BUSI 4004 · Business

BUSI 4004 Customer Relationship Management for Small Business sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Horace Blakeney, MBA Customer Relationship Management for Small Business Walden University Free custom samples in 24–48h

BUSI 4004 sample papers take the business after the sale as their subject: what a customer experiences next, what the business learns about them, and what it then does with that knowledge. Retention is argued, not assumed.

How this shelf works

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. BUSI 4004 is Walden’s Customer Relationship Management for Small Business course. It centers on what happens to a customer after the first purchase, and how a small business uses what it records about them. Searches like "busi 4004 week 4 assignment example", "BUSI4004 sample paper", and "BUSI 4004 week samples" land on this page.

What BUSI 4004 is really about

Most of a small business runs on customers it already has, and this is the course that takes that seriously. The first sale is expensive and the second one is not, which changes what the writing is about: not attracting attention but keeping a relationship that already exists. BUSI 4004 asks you to describe that relationship concretely. What happens after someone buys, who contacts them and when, what the business remembers about the last conversation, and how a complaint is handled by the person who happens to answer. Papers that treat these as soft topics score poorly. They are operational questions with observable answers, and the rubric reads them that way.

The second thread is what a business knows and how it behaves with that knowledge. A customer record is a small archive of someone's habits, complaints and payment history, and the course expects you to write about it with the discomfort that deserves. What the system stores and what a paper can defend using are not the same thing, and a plan that reaches for everything available because it is available will draw a hard question from any careful instructor. Strong papers say what is collected, why it is collected, who inside a small business sees it, and what the customer would think if they saw the same record. That last test is the one most writers skip.

What BUSI 4004’s assessments ask for

Written work in BUSI 4004 stays close to observable practice. Weeks usually ask you to map what happens to a customer after a purchase, to analyze why some customers stop buying, to write the reply a business would actually send to a complaint, and to argue for one retention measure worth the effort it costs. Discussion posts run throughout, and replies are scored on whether they press a classmate's assumption about why customers stay. Rubrics in current classrooms want specifics: named steps, named responsibilities, and a plan sized for a business with a handful of staff. They mark down enterprise language, since software features described at length are not an argument about a relationship. Length is rarely the problem here; vagueness is.

Where students lose points in BUSI 4004

The most common loss is a paper about loyalty that never says what the business does differently on Tuesday. Sentiment fills the page, no step changes, and the rubric has nothing to score. Second is the retention claim with no evidence behind it, an assertion that customers leave because of price when nobody asked them. Third is the plan built for a company with a department, proposing a system and a team that the business in the prompt does not have. Fourth is the complaint reply written to protect the business rather than to keep the customer, which reads badly to any instructor who has been on the receiving end. Fifth is customer data described as an asset and never as a responsibility.

BUSI 4004 grading scale at Walden: how the work is graded, from Walden Assignments
How Walden grades BUSI 4004, visualized by Walden Assignments.

The BUSI 4004 drawers

Week 1

BUSI 4004 Week 1 discussion post example

Week 1, by and large, opens with a post about a business you kept buying from. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 2

BUSI 4004 Week 2 touchpoint map example

Week 2 regularly charts every moment a customer hears from the business after paying. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 3

BUSI 4004 Week 3 retention analysis example

Week 3, more often than not, asks why a described customer stopped coming back. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 4

BUSI 4004 Week 4 complaint response example

Week 4 usually writes the reply a small business would send to one angry customer. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 5

BUSI 4004 Week 5 peer reply example

Week 5 replies normally ask a classmate what their customer would notice changing. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 6

BUSI 4004 Week 6 feedback read example

Week 6 in current classrooms turns survey answers or reviews into two things worth fixing. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 7

BUSI 4004 Week 7 CRM tool review example

Week 7 generally judges a system by what it lets a small staff remember. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 8

BUSI 4004 Week 8 data practice memo example

Week 8, in most sections, states what gets recorded and who inside the business sees it. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 9

BUSI 4004 Week 9 loyalty proposal example

Week 9 typically proposes one reason to return that the business could afford to keep offering. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 10

BUSI 4004 Week 10 service recovery plan example

Week 10 frequently sets out what happens the next time something goes wrong. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 11

BUSI 4004 Week 11 relationship plan example

Week 11, for the most part, ends with one plan for keeping the customers already won. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Walden University revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a BUSI 4004 sample the right way

Watch what the verbs in a finished example are actually doing. A strong customer relationship paper is full of things being done by named people at named moments, and a weak one is full of things being valued and prioritized. That contrast is the fastest lesson available here. Look also at how the sample handles what the business knows, because the paragraph that sets a limit on using customer information is usually the one that separates a good grade from an average one. Your prompt and your classroom's rubric govern the details. Send them for a sample written to your assignment, and write your own submission from it.

How these samples are written

The discipline behind every paper here: the rubric is the outline, each row gets its section, discussions get the thread treatment with substantive replies, and the format layer ships exact. Send your classroom's rubric with a request and the sample matches it, revisions included.

BUSI 4004 questions, answered

Can I write about the business I work for?

Most prompts encourage it, with one caution worth repeating: customer records, complaint logs and payment histories are your employer's and the customers' own, not yours to circulate. Describe practice rather than pasting data, and send the assignment prompt and rubric rather than any file. A sample can carry an equivalent business of the same size and show the same argument.

Do I need to know a particular CRM system?

Rarely. Undergraduate weeks are usually about the practice rather than the product, and a paper naming three platforms without arguing anything scores lower than one that describes what a small business records and why. Where a prompt does name a tool, write about what it changes in the relationship, not about its feature list. Rubrics reward the reasoning, not the vocabulary.

What counts as evidence that a retention idea works?

Something you can point at: repeat purchase patterns in the case data, published research on the sector, a documented practice from a comparable business, or your own observation clearly labeled as observation. What does not count is a general claim that customers appreciate attention. The rubric is looking for a stated basis, and an honest small sample described as small beats a confident assertion with nothing behind it.