Drawn in swimlanes, the Week 2 process map for DDBA 8561 follows one referral route across three organizations, marks each handoff as a lane crossing and defends that notation from the literature. Searches like "ddba 8561 week 2 assignment example", "ddba8561 week 2 sample" and "ddba 8561 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished DDBA 8561 Week 2 process map looks like
Two pages of diagram and three of argument. The diagram runs left to right in five horizontal lanes: the patient, the primary care office, the imaging center, the orthopedic group's scheduling desk and its clinicians. Fourteen steps sit in their lanes, and each of the nine lane crossings carries a numbered marker, since those are the handoffs the course is about. Beneath the lanes runs a timeline strip in the style Rother and Shook introduced, separating time spent being served from time spent waiting between lanes. The written part explains the notation choice, walks the route once in prose, and closes with a short section identifying which crossings carry the longest waits and which lack any named owner on either side.
How a DDBA 8561 Week 2 example is structured
The diagram comes first because the reader should form a view of the route before being told what to see in it. The notation section follows and is the seminar's contribution: Rummler and Brache's swimlanes make handoffs visible as crossings between functions, which suits an argument about handoffs, while Rother and Shook's value stream map tracks a single product's flow and information, which suits a manufacturing line better than a referral that branches. The map borrows only the timeline strip from the second tradition and explains why. The prose walk-through is deliberately plain, one sentence per step, so diagram and text can be checked against each other. The final section ranks crossings by waiting time and flags those with no owner, handing both lists to the capacity and handoff weeks ahead.
Five lanes, fourteen steps
Each organization and role holds a lane, and each step sits in the lane that performs it. The patient's own lane carries the steps nobody in the three organizations performs, such as carrying an image disc between offices.
Crossings numbered
Every movement of work from one lane to another is marked and numbered. Nine crossings appear, and the numbering is reused in later weeks so a single handoff can be followed through the term.
The notation, argued
Swimlanes are chosen over a value stream map, citing Rummler and Brache on the white space between functions and Rother and Shook on single-flow mapping. The section concedes that swimlanes hide volume, which the timeline strip partly restores.
Waiting shown beneath
A strip under the lanes marks service time and waiting time for each step, drawn from published referral interval studies and stated assumptions. The longest waits sit between lanes rather than inside them, and the strip shows it without comment.
Crossings nobody owns
Three handoffs have no role on either side responsible for confirming the work arrived. The map lists them by number, which is where the handoff study later in the term picks up.
Where marks go in DDBA 8561 Week 2
Grading on a process map turns on whether the drawing can support an argument, and most rubrics here weigh the diagram and the written analysis separately. A tidy flowchart that stays inside one organization satisfies the drawing criterion and misses what this course is built to test. Numbered handoffs are rewarded because they make the map usable later; unnumbered arrows force a reader to describe each crossing in words every time it comes up. The notation section carries the scholarly credit; the strongest versions show awareness of more than one mapping tradition and choose between them for a reason. The ownerless-crossing list is where analysis begins, and maps ending without it read as description. Legibility at print size is also checked.
Get a DDBA 8561 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Share the prompt for Week 2 and its rubric along with the route your section asks you to map, whether referral, admission or discharge, and a swimlane map with a written defense comes back within 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. Lanes are labeled by role, so renaming them for your setting takes minutes.
DDBA 8561 Week 2 questions, answered
Does the map need to follow a real patient route?
It needs to follow a realistic one. The example uses a composite referral assembled from published descriptions of orthopedic access, with stated assumptions where the literature is silent. Mapping a route you know from work is fine if organizations stay unnamed and no patient information enters the document, which also keeps the map shareable in a seminar.
Which software should draw the swimlanes?
Any tool that exports a clean image will do, and many sections accept a table-based layout in a word processor. The rubric rarely scores the software. It scores whether lanes, steps and crossings are legible and consistent with the written walk-through, and the example's diagram was built so that each numbered crossing matches a sentence in the prose.
Why not use a value stream map instead?
A value stream map is a defensible choice, especially where volume and inventory between steps matter to the argument. The example argues that a branching referral route fits the swimlane format better because the claim concerns handoffs between organizations. A paper choosing value stream mapping can meet the same standard by arguing its fit with equal care.