DDBA 8303 Week 10 Case Findings Passage Example

Qualitative and Case Study Methodology for Business Analysis Research Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This DDBA 8303 Week 10 case findings passage example opens with an interpretive claim, gives a reader who never visited the setting enough context to follow and traces the claim back to its codes. Walden DDBA 8303 asks findings to go beyond reporting what people said, and the passage comes from a case of a composite family winery on Michigan's Leelanau Peninsula producing about 9,000 cases a year that moved toward direct sales between 2022 and 2025. The claim is that the tasting room changed from a place to pour into the place the winery sells, with seated tastings, year-round staff on commission and no tour buses. Three codes, sales records showing direct sales rising from 31 to 64 percent and dissenting staff voices support it, guided by Geertz, Braun and Clarke and Tracy.

CourseDDBA 8303 Qualitative and Case Study Methodology for Business Analysis Research
WeekWeek 10
Paper typeFindings passage
LengthAbout 770 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramDoctor of Business Administration (DBA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DDBA 8303 Week 10

1

The Tasting Room Became the Sales Floor: A Findings Passage From a Case Study of a Family Winery's Move Toward Direct Sales, Opening With an Interpretive Claim, Giving the Setting a Reader Needs and Tracing the Claim to Its Codes

Student Name

Walden University

DDBA 8303: Qualitative and Case Study Methodology for Business Analysis Research

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the passage's claim and the three things it does, which separate a finding from a summary of what people said.
2

The Tasting Room Became the Sales Floor: A Findings Passage From a Case Study of a Family Winery's Move Toward Direct Sales, Opening With an Interpretive Claim, Giving the Setting a Reader Needs and Tracing the Claim to Its Codes

Finding 3: The Tasting Room Stopped Being a Place to Pour and Became the Place Where the Winery Sells

Between 2022 and 2025, the owners of Larkspur Ridge Vineyards, a composite family winery producing about 9,000 cases a year in Michigan's Leelanau Peninsula, moved from selling most of their wine through distributors to selling most of it directly, through the tasting room, a wine club and online orders. The interviews and records point to one change at the center of that move: the tasting room stopped being treated as a place to pour samples for visitors and became the place where the winery made its sales. Staff, layout, scheduling and pay were all rebuilt around that purpose.

What this page is doingThe passage opens with an interpretive claim rather than a quotation, so the reader knows what the evidence that follows is meant to show.
3

The Setting a Reader Needs

A reader who has never stood in the tasting room needs to know what it was like before. Until 2022, the room was a converted barn with a long wooden bar and room for about 30 visitors. Two or three seasonal staff, mostly college students, poured five tastes for a fee, answered questions and rang up the occasional bottle. The owners' attention was elsewhere: on the cellar, on the vineyard and on two distributors who placed Larkspur's wines in restaurants and shops across the state. Weekend afternoons in summer were crowded, often with tour buses; weekdays and winter were quiet.

By 2025, the bar had been shortened and replaced in part by four seated tables where staff guide groups through a tasting. Staff are year-round employees who complete a training program the owners designed. Tour bus visits are no longer accepted. Each staff member is paid a base wage plus a commission on wine club memberships, and the room keeps a reservations calendar so that staff know who is coming. Geertz (1973) called for thick description, accounts that give enough context for a reader to understand what actions mean to those who take them; the details above are what make the change in the room's purpose visible.

The Evidence

The claim rests on three codes that appeared across interviews with both owners, the tasting room manager and five tasting room staff, and on the winery's sales records.

The code "room as sales channel" appeared in all eight interviews. One owner described the shift this way: "We used to think of the room as hospitality. Now it is where we sell." The tasting room manager described the decision to stop accepting tour buses as "the moment we chose fewer visitors who buy over more visitors who don't."

The code "staff as sellers" appeared in seven interviews. Staff described training in how to recommend a wine club membership without pressure, and the manager described changing hiring from students to adults seeking year-round work.

The code "seated tasting" appeared in six interviews and in the floor plans the owners shared. Staff described seated tastings as slower and more personal, and as where most club sign-ups happen.

The sales records support the claim. Direct sales rose from 31 percent of revenue in 2021 to 64 percent in 2025, and wine club membership grew from about 400 to about 1,900 households, with about 80 percent of new members joining in the tasting room.

What this page is doingThe evidence is traced to codes and sources, so a reader can follow the path from data to claim.
4

Where the Evidence Is Thinner

Two staff members described the change less favorably. One said that weekday shifts with no reservations "feel like waiting for a sale." Another said that the commission made some colleagues compete for groups. The finding does not depend on these accounts, but they show that the room's new purpose created tensions the owners did not describe.

Why the Claim Is Interpretive

A descriptive version of this finding would say that the winery added seated tastings, hired year-round staff and stopped accepting tour buses. The interpretive version says those changes share one purpose, turning the room into the winery's sales channel. The difference matters because the interpretation explains why the owners made changes that cost them visitors, which a list of changes cannot.

How the Claim Was Built

Braun and Clarke (2006) describe themes as patterns of meaning that capture something important about the data in relation to the research question, built by reviewing codes against the full data set. This theme was built from the three codes above, then checked against every interview and the sales records. Tracy (2010) lists rich description and multiple sources among the markers of credibility; this passage aims to provide both.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

The Walden DDBA 8303 Week 10 instructions

Week 10 asks you to write one findings passage from your case. Open with an interpretive claim that says what changed or what something means, not with a quotation. Give the reader enough of the setting, before and after if relevant, to understand the claim without having been there. Then present the evidence, tracing the claim to specific codes, with short quotations and the number of interviews in which each code appeared, and to other sources such as records. Report evidence that complicates the claim. Explain briefly how the theme was built from codes. Cite sources on description and thematic analysis. A passage of three to four pages is typical.

How this DDBA 8303 Week 10 example is built

The passage opens with Finding 3's claim in its heading and first paragraph. A setting section describes the converted barn before 2022, its long bar, seasonal college staff and summer tour buses, and the room in 2025, with seated tables, trained year-round staff, commissions on club sign-ups and a reservations calendar, citing Geertz on thick description. The evidence section traces the claim to three codes, room as sales channel in all eight interviews, staff as sellers in seven and seated tasting in six, with short quotations and floor plans, then to sales records and club growth from about 400 to 1,900 households. Two staff tensions are reported. Braun and Clarke and Tracy explain how the theme was built and judged.

Reading the DDBA 8303 Week 10 rubric

The passage is graded on whether it interprets. A findings passage that strings quotations together without a claim earns little; one that leads with a claim and organizes evidence to support it shows analysis. Context earns credit when it is concrete enough for a reader to picture the change. Tracing the claim to named codes, with counts of how many interviews each appeared in, makes the analysis transparent. Records that corroborate the claim add strength. Instructors value reporting evidence that complicates the finding, since it shows the theme was not built by selecting only agreeable data. A brief account of how the theme was built from codes, supported by a source, closes the passage well.

Common DDBA 8303 Week 10 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The usual weakness in a findings passage is a series of quotations with a summary sentence. Write the claim first, as a statement about what changed or what it means. Describe the setting so a reader can see it. Then line up evidence code by code, saying how many participants spoke to each, and add records where you can. Keep quotations short and let your prose carry the argument. Include voices that disagree. Say how the theme came from the codes. If you are unsure how to state an interpretive claim, a tutor can help you draft one from your coded data. Explain why your claim is interpretive and not just a list of changes.

Get a DDBA 8303 Week 10 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 10 prompt and rubric and describe the theme you are working with, along with the kinds of sources behind it. A findings passage with its data-structure figure returns in 24-48h, and the first one is free. Every quotation in it is made up for the purpose and labeled that way; real ones come from your transcripts when you build your own.

More DDBA 8303 papers and DBA samples

DDBA 8303 Week 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DDBA 8303 Week 10 sample paper?

Further down you can read the entire findings passage, setting and evidence included, free.

What claim does the DDBA 8303 Week 10 passage make?

That a family winery's tasting room changed from a place to pour samples into the place where the winery makes its sales.

Which codes support the claim?

Room as sales channel, staff as sellers and seated tasting, appearing in six to eight of eight interviews.

What do the sales records show?

Direct sales rose from 31 to 64 percent of revenue and wine club membership grew from about 400 to 1,900 households.

What evidence complicates the finding?

Two staff members described slow weekday shifts and competition for groups created by commissions.