| Course | HLTH 1000 Concepts of Health Promotion |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Program proposal |
| Length | About 1,040 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Public Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 1000 Week 8
Check Your Numbers at Home: A Six-Month Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring Program for Residents of One Senior Apartment Building in Pueblo, Colorado
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 1000: Concepts of Health Promotion
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Check Your Numbers at Home: A Six-Month Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring Program for Residents of One Senior Apartment Building in Pueblo, Colorado
Statement of Need
High blood pressure is common in Pueblo County, Colorado. In 2023, an estimated 32.2% of the county's adults reported a high blood pressure diagnosis, and 6.9% had coronary heart disease (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). Among adults with high blood pressure, 73.5% reported taking medicine for it, which means that roughly one in four was not. Blood pressure tends to rise with age, so the share is likely higher among older residents.
The program site is Riverside Terrace, a composite name for a Pueblo building of 96 apartments whose residents are 62 or older. The building has a community room, a part-time resident services coordinator and a bus stop at the door, but no on-site health services. Residents who want to check their blood pressure must travel to a clinic or pharmacy. Home blood pressure monitoring, especially when combined with support such as counseling or contact with a health professional, lowers blood pressure more than usual care (Uhlig et al., 2013). A program in the building can provide the monitors, the training and the support in one place.
Target Group
The target group is residents of Riverside Terrace who report a clinician's diagnosis of high blood pressure. Membership can be checked by a single question at enrollment. Residents without a high blood pressure diagnosis may attend education sessions but are not enrolled in the monitoring part of the program.
Objectives
Each objective names the group, a number and a date. The program runs from February 1 to July 31.
Objective 1. By March 31, at least 30 residents of Riverside Terrace with diagnosed high blood pressure will be enrolled and trained to use a home blood pressure monitor correctly, as shown by a technique checklist.
Objective 2. From April 1 to July 31, at least 70% of enrolled residents will record at least 12 home readings each month.
Objective 3. By May 31, at least 60% of enrolled residents will have shared a month of home readings with their own clinician, as reported by the resident.
Objective 4. By July 31, the average of enrolled residents' home systolic readings in July will be at least 5 mm Hg lower than their average in their first two weeks of monitoring.
Activities
Training follows the American Heart Association's guidance on home measurement (Muntner et al., 2019), covering cuff fit, rest before measuring, posture and taking paired readings. Readings above a set level, such as a top number at or above 180, prompt the CHW to advise the resident to contact their clinician that day.
Table 1
Activity Plan
| Weeks | Activity | Who | Objective served | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Posters, flyer under each door and a presentation at the monthly residents' meeting | Coordinator and volunteer | 1 | |
| 3-8 | Enrollment sessions in the community room, two afternoons a week; each resident receives a loaned monitor and is trained using a checklist | Community health worker (CHW) and volunteers | 1 | |
| 3-26 | Weekly drop-in hour: residents bring logs, CHW reviews technique and readings and helps prepare a one-page summary for the resident's clinician | CHW | 2, 3 | |
| 9-26 | Monthly group session on topics chosen by residents, such as reading food labels for sodium and preparing for a clinician visit | CHW and volunteer | 2 | |
| 9-26 | Phone check-in for any resident who misses two drop-ins in a row | Volunteer | 2 | |
| 26 | Final readings, monitor return or purchase option and closing session | CHW | 4 | |
Activities are numbered by the objectives they serve, so every activity can be traced to a purpose.
Staffing
A community health worker employed by a local health organization works 6 hours a week for 26 weeks, a total of 156 hours: 2 hours for the drop-in, 2 hours for enrollment or group sessions and 2 hours for records and follow-up. Two volunteers, recruited from residents and a local nursing program, each contribute about 2 hours a week. The resident services coordinator contributes publicity and room booking as part of existing duties.
Budget
The national mean hourly wage for community health workers was $27.01 in May 2025 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026). Employer costs above wages, such as payroll taxes, are not included and would be added if the employing organization charges them.
Table 2
Six-Month Budget
| Item | Quantity | Unit cost | Total | Source of cost figure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community health worker time | 156 hours | $27.01 per hour | $4,214 | BLS national mean hourly wage for community health workers, May 2025 | |
| Validated upper-arm home monitors with two cuff sizes | 35 | $50 | $1,750 | Estimate from current retail prices for devices on the US Blood Pressure Validated Device Listing; to be confirmed by quote | |
| Printed logs, flyers and clinician summary forms | 1 lot | $150 | $150 | Estimate from local copy shop price list for 2,000 pages | |
| Refreshments for monthly sessions | 6 | $40 | $240 | Estimate for coffee and low-sodium snacks for 30 people | |
| Community room | 26 weeks | $0 | $0 | Provided by building at no cost | |
| Total | n/a | n/a | $6,354 | n/a | |
The wage figure is the national mean; a local quote from the employing organization would replace it before submission.
Evaluation
The program will collect enrollment numbers and checklist results (Objective 1), monthly counts of recorded readings from logs (Objective 2), resident reports of sharing readings with a clinician (Objective 3) and average systolic readings from the first two weeks and from July (Objective 4). Because there is no comparison group, a drop in readings cannot be attributed to the program alone. A full evaluation plan will set out baselines, timing and what result would count as the program falling short.
Sustainability
At the end of six months, residents may keep their monitors at cost or return them for use by new enrollees. If the evaluation shows that objectives were met, the program will ask the building's management company and a local health system to share the CHW's time for a second round. Community settings have supported blood pressure programs before; a trial in Black-owned barbershops, for example, linked customers with pharmacists and achieved large reductions in blood pressure (Victor et al., 2018), which suggests that trusted places outside clinics can host this kind of work.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local data for better health, county data 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/resource/swc5-untb
Muntner, P., Shimbo, D., Carey, R. M., Charleston, J. B., Gaillard, T., Misra, S., Myers, M. G., Ogedegbe, G., Schwartz, J. E., Townsend, R. R., Urbina, E. M., Viera, A. J., White, W. B., & Wright, J. T. (2019). Measurement of blood pressure in humans: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension, 73(5), e35-e66. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087
Uhlig, K., Patel, K., Ip, S., Kitsios, G. D., & Balk, E. M. (2013). Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159(3), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00008
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Occupational employment and wage statistics, May 2025: Community health workers (21-1094) [Data set]. https://www.bls.gov/oes/
Victor, R. G., Lynch, K., Li, N., Blyler, C., Muhammad, E., Handler, J., Brettler, J., Rashid, M., Hsu, B., Foxx-Drew, D., Moy, N., Reid, A. E., & Elashoff, R. M. (2018). A cluster-randomized trial of blood-pressure reduction in Black barbershops. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(14), 1291-1301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1717250
HLTH 1000 Week 8 instructions, in plain terms
Program proposals ask you to design something small enough to run. Anchor the need to your site, using local data where it exists. Define the target group by something you could check. Write three or four objectives, each with a group, a number and a date. Build an activity plan that says who does what in which weeks, and link each activity to an objective. Count staff hours honestly. Prepare a budget table with a column for the origin of every cost, marking which figures are your own estimates. Describe what you would collect to evaluate the program, and explain how it could continue after the first round. Keep sections in the order a funder would expect.
How this HLTH 1000 Week 8 example is built
The proposal opens with county figures on high blood pressure from CDC PLACES and describes the building, its residents and the lack of on-site services, citing Uhlig and colleagues on home monitoring. The target group is defined by a single diagnosis question. Four dated objectives follow. Table 1 lays out activities by week, staff and objective, and the text describes training based on Muntner and colleagues. A staffing section counts 156 community health worker hours. Table 2 budgets wages, monitors, printing and refreshments, each with a source. Evaluation and sustainability sections close, citing Victor and colleagues on community settings. The proposal keeps every section short, so a reviewer can follow the link from need to objectives to activities to costs without losing the thread.
Where the marks sit in the HLTH 1000 Week 8 rubric
Faculty judge a program proposal on feasibility and internal consistency. A need statement grounded in local data earns credit, as does a target group that can be verified. Objectives are weighted heavily and should be measurable, with a population, a number and a date. Activities must connect to objectives, and faculty often trace them. Realistic staffing and a budget with sourced figures show the proposal could be carried out. Evaluation and sustainability sections should be specific, even if brief. Faculty also check that sections follow the expected order and that sources are cited correctly. Proposals with vague objectives or unexplained costs earn less.
HLTH 1000 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often propose programs that are too large to run or too vague to evaluate. Start small: one group, one place, one season. Write your objectives before your activities, then check that every activity serves one. Count hours as if you had to staff the program yourself. For costs, lean on published figures like Bureau of Labor Statistics wages, and mark anything you estimated. Think about what you would need to collect to know whether the program worked. We can help you design a proposal for a group and site you know. Have someone else read your objectives to see whether they could tell when each one was met.
Get a HLTH 1000 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Prompt, rubric, and whatever population and setting the section requires are the inputs. The proposal produced from them carries measurable objectives, a costed activity plan, and an evaluation paragraph. No invoice follows a first custom sample, which is 24 to 48 hours out. Every budget figure keeps its stated origin, and no cost is manufactured to round a total.
More HLTH 1000 papers and BS in Public Health samples
- HLTH 1000 Week 1: Discussion Post
- HLTH 1000 Week 2: Definition Paper
- HLTH 1000 Week 3: Determinants Analysis
- HLTH 1000 Week 4: Issue Brief
- HLTH 1000 Week 5: Campaign Critique
- HLTH 1000 Week 6: Midterm Discussion Post
- HLTH 1000 Week 7: Prevention Analysis
- HLTH 1000 Week 9: Peer Critique
- HLTH 1000 Week 10: Evaluation Plan
- HLTH 1000 Week 11: Course Reflection
HLTH 1000 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 1000 Week 8 sample paper?
The proposal for a blood pressure self-monitoring program in a senior apartment building, with activity and budget tables, is free to read here.
Who is the target group in the HLTH 1000 Week 8 example?
Residents of one senior apartment building who report a clinician's diagnosis of high blood pressure.
How are the objectives written?
Each names the group, a number and a date, such as at least 30 residents enrolled and trained by March 31.
Where do the budget figures come from?
The wage comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics national mean for community health workers, and other lines are labeled estimates with their basis.
How would the program continue?
Residents could keep monitors at cost, and the building's management and a local health system would be asked to share the worker's time.