| Course | DDBA 8561 Seminar in Managing Healthcare Delivery Systems |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 10 |
| Paper type | Change proposal |
| Length | About 770 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDBA 8561 Week 10
Smooth the Elective Schedule and Ask Who Absorbs It: A Change Proposal Capping Daily Elective Surgical Admissions at a Teaching Hospital, With Most of Its Analysis Spent on the Block Schedule That Must Change to Make the Cap Work
Student Name
Walden University
DDBA 8561: Seminar in Managing Healthcare Delivery Systems
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Smooth the Elective Schedule and Ask Who Absorbs It: A Change Proposal Capping Daily Elective Surgical Admissions at a Teaching Hospital, With Most of Its Analysis Spent on the Block Schedule That Must Change to Make the Cap Work
The Change
Cap daily elective admissions to the surgical inpatient units at 39, the weekly average, so that no weekday exceeds it. Redistribute operating room block time so that surgical services can meet the cap without reducing their weekly volume.
The Problem
Lakemont University Hospital, a composite 640-bed teaching hospital in Missouri, admits about 195 elective surgical inpatients a week. The distribution is uneven: 33 on Monday, 49 on Tuesday, 47 on Wednesday, 41 on Thursday and 25 on Friday. Midweek, surgical units run above 95 percent occupancy, emergency admissions board for hours, and cases are canceled for lack of an inpatient or intensive care bed. On Friday and Monday, beds sit empty.
McManus et al. (2003) studied a pediatric hospital and found that variation in the elective surgical caseload, rather than in emergency demand, was associated with periods when the intensive care unit could not accept patients. Litvak et al. (2005) distinguished natural variability, such as the random arrival of emergencies, which cannot be eliminated, from artificial variability, created by an organization's own scheduling practices, such as elective cases concentrated on certain days, and argued that hospitals should manage the second rather than build capacity for its peaks.
How Smoothing Works
Elective admissions are scheduled weeks in advance, so their timing is a choice. Emergency admissions, about 60 a day to surgical units, vary randomly. When elective peaks coincide with random emergency peaks, the units overflow; when elective admissions are spread evenly, the same random emergencies meet a lower and steadier elective load. Capping at 39 a day would remove 10 admissions from Tuesday, 8 from Wednesday and 2 from Thursday, about 20 cases a week or one elective case in ten, and add 6 to Monday and 14 to Friday. Ryckman et al. (2009) described a children's hospital that smoothed elective surgical admissions and reported reductions in intensive care diversions and cancellations, which suggests the mechanism works in practice.
The Function That Absorbs the Change
The benefit falls on the inpatient units and the emergency department. The cost falls on the operating rooms and the surgeons, through the block schedule.
[after]
Orthopedics bears the largest share because its joint replacement cases cluster on Tuesday and Wednesday, matching surgeons' clinic schedules. Moving two Tuesday blocks to Friday means two surgeons rearrange clinic days and that their patients, with typical three-day stays, are discharged on Monday rather than Friday. That shifts nursing workload and physical therapy into the weekend: surgical unit census on Saturday and Sunday would rise by about 14 patients, requiring additional weekend nursing and therapy staff, at an estimated $310,000 a year.
Anesthesia and operating room staff must also cover more Friday cases. Friday rooms are now often released early; under the proposal, they would run full.
Table 1
Weekly Elective Cases Moved by Service
| Service | Cases moved from midweek | Receiving days | Blocks affected | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthopedics | 9 | Friday 7, Monday 2 | Two Tuesday blocks become Friday blocks | |
| Cardiac surgery | 5 | Monday 3, Friday 2 | One Wednesday block shared with Monday | |
| General surgery | 4 | Friday 3, Monday 1 | Tuesday overflow block moves to Friday | |
| Urology and gynecology | 2 | Friday 2 | Wednesday afternoon session moves to Friday | |
| Total | 20 | Monday 6, Friday 14 | Six block changes | |
What the Hospital Gains
If midweek occupancy falls from above 95 percent to about 88 percent, the hospital's model estimates about 300 fewer elective cancellations and about 1,200 fewer emergency boarding hours a year, and the ability to admit more emergency patients midweek.
Reading the Evidence Critically
The published results come from hospitals that chose to report successes, and they were led by enthusiastic teams. Effects at Lakemont may be smaller. The cap should be piloted for one quarter with orthopedics and general surgery before extending it.
Engaging the Surgeons
The proposal will succeed only if surgeons accept new block days. The chief of surgery should present the midweek cancellation data to each service, and services that move blocks should receive priority for any new operating room time.
Measuring the Pilot
The pilot should report midweek occupancy, elective cancellations, emergency boarding hours and weekend nursing hours each week, compared with the same quarter a year earlier, so that both the benefit and the absorbed cost are visible.
Limits
Surgeon cooperation is the main risk; block time is valued, and Friday blocks are less popular. Weekend staffing costs are estimates.
References
Litvak, E., Buerhaus, P. I., Davidoff, F., Long, M. C., McManus, M. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005). Managing unnecessary variability in patient demand to reduce nursing stress and improve patient safety. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 31(6), 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31044-0
McManus, M. L., Long, M. C., Cooper, A., Mandell, J., Berwick, D. M., Pagano, M., & Litvak, E. (2003). Variability in surgical caseload and access to intensive care services. Anesthesiology, 98(6), 1491-1496. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200306000-00029
Ryckman, F. C., Yelton, P. A., Anneken, A. M., Kiessling, P. E., Schoettker, P. J., & Kotagal, U. R. (2009). Redesigning intensive care unit flow using variability management to improve access and safety. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 35(11), 535-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35073-4
The Walden DDBA 8561 Week 10 instructions
Week 10 asks for a proposal to change one part of a delivery system. State the change in two sentences on the first page. Present the problem with the organization's own figures and the evidence linking it to outcomes. Explain the mechanism by which the change would help. Then give most of your length to the function that absorbs the change, quantifying its effects in cases, hours or dollars. Read published results critically, including who reported them and why effects may be smaller elsewhere. Propose a pilot with measures, describe how affected professionals will be engaged and state the main risks. Eight to ten pages is typical, with the change stated on page one and most of the length on the absorbing function.
How this DDBA 8561 Week 10 example is built
The sample's problem section reports units above 95 percent occupancy midweek with boarding and cancellations, and cites evidence that elective caseload variation drove intensive care diversions. The mechanism section explains that scheduled peaks compound random emergency arrivals. The absorbing-function table lists cases moved by service, receiving days and six block changes. The text explains why orthopedics carries the largest share and how Friday joint replacements push discharges into Monday, raising weekend nursing and therapy needs. A section estimates about 300 fewer cancellations and 1,200 fewer boarding hours a year, and the pilot covers orthopedics and general surgery for one quarter. A short engagement section proposes that the chief of surgery share cancellation data and give services that move blocks priority for new time.
DDBA 8561 Week 10 rubric: what earns full marks
Change proposals are graded as much on what follows the recommendation as on the recommendation itself. A proposal describing the benefit to inpatient units and stopping there has made a pitch without analysis and rarely rises above the middle of the scale. The absorbing-function section carries the weight the week is designed around, and it earns credit when effects are quantified rather than acknowledged in a sentence. Evidence is marked on critical reading of published successes. Pilot design with measures for both benefit and cost shows readiness to test. Attention to surgeon engagement shows awareness of where the change could fail.
DDBA 8561 Week 10 help: mistakes that cost marks
Start with a week-by-week table of the demand you want to smooth and calculate what a cap would move. Then ask who schedules that demand and what they would have to change. Count the cases, blocks and staff hours affected, and estimate costs, including weekends. Read one or two published accounts of similar changes and note their limits. Design a pilot small enough to reverse. Think about incentives for the people whose schedules change, such as priority for new time. Keep the benefit section shorter than the cost section. Quantify the cost to the absorbing function with the same care as the benefit; a sentence acknowledging it is not enough.
Get a DDBA 8561 Week 10 example written to your instructions
Attach Week 10's prompt and the rubric, together with the flow problem your earlier papers identified, and a change proposal that quantifies the absorbing function arrives inside 24 to 48 hours, free on a first request. A section that prescribes a different change still gets the same structure built around its own choice.
More DDBA 8561 papers and DBA samples
- DDBA 8561 Week 1: System Boundary Discussion
- DDBA 8561 Week 2: Cross-Organization Process Map
- DDBA 8561 Week 3: Surgery Capacity Analysis
- DDBA 8561 Week 4: Emergency Flow Paper
- DDBA 8561 Week 5: Care Transition Handoff Study
- DDBA 8561 Week 6: Access Center Staffing Model
- DDBA 8561 Week 7: Bed Placement Information Brief
- DDBA 8561 Week 8: Length of Stay Cost Trace
- DDBA 8561 Week 9: Paired Measurement Note
- DDBA 8561 Week 11: Delivery System Paper
- DDBA 8560 Week 10: Decision Monitoring Plan
- DDBA 8541 Week 10: Exit Waterfall Analysis
- DDBA 8531 Week 10: Stage-by-Stage Account Plan
- DDBA 8524 Week 10: Herzberg Evidence Critique
DDBA 8561 Week 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDBA 8561 Week 10 sample paper?
The elective smoothing proposal and its block schedule table appear here in full, at no charge.
What change does the DDBA 8561 Week 10 proposal recommend?
Capping daily elective surgical admissions at 39 and redistributing block time to meet the cap.
How many cases move?
About 20 a week, roughly one elective case in ten, mostly from Tuesday and Wednesday to Friday.
Which service absorbs the most?
Orthopedics, which moves nine cases and two Tuesday blocks to Friday.
What does the change cost?
About 14 more weekend inpatients, needing an estimated $310,000 a year in weekend staff.