| Course | DDBA 8151 Organizational Leadership |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 1 |
| Paper type | Presenting problem post |
| Length | About 590 words, 4 pages |
| Format | Discussion post, APA 7 citations |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDBA 8151 Week 1
Week 1 Discussion: The Presenting Problem
"They Have Stopped Acting Like Owners": Recording a Presenting Problem at a Twelve-Yard Building Supply Company Exactly as It Was Framed, Beside What I Have Seen, Before Naming Any Cause
How the Problem Was Put
I work as a regional sales coordinator at a family-owned company that runs twelve lumber and building-supply yards across Georgia and the Carolinas, about 340 employees in all. At the quarterly operations meeting in August, the vice president of operations described the problem this way: "Our yard managers have stopped acting like owners. They push every decision up to the region." Heads nodded around the table. The phrase has since appeared in two emails from the regional directors. It has become the name of the problem.
What I Have Observed Directly
I want to set down what I have actually seen, without interpretation.
Credit-limit exceptions for contractor accounts, which yard managers used to approve themselves for amounts up to $25,000, are now sent to the regional credit office. In my region, I counted 47 such requests forwarded in the last quarter; I do not remember more than a handful a year before.
Contractors are waiting longer. Two framing contractors told me last month that they had moved part of their orders to a competitor because a credit decision took most of a week.
Two outside sales representatives in my region resigned in the same quarter. Both mentioned lost contractor business in their exit conversations with me, though neither said that was the reason they left.
Yard managers still make other decisions on their own: staffing, delivery schedules and inventory orders look the same to me as before.
Where the Evidence Is
Several records inside the company could show what is happening: the credit exception log kept by the regional credit office, the delegated authority matrix that sets each role's approval limits, the company's restructuring announcement from eighteen months ago, the most recent external audit letter and the exit interview summaries held by human resources. The people closest to it are the yard managers themselves, the regional credit manager, the regional directors and the vice president who framed the problem. Yin (2018) recommends drawing on several kinds of evidence for any case, and these records together with interviews would give that range.
Why I Am Not Naming a Cause Yet
"Stopped acting like owners" is an explanation disguised as a description. It locates the problem in the managers' attitude. It might be right. But the pattern I have observed is narrow: one type of decision, credit exceptions, changed, while others did not. Schein (1999) warns that the problem a client brings is often not the problem that needs solving, and that a helper who accepts the first framing may end up solving the wrong one. Coghlan and Brannick (2014) note that insiders researching their own organization face a particular risk of adopting the organization's language as if it were a finding. I am an insider, so that risk is mine.
Question for Classmates
What is the exact phrase someone in your organization uses for your problem, and does what you have observed fit it everywhere or only in one place?
Reply to Noor
Noor, your hospital's director calls the scheduling problem "nurse burnout," but you list unfilled shifts concentrated on two units. Would burnout explain why the other units are fine?
Reply to Ben
Ben, you have already named transformational leadership as the fix for your team's turnover. What did you observe that a different cause, such as pay or schedules, would not also explain?
References
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
What the DDBA 8151 Week 1 instructions ask for
The opening week asks you to describe a leadership problem in an organization you know from inside, in two separate parts. First, quote how the problem was framed by the person who owns it, with their role, and note how widely that framing has spread. Second, list what you have observed directly, without interpretation, including anything that does not fit the framing. Third, name the records and people inside the organization that could show what is actually happening. Do not name a cause or a leadership theory yet; explain briefly why you are holding back. Cite sources on problem framing or insider research. End with a question for classmates, then respond to two classmates by testing whether their observations match the framing they quoted.
How the DDBA 8151 Week 1 example is put together
The post opens by placing the author as a regional sales coordinator and quoting the vice president's words from the August operations meeting, noting that regional directors have repeated them in emails. A section lists observations: credit exceptions up to $25,000, once decided at the yards, now routed to the regional credit office; contractors moving orders after week-long waits; two sales representatives resigning; and other decisions unchanged. A section names five records, from the credit exception log to exit interview summaries, and the people closest to the problem, with Yin on several kinds of evidence. A closing section explains why "stopped acting like owners" is an explanation posing as a description, citing Schein and Coghlan and Brannick on insiders adopting the organization's language.
Where the marks sit in the DDBA 8151 Week 1 rubric
The marks for this first post go to separation. A post that quotes the framing exactly and attributes it shows the author can treat the organization's language as data; one that paraphrases the framing into the author's own words has already adopted it. Observations earn credit when they are specific and uninterpreted, with counts where possible, and especially when one of them does not fit the framing. Naming records and people shows the inquiry has somewhere to go. Instructors look closely for a premature cause or theory; naming one in Week 1 loses ground even if it later proves right. A short explanation of why judgment is held back shows understanding of the method. Replies should test a classmate's framing against their own observations.
DDBA 8151 Week 1 help from the desk
The hardest part of this post is not explaining the problem. Write down the exact words someone senior used, in quotation marks, with the date and setting. Then list what you have seen yourself, as if you were a camera: counts, dates, events. Look for an observation that the framing does not explain, since it often points to the real cause later. List documents you could request and people you could interview. Leave theories out, even ones you suspect will fit. If the person who framed the problem is your manager, keep the quotation neutral and factual. If you are struggling to separate framing from observation, a tutor can read your draft and mark interpretations.
Get a DDBA 8151 Week 1 example written to your instructions
With the Week 1 thread instructions and the discussion rubric in hand, a finished post and a pair of replies come back within 24 to 48 hours, first one free. The organization in the sample is a composite built for illustration; the framing you quote and the observations you list have to come from the place you actually know.
More DDBA 8151 papers and DBA samples
- DDBA 8151 Week 2: Internal Records Review
- DDBA 8151 Week 3: Interview Synthesis
- DDBA 8151 Week 4: Cause Map
- DDBA 8151 Week 5: Diagnosis Defense Discussion
- DDBA 8151 Week 6: Theory Fit Memo
- DDBA 8151 Week 7: Pilot Intervention Plan
- DDBA 8151 Week 8: Leadership Consulting Report
- DDBA 8161 Week 1: Advantage Brief
- DDBA 8006 Week 1: Framework Choice Discussion
- DDBA 4990 Week 1: Firm Profile
- DBAX 9104C Week 1: Two-Audience Discussion
DDBA 8151 Week 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDBA 8151 Week 1 sample paper?
The whole presenting problem post, with its framing, observations, record list and two replies, is shown lower on this page free of charge.
What problem does the DDBA 8151 Week 1 post describe?
A vice president's claim that yard managers at a twelve-yard building supply company have stopped acting like owners.
What has the author actually observed?
Contractor credit exceptions sent to the region instead of decided at yards, slower decisions, two sales departures and no change in other decisions.
Why does the post not name a cause?
The framing already implies one, and the observed pattern is narrower than that framing predicts, so causes wait for evidence.
Which records could test the framing?
The credit exception log, the delegated authority matrix, the restructuring announcement, the audit letter and exit interview summaries.