiated rate agreement or the rule that allows a default rate. Every figure should show its arithmetic, not just a total. A summary table usually closes the section. Instructors check that each cost connects to an activity in the method narrative and that totals add up. References cite any regulation or announcement limit used.
How this HLTH 6207 Week 7 example is built
The sample opens by stating that salaries come from a composite pay scale and prices from vendor quotes. Personnel shows the coordinator at half time and two visitors at three-quarter time, each multiplication written out and each role's tasks named. Fringe applies 28% to salaries. Travel builds 27,960 miles from 900 visits at 30 miles and 16 presentation trips, priced at a policy rate. Supplies list alarms at two and a half per home tied to the state's ten-foot rule, a replacement reserve, guides, tablets below the equipment threshold and safety meters. The evaluation contract is priced by hours and identified as a vendor. Indirect costs apply 15% to modified total direct costs and explain why the base equals all direct costs. The summary compares the total with FEMA's ceiling and notes the share spent on visits.
Where the marks sit in the HLTH 6207 Week 7 rubric
A budget justification is graded on arithmetic, connection and compliance. Every line should show how its figure was reached, and totals must match across the narrative and summary table; a single addition error damages a reviewer's trust. Each cost should tie to an activity in the method, and unexplained lines lose credit. Faculty check that rates have a stated source, whether a pay scale, a fringe policy or a federal rule. Compliance carries weight: indirect costs must follow a negotiated agreement or an allowed default, and items must be classified correctly as supplies or equipment. Reasonable quantities, such as alarms per home, show planning. A clear summary table aids review. References for regulations and announcement limits, in APA, complete the expectations for this assignment.
Common HLTH 6207 Week 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Budget sections are commonly returned for listing totals with no arithmetic, leaving reviewers unable to check them. Another frequent problem is a cost with no activity behind it, such as a laptop or conference trip the method never mentions. Students also misapply indirect rates, charging a percentage on the wrong base. To avoid these, write each line as quantity times unit price times time. Name the activity that requires every cost. Source your fringe and indirect rates. Check whether any item crosses the equipment threshold. Add up the categories twice and confirm the summary matches. Compare the total with the funder's floor and ceiling. If you need a budget justification for your own proposal, our team can prepare one that matches your method narrative.
Get a HLTH 6207 Week 7 example written to your instructions
What this needs is the Week 7 prompt plus the rubric your classroom posted; the first custom sample is free and lands inside 24-48h. An assignment supplying a budget form or fixing a ceiling gets an example built to that form and inside that ceiling. Actual costs from an organization's own application stay with the organization, unwritten here.
More HLTH 6207 papers and MS in Health Education and Promotion samples
- HLTH 6207 Week 1: Federal Funding Opportunity Search
- HLTH 6207 Week 2: Funder Choice Discussion Post
- HLTH 6207 Week 3: Carbon Monoxide Need Statement
- HLTH 6207 Week 4: Grant Goal and Objectives Draft
- HLTH 6207 Week 5: Grant Project Logic Model
- HLTH 6207 Week 6: Grant Method Narrative
- HLTH 6207 Week 8: Grant Evaluation Plan
- HLTH 6207 Week 9: Grant Draft Peer Review
- HLTH 6207 Week 10: Grant Sustainability Plan
- HLTH 6207 Week 11: Full Grant Proposal
- HLTH 6205 Week 7: Key Informant Interview Plan
- HLTH 6112 Week 7: Delegated Power Oversight Review
- HLTH 6110 Week 7: Recorded Session Critique
- HLTH 6051 Week 7: Language Access Policy Critique
HLTH 6207 Week 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 6207 Week 7 sample paper?
This page contains a complete Week 7 budget justification for a $390,864 carbon monoxide alarm project, with line-item arithmetic, a summary table and four references.
What is the total request in the HLTH 6207 Week 7 example?
$390,864 over 24 months: $339,882 in direct costs plus $50,982 in indirect costs at the 15% de minimis rate.
How is the alarm cost calculated?
600 homes times 2.5 alarms per home gives 1,500 alarms, priced at $32 each for $48,000, with a separate reserve of 75 alarms for rechecks.
Why is the evaluation contractor not treated as a subaward?
The contractor provides a service for a fixed fee rather than carrying out part of the program, so it is procured as a vendor and stays in the indirect cost base.
How does the request compare with the funder's limits?
It sits well under the $1.5 million ceiling in FEMA's most recent Fire Prevention and Safety announcement, which has no award floor.